From memory they were Getty photos, several of them from the same day and there seems to have been a malfunction of the moonbump. There have been many strange-shaped photos over the months and these have been posted on this thread and talked about at great length. I've not got access to the most obvious ones but there's a link which someone kindly set up on this thread where you can find them.
Three sources apparently good ones. But whether or not they're reliable, the point is that she said it and imho should not have done so especially as she's got the measure of the toxic two. Allegedly. Makes you wonder.
That was my thinking too but Anne remarried in the church of Scotland because..... Divorced people couldn't marry in the church of England.... That was 1992 and Charles was 2005... Perhaps its changed now?
That confirms what I’ve always thought. I’ve never bought the surrogacy idea. Both versions of Archie’s certificate floating around have 17 spaces. The parental birth laws were passed in 2009, I know that, so the 2010 info is likely current and correct. I mean, there’s plenty of other bloody weird stuff about his birth and IVF was clearly used but I did always think she looked pregnant. Of course there’s still no proof she is the genetic mother, why would she tell her ex-husband she couldn’t have children if there wasn’t some big issue. But I did always believe she was the birth mother.
What kind of christening for the new baby do you think they will have
I like Baguette's Power Flex concept better than what I wrote!!I doubt that story, way too familiar - I would hope. Aside from that, the likelihood someone's going to contradict her is slight.
HOWEVER, of course she could have called - did she actually speak to anyone? Or just dial any old number, claim it was the direct line to The Queen and no one (except M) is the wiser.
I think she will be pushing out of her coochie on a highway, while strapping JCMH on baby booster, to drop him at Better up, as Haznoballs mustn't be having driving licence.
But the amendment states clearly what the changes are, and what sections of the original certificate the changes were made too, I think that it is about the titles being prominent.Super Injunction in play here perhaps?
She can always get a Walmart strap on
It's the "Harry" name. He's actually a "she". Confusing.Lol,I did!- no,it wasnt you
I must admit that picture of her afterwards with Harry and Archie does make me think she did give birth to him. Unless she is very clever and had a fake after birth bump
Sorry to be dim, I’m trying to catch up, but how does Lady C know definitely that it was Anne?
"Since been with Meghan my penis has shrunk to this size!"Time to catch upxx.
I leave this here for nowxx.
This is quite an old one before I had my photoshop app..
View attachment 507044
He's a POC woke male so he can say exactly what he wants and don't you dare challenge him!
vardags.com
Yes, but Autumn Phillips does not have a drop of black blood in her (to my [rather limited] knowledge) and is therefore white, so that wouldn't count as racism* (in today's woke society, anyway).
It's an Italian newspaper and he was giving an interview on everything going on in the lead up to Easter. He's not saying anything his office or The Sun hasn't already said basically. He didn't conduct a marriage ceremony and didn't sign a legal document knowing that he had performed another illegal one a few days before but isn't going to break confidentiality by saying what actually went on.
Don't they claim in the interview, that they have spoken to the Queen, I could be wrong?
