On the plus side the poster made no mention of Andrew. See? Glass half full Freda.That is pointless whataboutery, because William and Catherine simply wouldn't have used the name Lilibet, at all.
Exactly. Even if one parent gets some time off, most partners would only get a few days if lucky. But not this privileged pair of prats. 2 of them taking 20 weeks off...absolute joke. They are so far removed from the real world.It’s not leading by example to take 5 months paternity leave.
Its rubbing it in people’s faces that they are able to earn millions by doing the odd zoom call and a few interviews bashing your family.
Yeah, to be fair I can see her saying that because nothing's ever her fault it seems. If the children are born of a surrogate though, they should still be removed from the line of succession. I couldn't care less if she used one, I just hate the fact she could have lied about using one only to get the titles and to be in the line of succession.Poor thing was struggling with the "evil gray men, teh stuffy courtiers, teh institution, mental health, fear.. " that would deny her the joys of motherhood, she was afraid for Hawwy, afraid of the media....
The reality of this surrogacy thing is that the children are "commoners" so if they are born of a surrogate it doesn't matter, they have no titles. And the Harkles lies wouldn't matter.
Currently the parents however are inflicting a massive damage(yes, I know some don't see it that way) and are suffering absolutely zero consequences. The Church of England thing would only prompt the Harkles to claim that its irrelevant now, they have left.
The problem with this whole thing are the titles, the ones that the Harkles are having, even bigger is the fact that no one can take Harry's birthright away, unless he is Hewitts son.
Its enraging frankly.
Lidl & Aldiİ think it's major plastic surgery.İ have no doubt that Smeg and/or Hazzno have already filmed a Diana tribute for the unveiling, and that they will mention Lidl and Aldi. İ also think there will be major strategizing and scheming going on re. princesslilibetdiana.com. İ think TRF needs to employ psychology specialists to defeat and put these two in their place. TRF need to revisit protocols and the devious ways these two have tried to do their own thing at every twist and turn. Everyone is at the end of their tether with their tedious drama-making.
Link pls?!Ooh I'm going in!
Hmmm yeah but William and Catherine haven’t done a tell all interview and trashed the family to keep their income up have theyI am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
Lilly Windsor sounds cute as hell! Lilibet Diana is just hideous to me.As for Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor that just reeks of desperation to make her as Royal as possible. They could have just plumped for Lilly Windsor (like the Philipps children) but no .....
(I can't read all the pages so apologies if anything has been posted previously )
My favourite story similar to this is when she got escorted off site from Frogmore Cottage (or Nottingham Cottage, can’t remember which one it was) for taking photosLooks like meggy sue registered a domain for aldi as well as lidl, just after his birth too:
So, do we think this could be the start of things coming back into the public domain?
Half listening to the BBC 6 o'clock news whilst mashing my potatoes but I think it said that the gruesome twosome's solicitors were warning all newspapers as well not to print what had been issued by the "Royal Source". Lets see what's in tomorrow's papers then!I HATE THEM!!!!!
Issuing a legal warning to the BBC over them claiming they didn’t ask the Queen’s permission to use the name Lilibet - why is their only resolve to throw lawsuits at everyone who dare have a negative opinion of them? Absolutely pathetic
Whatever happened to press freedom? The newspapers can print whatever the hell they want and in this country there are actual rules and regulations so they can't get away with printing pure lies. Didn't one of the US tabloids basically say that HW was a psychopath (not like that's too far off though)?Half listening to the BBC 6 o'clock news whilst mashing my potatoes but I think it said that the gruesome twosome's solicitors were warning all newspapers as well not to print what had been issued by the "Royal Source". Lets see what's in tomorrow's papers then!
Thank you so much for finding this. It is a work of art. Beautifully written so that they are untouchable but very very damning, as they say “recollections may vary”.
should say 'lawyers' not 'solicitors' ...... wouldn't let me edit for some reasonHalf listening to the BBC 6 o'clock news whilst mashing my potatoes but I think it said that the gruesome twosome's solicitors were warning all newspapers as well not to print what had been issued by the "Royal Source". Lets see what's in tomorrow's papers then!
Well that is disgusting let's hope driabs and drabs are coming through, this is the walk of shame and hope it goes global where was Archie??? But she is still smirking!!Looks like meggy sue registered a domain for aldi as well as lidl, just after his birth too:
So, do we think this could be the start of things coming back into the public domain?
And we know that W and C would HAVE to have had agreement to name their children as they're in direct line of succession which needs Royal approval. Thats a big difference.Ah but William and Catherine would never show such little regard for a person as to use their private pet name. William and Catherine have earned their favourable view in the media and public opinion by virtue of their clean reputation. I understand what you are saying but it's no surprise to see everything H&M do now viewed through a negative lens because they themselves have lost all the love, empathy and support they would have had before they soiled their own reputation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?