Agree! I just posted exactly the same. HM was ambushed. It's like the Apple series, Noballs gets "permission" for one thing then comes up with something completely different. When there's a backlash he whines that he had permission.So this disparity between whether the Queen knew or not has an easy explanation. Both sides are right because the context of the conversation was not fully disclosed by Hazno.
I think he did say to the Queen that he was naming baby after her but what he didn’t say was that it would be Lilibet. The Queen presumed he meant Elizabeth as most people would of done.
He and Megsy then blindside the palace with the statement on Sunday which reveals the name in order for HMTQ to be put into a corner. It means that she then can’t tell him that she doesn’t wish it to be used as it’s already out there and would look bad if she said no.
The Montecito pair are deplorable if this is how it went down
ExactlyIt’s not leading by example to take 5 months paternity leave.
Its rubbing it in people’s faces that they are able to earn millions by doing the odd zoom call and a few interviews bashing your family.
And.... taking 5 months maternity leave when you don’t even have a jobIt’s not leading by example to take 5 months paternity leave.
Its rubbing it in people’s faces that they are able to earn millions by doing the odd zoom call and a few interviews bashing your family.
1,211 now!I see that the most critical review has 555 helpfuls. I wonder if that is normal
İ think it's major plastic surgery.Had a couple of days off from it all, feeling much better, with fighting spirit still ignited. Missed you all
Need to do a proper catch up but am thinking this:
The 20 week 'break' is code for rehab. For both of them.
The latest lawsuit threat = them trying to prise a reaction from HMTQ, after everything, they've still learned nothing
I can absolutely guarantee that Catherine and William would never ever dream of being so crass as to use that intensely personal form of Brenda's name. Never in a million years. Nor would they ever shit all over their families like the snarkles do, so the comparison is moot.I am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
GoDaddy? What the hell
William and Catherine would have never done it, simple. It's not cute, loving or sweet as you suggest. It was a cruel and shameless opportunistic raid on an elderly lady's private and special identity.I am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
I can only hope that Charles is too busy rewriting his Will and helping TQ rewrite hers before he sorts the Ginger one out.Then you have Harry who is one step away from wearing a straight jacket , His Wife who has him by the balls spreading her vile woke poison everywhere ,
I just want someone to shut them up Why is Charles not sorting the Ginger one out
Archive link for the poor:Just how many people do Archewell employ? If it's only them 2 it's a joke that Scooby Doo is saying they are leading by example and offers employees 20 weeks.
Palace frustration over Lilibet name choice is part of wider annoyance over Sussexes’ departure (telegraph.co.uk)
Behind a pay wall I'm afraid.
Ooh I'm going in!1,211 now!
Poor thing was struggling with the "evil gray men, teh stuffy courtiers, teh institution, mental health, fear.. " that would deny her the joys of motherhood, she was afraid for Hawwy, afraid of the media....But if the surrogacy rumours are true then she faked two pregnancies wearing moonbumps all the time. It makes her look more ridiculous with the stupid belly cupping if she wasn't carrying the baby and her ridiculous spending on maternity clothing. I do agree that you'll get some of the morons defending them with the "outdated rules" argument.
What's the Church of England's view on surrogacy? Maybe this could be the RF's argument?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?