Isn't it? How can it be "hugely astute" to marry the spare, piss off one of the most powerful brands in the world, and live by bumming around billionaire friends houses ? As opposed to, say, getting your "hugely astute" brain to work inside said powerful brand to help it modernise and shine a light on causes that you care about ? An undergraduate degree from a decent-but-not-elite Uni is hardly evidence of a keen intellect, especially when it was promptly fucked off to make a living as a bit-part actress.
Prince Harry is trying to 'keep up with very bright' Meghan Markle
Speaking to The Telegraph, celebrity agent Jonathan Shalit said the Duke of Sussex, 36, may be trying to put himself on par with the 'hugely astute' Duchess, 39.www.dailymail.co.uk
bleeping hilarious!!
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
"Meghan and Harry Plus One": How to watch CBS special on royal couple and new baby Archie
Gayle King traveled to London ahead of the birth of the newest royal
www.cbsnews.com
Gayle was actually there, same with TMZ distributing from the start things like
Chars first school day-Meghan thank you notes from Tonga
Kate and Wills Pakistan Mosque - Meghan throwback kissing Archie with Tutu
There was a parallel "royaling" barelly noticable in UK and Europe.
That confirms what I’ve always thought. I’ve never bought the surrogacy idea. Both versions of Archie’s certificate floating around have 17 spaces. The parental birth laws were passed in 2009, I know that, so the 2010 info is likely current and correct. I mean, there’s plenty of other bloody weird stuff about his birth and IVF was clearly used but I did always think she looked pregnant. Of course there’s still no proof she is the genetic mother, why would she tell her ex-husband she couldn’t have children if there wasn’t some big issue. But I did always believe she was the birth mother.
"RF ....prejudice against couples struggling with fertility issues".Thank you. This is exactly what I wanted to find. Has this been publicly debated a great deal then?
The RF must know by now whether or not there really was a surrogate involved - for one thing, the courtiers must be all over Tattle and BG (welcome, friends - please tell us all you know).The press must be hot on the trail too. But from the RF's POV, wouldn't there need to be a certain delicacy about how to use this info?
Big IF, of course, as nothing is proven, but if the surrogacy rumour is true, a sudden public revelation of the story and the subsequent wipe-out of any hopes that the American Prince & Princess will ever be line for the throne could cause a bit of a slapback, even among normal people. Once again, all over the world, there would be a Woke-athon about how the racist Royals' fossilised attitudes now include ageism and prejudice against couples struggling with fertility issues (even though Edward and Sophie were open about using IVF). Not content with worrying about the exact shade of a child's skin, and imprisoning and persecuting little Mentally-ill Meghan, they (and therefore we in the UK) would look even more backward, hidebound and oppressive.
If I were dealing with it, I'd be saying, 'Look, you two, the game is up. You can withdraw with dignity right now and relinquish titles and place in the succession. Lots of nice juicy options available to you, and we can make Montecito life sweet; or, we just let the story float out...'
Maybe they're waiting till they've rescued Hostage Harry though.
The issues that H&M have with the Royal Family have from day one solely involved prestige. Never fertility. It's always been about titles, position, money and status for them.
H&M have only themselves to blame for the charades they've put the public and the RF through by not being honest about the "pregnancies" and I think that any slapback will be against these two for being liars and a total waste of time and money for everyone. They have contributed absolutely zero and grabbed everything they can get their hands on, and now it's beginning to fall apart they are trying to blackmail the RF over the subterfuges that they themselves carried out on the RF and British public.
My theory surrounding the registration of the birth is that they didn't follow the legal rules that all the rest of us have to adhere to.
They paid someone a lot of money and had a strict contract in place. The baby was delivered and handed over, therefore the carrier didn't register the child. She probably only saw him when he arrived and that baby would have been whisked away within an hour.
There's even a chance that Archie wasn't born here but flown in by private jet. We wouldn't be any the wiser.
They paid someone a lot of money and had a strict contract in place. The baby was delivered and handed over, therefore the carrier didn't register the child. She probably only saw him when he arrived and that baby would have been whisked away within an hour.
There's even a chance that Archie wasn't born here but flown in by private jet. We wouldn't be any the wiser.
It proves nothing to me other than the fact that they do whatever they like.
Received yet another ‘do you know her????’ Comment today, ffs is that the best they’ve got
The mysterious second birth certificate has never been published in its complete form. We only got to see a very limited view. Draw your own conclusions about why not one single newspaper published the second birth certificate in full....
She disappeared for 2 months before birth, baby could be a US Citizen, and is the child of a US citizen, the surrogacy theory is somehow funny, Markle is someone that would birth 5 completly alone if it furthers her cause, so aside from padding after the Euginie and white bridezilla dress in Australia fiasco, I doubt it, it wouldn't be worth the risk IMHO.
Maybe we should try and order one ourselves?! Only costs £35 or so.The mysterious second birth certificate has never been published in its complete form. We only got to see a very limited view. Draw your own conclusions about why not one single newspaper published the second birth certificate in full....
I believe she is Archies birth mother. More for the post birth pictures, no new mother wants to show of that huge post baby bump, especially when it’s going to be published around the whole world. Wasn’t the most flattering ensemble, and I couldn’t imagine why she would’ve faked that. Also the few times we have seen Archies face he is clearly the same little boy so I cannot get on with all those conspiracy theories that he doesn’t really exist.
she is a manipulative controlling little weasel though and I really hope that she gets her just desserts one day.
,
And you know that you could take them down
Rise aboveReceived yet another ‘do you know her????’ Comment today, ffs is that the best they’ve got
And you know that you could take them down
I must admit that picture of her afterwards with Harry and Archie does make me think she did give birth to him. Unless she is very clever and had a fake after birth bump
Thats my general social media strategy, saves a lot of grief and arguments.
.... I am sorry I missed that..."
Our hunky attorney took a sex break during Court recess to hoist our pocket Hitler against a filing cabinet in this clip. He looks a well runt so don't know how he managed it but maybe he had a stool?
Shame you missed this heart warming scene so I've described it for you as best I can.
(LOL I deliberately misquoted you BIB!)
Last edited:
The bump was huge, over inflated and too high up.
Smeggy was crap with the moonbumps because she always fitted them to her dresses rather than fitting the dresses to the bump (as most women have to do).
Believe me there's nothing clever about this awful woman!
I agree. M wore a smaller moon bump in the Archie reveal, and it was lopsided and very high up, directly under her right rib cage in that white belted dress. Her face looks slightly swollen in the reveal pictures but honestly I wouldn’t put it past her for it to be a bit of intentional weight gain as well as a face full of dermal filler
I got lost in legal speak :
vardags.com
The late inclusion of HRH in the birth certificate, may also mean that weak Charles accepted later that the children recieve titles once he is king. Maybe the Harkles where initialy forbidden to list the HRH.
Viscount and Lady Weymouth take aristocracys first steps to surrogacy
In recent weeks, Viscount and Lady Weymouth have become the first members of the British aristocracy to have a baby born by surrogacy.
vardags.com
Sorry if this has already been put up but poor Meghan, no one in the Royal Family has spoken to her since the interview. What does she expect
Gayle King on How Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Feel About Royal Family's Response to Interview (elle.com)
Gayle King on How Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Feel About Royal Family's Response to Interview (elle.com)
Don't they claim in the interview, that they have spoken to the Queen, I could be wrong?
Goodness knows. Perhaps they are lying to Gayle King which wouldnt surprise me.
- Status