Harry and Meghan #84 Haz should've listened to Auntie Anne, kept his balls to stay a man.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
A great post I saw today:


Harry and Meghan can’t stop lying because their whole premise for quitting as working royals was based upon a lie. They’ve lied since the beginning and every step of the way in order to sustain the false premise. The complicit media is helping them to avoid questions and obvious holes/ contradictions in their lies.

They were negotiating on monetizing royal titles into more fame and fortune. When advised against it they devised stories to garner public sympathy and as reasons for fleeing to quiet, publicity-shy LA. They remade themselves into victims to Harry’s family as bad guys because this sort of tabloid shit is guaranteed publicity.

Some examples of holes in their lies: wanting to be financially independent yet bemoaned about daddy cutting off financial support; Meghan unable to get mental health support when all evidence flies contrary to the vague reasons; not given royal advisers to help Meghan adjust to new role when in reality they didn’t want advisers to fuck with their side deals to enrich themselves; using supposed mental health struggles as reasons for being assholes to staff; casting family as racist by using vague innuendos and stretching lies with common tricks liars use including (paraphrasing) “if that’s what you want to believe, you wouldn’t be wrong to assume that”.

Face it, they’re shameless liars who tell lies that are obvious contradictions which the US media, as it did with Trump, don’t bother fact-checking. But because they’re so blatantly bad at it their lies are now being exposed drip drip style by tabloids, the one media they can’t control. Remember, it was the tabloids who exposed Michael Jackson’s weirdness and John Edwards’ love child before anyone had any inkling.

The Sussexes have made themselves into persona non grata within the A-list and super-rich which circles they wish to belong. People in those circles generally avoid gossiping famewhores who can’t help telling lies and who have no qualms about throwing family under the bus.
 
Reactions: 59
That article is a gold mine of info to nail them with.
Also, after I read it last night I picked up on the meeting with Quibi being directly after the Sandringham summit. Apparently hazza went straight from Sand' to the Quibi meeting. Well, that was the night he gave his Sentable farewell speech and I have said on here a few times that he looked really discombobulated at that event. Strange, as it was his "Fuck you all you cunts(us) I'm off, byeeee" chance to sneer at us. Then it emerged that prior to his speech he was heard backstage on the phone to cuntchops in Canada almost in tears and really really angry. He was shouting about how she had promised to be here with him today for Sandringham and more so for the Sentable dramatic farewell. He was really pissed off and it showed when he made his speech. He looked distracted and upset.
BUT, now we know he had that important sit down with Quibi in between the Sandringham meet and Sentable event. OK, let's get real here, does anyone truly think hazza is capable of handling a meeting with executives discussing finances and contract details and content and insurance and every facet of a huge money making deal on his own? Without mummy meggy holding his hand? No, me neither. He probably made a right cunt of himself and hadn't a clue WTF was going on. Then after that he had the long screaming phone call with smeggy ranting at her "You promised you'd be here! YOU PROMISED!". I suspect now that his anger was more about her leaving him to deal with the Quibi meeting rather than the megxit meeting. He likely knew he'd ballsed it up and was out of his depth.
Thing is, she promised him world domination and money schemes galore, all he had to do was marry her and her expertise in business would do the rest. He probably said "Great! But I want a crotch goblin guaranteed too. Wills has three and I want one as well !" And she explained she had that issue covered, don't worry.
And here we are, it's all a pile of shit. He must at some point wonder WTF went wrong, but is too thick to realise he's ever so slowly being markled. He just hasn't worked it out yet.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 77
Who or what was the source for Hazza shouting into a phone at Smegs backstage at Sentable? Great tea, if true!
 
Reactions: 30
It’s possible she had a variety to moon bumps to fill out each outfit.
Just like having the right bra for T shirts, gym, deep cleavage special frock & of course, boudoir.
As for the swing low when it should have been high, it’s all about the fit & hoiking up the straps.
Just sweating the assets !
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 15
She never had the right bra - ever at all!
 
Reactions: 33
Gavin doesn't look like the Duck Rabbit edition of Farchy. It says the child in the black and white beach video is Gavin Gringas and that it was his mother Brynn in the background and the father with the camera.
Whoever the child is, what sort of parents would allow their child to pretend to be another child in these sleazy circumstances, and allow a video of him to be shown to millions during the Porker interview?
H&M self-righteously bleat about privacy for their son but are shameless about flogging photos of other people's infants pretending to be Farky. FWIW I don't believe Farky exists, and that we've seen a succession of moonbumps, borrowed infants and dolls.
"Archie joins Meghan Markle and Prince Harry in Oprah interview". ... except he doesn't. None of it was real, and they play people non-stop.
This child's parents deserve to get into hot water for pimping out their son. If it's friend Brynn, she's been markled already.
 
Reactions: 21
Hmmm, could be knobbly knees.
Which reminds me to get chicken out of the freezer.
But that frock is cut in a very odd way.
 
Reactions: 14
saw this in another forum. all the horrible stories are all coming out now and linking up ever since her former staffs are talking and RF are investigating! GOOD! let this evil witch be called out for good.

