The thing I noticed the most about the dress was in the videos as she walked. The hemline was spot on (this may or may not be because I've spent the weekend trying on floor length dresses).
Whoever tailored it, knows their craft!
The thing I noticed the most about the dress was in the videos as she walked. The hemline was spot on (this may or may not be because I've spent the weekend trying on floor length dresses).Also her waist in that dress - Smegs will be FUMING
If they'd stayed in the RF, it probably would have been her at the ceremony and not Kate.I imagine that the likes of the BAFTA appearances by the PPOW eat up H&M. Her, in particular.
It should have been MEEEEEEEE - falls to floor sobbing uncontrollably
Goes to show the lack of any aesthetic sense amongst the Sugars. Just like their Kween.The squaddies are FROTHING on le twit, all these hours later (still). Catherine COPIED 43 with her gloves! How dare she! She looks tacky (apparently) and not well put-together (apparently)! Did I mention HOW DARE SHE COPY?!?!?!?
And using all the hideous hashtags to do with W and pegging.
Not happy squaddies.
Guess that means 43 has had china shipped in from other states to throw?
View attachment 1974159 View attachment 1974161
Oh and it seems a blurry Lt Col was equerry-ing Charles in Wiltshire today (can't find a focussed picture. Chris Jackson obviously didn't read his brief properly!)
View attachment 1974168
Catherine wore elegant long evening gloves.The squaddies are FROTHING on le twit, all these hours later (still). Catherine COPIED 43 with her gloves! How dare she! She looks tacky (apparently) and not well put-together (apparently)! Did I mention HOW DARE SHE COPY?!?!?!?
And using all the hideous hashtags to do with W and pegging.
Not happy squaddies.
Guess that means 43 has had china shipped in from other states to throw?
View attachment 1974159 View attachment 1974161
Oh and it seems a blurry Lt Col was equerry-ing Charles in Wiltshire today (can't find a focussed picture. Chris Jackson obviously didn't read his brief properly!)
View attachment 1974168
Seeing this I wonder if The Gruesome's lease on Frogmore Cottage is longer than we originally thought. They had over £2 million pounds worth of renovations done on it before they moved in ..... not paid for by them I may add. However, when they decided to 'up sticks' and go and live abroad they were asked to pay back this money to the Crown (?) and some published accounts show that they did indeed pay this money back. At this point the lease may have been extended for a longer period of time as long as they paid the 'going rate' of rent for the place even when not living there.Could someone please kindly explain this whole Andrew might have to get out of the Royal Lodge thing for me?
He paid 1 Millon Pounds in 2003 for a 75 year lease, with him paying for the substiantial renovations the house needed at the time, which he did. So he has a valid lease. Wouldn't any further repairs have to be paid for by the Crown Estate or KCIII via his duchy money?
There is a whole passage about the terms and conditions of said lease and none of it says he has the renovate the house until the end of time as far as I understand it.
So what are all these stories in the papers about?
Running costs.Could someone please kindly explain this whole Andrew might have to get out of the Royal Lodge thing for me?
He paid 1 Millon Pounds in 2003 for a 75 year lease, with him paying for the substiantial renovations the house needed at the time, which he did. So he has a valid lease. Wouldn't any further repairs have to be paid for by the Crown Estate or KCIII via his duchy money?
There is a whole passage about the terms and conditions of said lease and none of it says he has the renovate the house until the end of time as far as I understand it.
So what are all these stories in the papers about?
Bring on the stupid wife’s political career , it will be the comedy gift that never stops giving. She’s super thin skinned , not that intelligent and cannot do without a script . The American journalists and fact checkers will eat her alive!
Well she better drop them titles if she wants to be in politicsBring on the stupid wife’s political career , it will be the comedy gift that never stops giving. She’s super thin skinned , not that intelligent and cannot do without a script . The American journalists and fact checkers will eat her alive!
Bring it on!
Feinstein will not run for reelection in 2024. She did not resign or retire. Her seat is not open for an appointment unless she retires from it mid-term, which she isn't doing (but should, since she's not all there mentally).
Bit it bold - fixed your lyrics for you and added some:Taking in to account the cost of very local accommodation & full board, the £22k salary amounts is not so shabby for a development opportunity.
This is as close to BP as I can find: https://www.onthemarket.com/details/12858688/.
At £3792 pcm/£45k p.a. for the flat alone - add in say £3k for bills - all from from taxed income takes the salary into a different league.
Plus free or modestly priced meals from the works canteen.
---
WaaaaghWaaaaghWaaaaaghWaaaaagh Precious Manbits
---
The woman wears white on the waistline…need there be more?
Dear god no, where's the fun in that?Well she better drop them titles if she wants to be in politics
They have to do something with the place. I understand it's listed so they are stuck with it, plus its on the Windsor estate which means they have to be very careful whom they pass the lease too (no russian oligarchs, no saudi princes, no dodgy businessmen, etc.).Running costs.
As he is not a working royal he is not on the civil list. No doubt his mother gave him money to pay for various costs of the house. Staffing, security, utility bills, general upkeep, groundsmen, gardeners.
Now that KC is in charge he may not see the point in paying towards a 30 bedroom that only one person lives in. Especially as that person had a multi million pound skiing chalet and a few brand new cars resprayed in his personal colours.
I saw a post from either Twitter or Reddit that showed (with photos) that Princess Diana was partial to wearing long gloves with evening dresses so who is really copying who?The squaddies are FROTHING on le twit, all these hours later (still). Catherine COPIED 43 with her gloves! How dare she! She looks tacky (apparently) and not well put-together (apparently)! Did I mention HOW DARE SHE COPY?!?!?!?
And using all the hideous hashtags to do with W and pegging.
Not happy squaddies.
Guess that means 43 has had china shipped in from other states to throw?
View attachment 1974159 View attachment 1974161
Oh and it seems a blurry Lt Col was equerry-ing Charles in Wiltshire today (can't find a focussed picture. Chris Jackson obviously didn't read his brief properly!)
View attachment 1974168
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?