My first thought was she’s looking over at H who is catching up with his family and she’s seething as he promised he wouldn’t leave her side !!! I don’t think she’s holding a baby , I think she’s in a strop !!!!! Run for your lives !!!!!!!!!I'm going to try the spoiler thing:
But what is she holding there?
It looks bald.
P.S
Sorry if spoiler fails, I also can't insert mushroom .
She must have forgotten to bring along the superglue that keeps their hands stuck together at all times!My first thought was she’s looking over at H who is catching up with his family and she’s seething as he promised he wouldn’t leave her side !!! I don’t think she’s holding a baby , I think she’s in a strop !!!!! Run for your lives !!!!!!!!!
It is covered by the Regency Act 1937. If George becomes King as a minor currently Harry would be regent. Provision was made for Prince Philip onlyRegency isn't automatic or set in stone.
An Act has to be drawn up and a Regent appointed.
Dont think so, Kate had a blue hat on with a white/cream rimIs that Kate in white on the right? The one Smeg appears to be staring at?
I think they will meet with the Queen, with the children, if they exist, and keep them hidden apart from that. They will then hope to generate a bidding war from the press, for photos of the children.If they have kids(they don't) Archificial would have been running up to the other kids at the window to play with them. They couldn't keep him with them at all times(the pic of them with the Duke of g) they weren't in sight then. He would have been spotted at the window.
I don’t think so as Kates hat was blue and white - might be the cook though with some pre ordered banana breadIs that Kate in white on the right? The one Smeg appears to be staring at?
Looks a different hat at the back to the saucer type style Kate was wearing so I’d say not!Is that Kate in white on the right? The one Smeg appears to be staring at?
Everyone one is dead was the speculation.I'm not sure the next in the line of succession automatically becomes the Regent, they have to be appointed so for all we know steps may have been made to ensure it's not harry
I wonder how much interest there is in the children though now…not in Uk anyway…would USA pay a lot ??.I think they will meet with the Queen, with the children, if they exist, and keep them hidden apart from that. They will then hope to generate a bidding war from the press, for photos of the children.
I hope so!! Not that I expect it to come to that
My point was, if everyone dies, George automatically becomes King, even before his coronation, he will be George VII. Whereas, a Regent even if there is an Act must be appointed by Parliament. It is not automatic that once everyone dies Harry immediately becomes the Regent, even if he is eligible acording to the Act.It is covered by the Regency Act 1937. If George becomes King as a minor currently Harry would be regent. Provision was made for Prince Philip only
Lollypops! she looks like the child catcher! chity chity bang bang! to me she looks like she is using the kids to glean info!
I think she really pissed off the few Americans left paying attention to them with her grotesque appearance at Uvalde. What she's never seemed to understand, despite being American herself, is that Americans are fascinated by the RF for much the same reason they're preoccupied with their Irish/Scottish/German/Swedish/whatever ancestry - it's a very young country with a relatively short and not entirely flattering history, so they tend to be very preoccupied with what they perceive as the ancient traditions and lineages of Europe. I think all humans like to consider our history and where we came from, and it's normal to want that sense of connection to the distant past. It's hard to generate that in an American context, because the oldest connection white people can establish there only really stretches back about 200-300 years, a very short time frame in the scheme of things.Just saw a British reporter/podcaster on GB News who lives in America saying people are getting less interested by the day in H & Rach. Good to hear…
WankerThe stand in weatherman didn't wear a tie!
Alex Beresford apologises to The Queen for not wearing a tie
The weathercaster was coerced into giving The Queen an apology by co-hosts Charlotte Hawkins and Adil Ray during his appearance on Good Morning Britain on Thursday morning.www.dailymail.co.uk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?