Harry and Meghan #83 Harry's no wimp-o, nows he's Head Chimpo!

[MillicentMargaret]

Personally I don't think that Lady C should have outed Anne at all. In my view that was a big misjudgment.

I'm sure every single member of the family had reservations about Snarkle. Naming anyone will inevitably cause a backlash in the media.

Anne is a strong lady and would probably take one for the team to take the heat off Charles but it seems really unfair.

I'm not sure she should have said anything about it even if she does have a solid source - which I'm not 100% convinced she does. She has contacts but I doubt she's as best buds as she'd like everyone to think.

However Gayle King certainly also has an agenda to make everything seem as dramatic as possible and that this interview is single handedly going to topple the monarchy and the Commonwealth.

 

[AudreyAnn]

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Soho House is masquerading as a high class brothel!

The royals cant do right it seems:

Idris Elba defends Harry and Meghan's Oprah interview: 'You cannot take someone's voice away'

The actor attended Harry and Meghan's wedding, and even DJ'd at the reception.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Backstabbers :

Idris Elba Celebrates the Key Role Prince Charles Played in His Early Acting Career

Prince Charles played a surprising role in launching the careers of Idris Elba, David Oyelowo, Naughty Boy and more

people.com

I think this is what's called "riding two horses!" I hope he never gets to be James Bond now!

Did he have any comments on all the lies the voice tells?

Another of the wokerati I fear

 

[Baguette]

I'm not sure she should have said anything about it even if she does have a solid source - which I'm not 100% convinced she does. She has contacts but I doubt she's as best buds as she'd like everyone to think.

However Gayle King certainly also has an agenda to make everything seem as dramatic as possible and that this interview is single handedly going to topple the monarchy and the Commonwealth.

The Mail are running the story... ETA 'Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the claims made in a podcast '
(It's a straight account of Lady C's comments on her podcast - no additional reporting)

Lady Colin Campbell claims Princess Anne is royal accused of racism

Socialite Lady Colin Campbell has claimed the Queen's daughter Princess Anne is the royal Meghan and Harry accused of racism in their bombshell interview with Oprah

www.dailymail.co.uk

She added that Anne was concerned that Meghan may not 'actually have respect for the institution in to which she was marrying, and the family in which she was marrying'.

'Meghan and Harry have used that genuine concern of a loving aunt, knowing that because she is down to earth, experienced, modest, intelligent and sensible, and that you cannot make a sow's ear into a silk purse.

'Nobody is the guilty party in terms of racism. But Princess Anne was the champion in terms of 'don't marry that girl, she is unsuitable. She is wrong for the country, wrong for the job. Well, it's turned out to be true.

 

[JAdore]

Anne can take it. She’s not going to be Queen, her patrons love her, she’s the hardest working royal who isn’t the Queen and I think she’s bulletproof because she doesn’t care what people on Twitter think.

Agree. I also think she's pretty bulletproof amongst the public - no drama, Olympian, kids seem switched on decent sorts, kidnapped and told kidnapper off. Hard not to like her.

 

[Evangelina]

I think Campbell twigged it from the interview.
Markle uses the same words almost mockingly "reinvent the wheel..." as princess Anne in her interview about the younger royals. In the same spot Markle fails to grasp blood princess vs married in HRH, and comments on others working half in half out while omitting that these individuals are not 1.working royals or 2.not HRHs.
Still don't like what Lady C did.

 

[AudreyAnn]

Personally I don't think that Lady C should have outed Anne at all. In my view that was a big misjudgment.

I'm sure every single member of the family had reservations about Snarkle. Naming anyone will inevitably cause a backlash in the media.

Anne is a strong lady and would probably take one for the team to take the heat off Charles but it seems really unfair.

Maybe she was asked if she'd take the hit . Take the heat away from the other senior royals. She really has an outstanding track record of dedication, and frankly told H what he didn't want to hear. She's a tough cookie for sure, and I think she'll come off the better for it in the long run

Amal Clooney has been on the board of the Prince's Trust since 2019, which I was surprised to learn recently.