'My WIFE WAS RACIALLY ATTACKED AND NOBODY FROM MY FAMILY SAID ANYTHING'-Umm, again, I am in India and we are not obsessed with your family but we do get important news from time to time. The 'attacks' on your wife were done by the vermin who work in tabloids and they did the same to Kate. I remember before the Kate-William wedding, even our newspapers were splashed with rumors, gossip, salacious details of Kate's life and words like 's**t , floozy, second hand, katy waity' were routinely used for her. We got to know about her dating past, there were discussions on chat boards around the world and comments in youtube videos if William is going to marry a 'used tissue paper', how 'flat chested' she was. All this and more. NOBODY spoke up or defended her then either and this was not racially motivated was it? Diana was hounded and that was not racial either was it? Hasn't Camilla been called a dog in the same tabloids? Hasn't Charles been called a loser, old twat and what not? What's wrong is wrong for everyone and not just for someone playing the race card, right?

I was a scholarship student and went to a college which I could not have otherwise afforded, and had some classmates coming from extremely rich families. One of them has a sister who works in an NGO that Meghan works with too. She was even invited to the royal wedding and has met and worked with Meghan quite a number of times over the past 5 years. After the Oprah airing, I was talking to my friend and he simply said, 'Do NOT believe a word of that. My sister told me this woman is a chameleon. One thing for the cameras and another behind. Not a thing in front of the cameras is true. Not a thing.'

This is an NGO that works for menstrual hygiene of women in India (and probably some other countries too I am not sure) and Meghan has been associated with it for some time.
One specific incident that my friend shared- his sister was in touch with Meghan's staff for some write-up about the NGO in some big publication. Meghan made one of her staff member's life hell and made her rewrite the piece at least a dozen times just to make her cry. In the end she used the 2nd draft but my friend's sister said that the staff girl was terrified of getting an email from Meghan. TERRIFIED. She was an intern, all of 18. Talk about empathy and compassion of a women rights activist. Reminded me of reports of Meghan's staff in the palace being reduced to tears.

and who does this??

 
Reactions: 54
Hazza is rude boy, & still wokeywhite.

Were I Anne I’d have Auntieclipped him about the ear.
 
Reactions: 15
This is what Meghan does. She is the perennial victim who tries too hard to come across as a 'good' person. Genuinely good people do not try to look good. They just are. Her act is what makes her one of the most hated people on the planet today.
 
Reactions: 46
Thank you that was most enlightening.
 
Reactions: 23
The moonbump thing is a bit silly.
Markle seems to wear something like a baby dol underneath.
Foundation garments are a foreign concept to her.
The original dress was alltered for modesty.
The bottom of the dress is altered in photoshop to cover the dress slit, because she has no class and walks like a hippo.
The filter used (basically a tool) is called liqify and the pucker tool can also be used, examples of usage:
The fallen bump picture shows no slit, and whoever distributed it with or without sinister motives has forgotten to photoshop the top bump away, which would be logical.
Unless one sees a camera RAW, one assumes that everything was altered.
The knee can be also a photoshop fail, namely a patch tool multiplication, which happens all the time, the getty image with the photographers name is imposed later devlin cant be found photographing that event.
Of course feel free to disregard, but I remember Catherine getting far worse photoshops, long before Markle, including dirty feet, cigarettes, and vaginal rash.
 
Reactions: 23
I was just having a nose at that account and it looks like Rosie Huntington-Whitely, Sophie Turner and Ava Philippe regularly like the ones that are negative towards Meghan too! Wonder what the tea is! Ava is Reese Witherspoon’s daughter, Reese laughed about being invited to M&Hs wedding as she had never met them, and declined to attend.
 
Reactions: 32
Why would you invite people you have never met to your bloody wedding? The desperation is just awful. For those who didn't know them but chose to attend anyway; I pity you. Haznoballs could have invited a load of his Invictus chums but Smegma wouldn't have liked that.
 
Reactions: 39
ET Canada had some sort of pimp-the-Harkles documentary on Friday night - also sponsored by Pantene. It's full on propaganda central from the bits I've seen, with odious toady Scobie in full dribble mode, but the comments under the YouTube clips from angry Canadians are gold.

'How much are Sunshine Sachs paying for this'

'Now that their lies are talked about in the US media, they have paid for advertising airing on ET Canada'.

“If you want to change the world go home and love your family.”- Mother Teresa.

'Welcome to the Woko Moano Charity Ball'

'Love starts AT HOME!!!!!!! With your family members.... Please...'

 
Reactions: 27
Is this a come-back because of the Commonwealth Trust drubbing of them? Canada owes them nothing - particularly her. She must think she has some lingering popularity or something up there. Foolish cow.
 
Reactions: 25
Hmm, maybe there is tea with Troian. I assumed she was just wisely staying out of it unlike her ranty, now unemployed husband but hmm....Work wife vs Real wife and Troian is a more successful actress and producer even though Meh is now more famous.
 
Reactions: 17
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.