Who're you going to stand with when the chips are down Armegeddon Markle or the future King of the United Kingdom?

99.9 percent of Tattlers would trample over the woman to get to Charles. I've always liked the Monarchy and have enjoyed watching each generation grow up paralleling my life to theirs (they definitely had the best end of things) but it's surprised me recently just how much.

The alternatives are SO much worse, look around the world. RF is not perfect but the stability and consistency it offers us all in this MAD world is better than anything else in my view. There are checks and balances in place, but HMTQ hasn't put a foot wrong and people admire what she has done in her ceaseless years of service. Its extraordinary . I think William will be a chip of the old block and all this BS will make him and the inner circle stronger.

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

Erm. Welby has made it clear he didn't marry them earlier, I think, as those were 'private and pastoral meetings'. The big one is whether they had married elsewhere like Botswana. Yes I've got a 'Go on, I dare ya!' vibe about his comments about the legal wedding as well.

It's taken too long for this to be said, and it's being said too elaborately, when a two sentence factual comment from Lambeth Palace should have emerged within 24 hours if this was straightforward.

This is clear as mud to me. If they were already married in Botswana as rumoured where does that leave the 19th May wedding? Don't you have to declare before you get married that you are a spinster or divorcee or whatever? Nothing these two do is ever straightforward and above board, and they take an immature and puerile delight in trying to get one over on everyone with their games and lies. Even on serious issues such as getting married and giving birth. No wonder nobody believes a word they say.

 

[AudreyAnn]

I never post on Twitter, I'm like a silent assassin, pop in grab the tea and post it here for all to enjoy 🫖

It is all a bit worrying I have to concede, it sort of plays into the hand of an establishment behind the establishment.

I kind of said this the other day but the last few days I’ve gone down a bit of a rabbit hole looking into North Korea.

Not going to get all heavy about it but it gave me even more perspective than I already had on woke stuff and MM by extension. I’ve always thought the woke tit is just that, a load of tit. But the true hardships, oppression, lack of basic human rights and poverty these people face is unbelievable.

And yet you have Miss Arrogant Nobody Markle complaining that she wasn’t number 1, that someone made a comment about her baby (a lie anyway), that she was bullied by the press, that she wasn’t accepted into the family, or by the public. That she didn’t have a voice.

This woman is one of the most privileged, wealthy, fortunate people on the planet. Not only are her claims about the RF and press racism total bullshit, they’re also sickeningly trivial even if true. Oh so an older member of the RF was curious how a biracial baby might look. How evil of them. So a journalist complimented you on your ‘rich heritage and blood’ and good looks. How evil of her.

Meghan is a disgusting narcissist and these jumped up, pathetic, woke warriors siding with her need to get a bleeping grip.

You are spot on, look at all the dreadful human rights issues going on around the world, it's all so Medieval its tradgic

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

Well, for me it clears up Bugger all.

1) its 2 weeks too late
2) its clear as mud

I just posted on this and used the same phrase Clear as Mud. Great minds ..!!.

On a serious note, shes taken him away from many British and Commonwealth Charities. People dont seem to be mentioning this , in the media?

Probably he's now seen as such a pain in the a..se that he's not a great loss. Who wants an apologist like him droning on about our racist past when he can't seem to tell the difference between Clive of India and the Commonwealth countries? A woke joke, drug addict and married to a lunatic? Fantastic role model, not.

 

[SnowyCal]

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Soho House is masquerading as a high class brothel!

It's members, such as the gruesome twosome who met there on their dates, are "associating" in rooms which are decorated in wallpaper which have genatalia and pornographic images woven into the leaves of the pattern - no doubt considered "art" or artistic" by the members.

This Markus Anderson chap who appears to be very influential both in Soho House and their relationship, to my mind, seems no better than a pimp! The basis of the gruesome twosome's relationship is indicative of how it is progressing - one of whoring, blackmail and debauchery. If this is the case, it cannot end well for any of them in the long term.

History has shown that characters and organisations like these inevitably fall.

Good.

There was once a rumour that Invictus game photos where Smeg is directing the cameras is where she told Harry that they had videos of him doing stuff that if it came out would ruin him/family. They think the videos maybe came from Soho house. Which would tie in if it was brothel.... it wasn’t really a first day.. Harry arranged a “date” it was Meghan, she filmed & they tried to blackmail him at the games. Hence why he looked so worried in some of the pictures. Again, totally a rumour but might hold some water depending how foily your hat is.

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Soho House is masquerading as a high class brothel!

It's members, such as the gruesome twosome who met there on their dates, are "associating" in rooms which are decorated in wallpaper which have genatalia and pornographic images woven into the leaves of the pattern - no doubt considered "art" or artistic" by the members.

This Markus Anderson chap who appears to be very influential both in Soho House and their relationship, to my mind, seems no better than a pimp! The basis of the gruesome twosome's relationship is indicative of how it is progressing - one of whoring, blackmail and debauchery. If this is the case, it cannot end well for any of them in the long term.

History has shown that characters and organisations like these inevitably fall.

Good.

Very true, and your last sentence! The blackmail is continuing with them trying to subjugate the RF. The debauchery of their secret sniggering to each other about pornographic words uttered by their "son". Their sleazy acquaintances, and the pair of them pimping themselves out and selling our RF to anyone to earn a few bucks. All based on lies.
It's very fitting that Prince Henry, Duke of Sussex and once officially titled Captain General of the Royal Marines, has now found his level in life. He is now officially titled Chimpo instead, in an empty think tank dressed in an acrylic onsie, flogging mental health "apps" that are so overpriced they are out of reach of many sufferers in genuine need....as pointed out by an ex-serviceman suffering PTSD...but who cares?!!

 

[MillicentMargaret]

The Mail are running the story... ETA 'Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the claims made in a podcast '
(It's a straight account of Lady C's comments on her podcast - no additional reporting)

Lady Colin Campbell claims Princess Anne is royal accused of racism

Socialite Lady Colin Campbell has claimed the Queen's daughter Princess Anne is the royal Meghan and Harry accused of racism in their bombshell interview with Oprah

www.dailymail.co.uk

She added that Anne was concerned that Meghan may not 'actually have respect for the institution in to which she was marrying, and the family in which she was marrying'.

'Meghan and Harry have used that genuine concern of a loving aunt, knowing that because she is down to earth, experienced, modest, intelligent and sensible, and that you cannot make a sow's ear into a silk purse.

'Nobody is the guilty party in terms of racism. But Princess Anne was the champion in terms of 'don't marry that girl, she is unsuitable. She is wrong for the country, wrong for the job. Well, it's turned out to be true.

The thing is Anne is low key very popular right now but in the 90s and early 2000s she had a lot of unpopularity because she was seen as snootier than her mother, ugly (she's definitely not!) and her dogs attacked at least two other dogs. I don't think she cares about social media or Sugars but I'm not sure she's bullet proof. It's possible she actually said this but it's also possible Lady C is just passing on gossip that doesn't have a great source and it's not very fair. It's also possible she's taking one for the team.

I just don't want her to have to retire in "disgrace" and be lumped in with her younger brother if the media savages her over it.

 

[JAR21]

Personally I don't think that Lady C should have outed Anne at all. In my view that was a big misjudgment.

I'm sure every single member of the family had reservations about Snarkle. Naming anyone will inevitably cause a backlash in the media.

Anne is a strong lady and would probably take one for the team to take the heat off Charles but it seems really unfair.

Unless Lady C was given the ok to say what she did?

ETA Her sources must be pretty good or she would have run into issues with her books. And she did say this has 3 sources.

 

[Sunshine&clouds]

The thing is Anne is low key very popular right now but in the 90s and early 2000s she had a lot of unpopularity because she was seen as snootier than her mother, ugly (she's definitely not!) and her dogs attacked at least two other dogs. I don't think she cares about social media or Sugars but I'm not sure she's bullet proof. It's possible she actually said this but it's also possible Lady C is just passing on gossip that doesn't have a great source and it's not very fair. It's also possible she's taking one for the team.

I just don't want her to have to retire in "disgrace" and be lumped in with her younger brother if the media savages her over it.

Princess Anne is as hard as nails. I wouldn't be surprised if she said something that was blunt and tactless and I also wouldn't be surprised if she fell on her sword. Either way she doesn't give a toss about what anyone says or thinks about her. She's practicing her 'naff offs' as we speak. She saw off Donald Trump. A bunch of psychotic sugars won't worry her.

 

[Baguette]

Unless Lady C was given the ok to say what she did?

That's my instinct as well. It diffuses the whole comment as people know Princess Anne and exactly what she is likely to have said re her dim nephew's plans to marry a grifting divorcee actress.

Mail still moderating comments and also the Sussex Nuts aren't touching this topic on Twitter.

 

[Evangelina]

They were not at Soho on their first date, not sure where the rumor comes from.
They were at 5 Hertford street.

 

[Vanelope]

That's my instinct as well. It diffuses the whole comment as people know Princess Anne and exactly what she is likely to have said re her dim nephew's plans to marry a grifting divorcee actress.

Mail still moderating comments and also the Sussex Nuts aren't touching this topic on Twitter.

That’s interesting. They can attack Andrew, which doesn’t bother me, but don’t go for Anne.

 

[JAR21]

That's my instinct as well. It diffuses the whole comment as people know Princess Anne and exactly what she is likely to have said re her dim nephew's plans to marry a grifting divorcee actress.

Mail still moderating comments and also the Sussex Nuts aren't touching this topic on Twitter.

They won’t do, because nothing racist was said. They’re not interested in the truth, just like Smeg and Scabies.

That’s interesting. They can attack Andrew, which doesn’t bother me, but don’t go for Anne.

Well Andrew is just stupid. Even if he did nothing untoward, he was stupid enough to continue associating with Epstein and even worse, in public.

 

[pellegrino]

Re Lady C's comment that it was ANNE WOT SAID IT. I agree that Lady C would have been given the ok and Buckingham Palace always say no comment if the story is true. It's taken the heat out of the who made the racist comment storm, so I think that it was a good move. Anne will give no fucks at all.
Re the Welby comment, I think that it's weird and unsettling, I was thinking of Charles and Camilla, they, as divorced people couldn't be married in a CofE church. They married in Windsor Guildhall and had a blessing in Windsor chapel. HMTQ didn't attend the first but did attend the second ceremony. How come Markle as a divorcee was allowed to marry in Church?

 

[WadieHaddadsChocolates]

Agree. I also think she's pretty bulletproof amongst the public - no drama, Olympian, kids seem switched on decent sorts, kidnapped and told kidnapper off. Hard not to like her.

Oh, the attempted kidnapping! I doubt the Sugars or a lot of younger people even know about that.

BBC ON THIS DAY | 20 | 1974: Kidnap attempt on Princess Anne

Not reported in that article was this classic exchange between Ball and Anne:

Kidnapper after shooting several people: GET OUT OF THE CAR!
Princess Anne: Not bloody likely!

Anne showed total sangfroid, balls and nerves of steel and didn't let it affect her life and public service thereafter although it must have been pretty bloody scary to contemplate in an era when there were multiple groups from various countries, often financially backed by the Soviet and GDR states operating in the UK and Europe. Kidnappings that often ended in murder, airline hijackings and bombings existed as a constant threat. the Queen's own cousin was the victim of one bomb plot a few years after this event with Anne. And there's Smeg and Hazno whining insincerely about 'security' and being terrified of life and cameras (lol). Losers.

Woman has guts for miles and has worked diligently her whole adult life for charities, with 50 years work for Save the Children alone at this point. She was nominated for a Nobel Prize 30 years ago. She recycles her good quality clothes endlessly instead of spending frivolously on fashion - she's been seen recycling outfits from 30-40 years ago at public events. She embodies the sense of duty of her mother, and seems impervious to trend and fashion. I think most British people admire people who speak bluntly and to the point like Anne does to people trotting out fluffy inspirational candy floss platitudes with little substance behind them.