Meghan has delibrately targeted people that can't clarify their side due to privilege, there is a limit to what the people can say to defend themselves against her comments. AoC can't say much due to privilege, no one can discuss her medical records and call her out. The RF have a policy of never complain, never explain. It's a fucking disgrace that twatface Idris dares to comment about taking away her voice when the person doing that is Meghan herself.I hear that he had a telephone conversation today with Her Majesty The Queen.
I'm rather hoping she hinted strongly that it's time he retired.
I wish all of these prominent people would just tell the truth.
Even if they have made a boo-boo.
I can forgive someone who owns up and apologises sincerely.
If they dig themselves in deeper by trying to cover up a lie or mistake because they haven't got the guts, I think that's worse.
Just tell us what happened, you old goat and take the consequences.
FFS.
She's not pregnant this time either.That proves to me that she has never given birth before!! Sounds like the birth plan of a first time mum. Second child birth plan - give me all the drugs
What a woman.Since we're talking about the Mighty Anne, here's her talking about that kidnap attempt.
The Daily Mail headline says that Lady C said that it was Princess Anne that made the racist remark, that's what I mean. I don't think that Lady C should have gjven H&M this ammunition as it clearly states that Anne was racist in asking about Farky's skin colour, even though we know that Anne's comments will have been twisted to suit H&M's agenda. I still think it was a mistake, sanctioned by BP or not.Yes I know what you mean. Surely the entire family thought that Smeggy was a low rent grifter so no surprises there!
It's definitely not the same as actually making a racist remark.
Ditto!I dunno about that but I do know that I learned what true fear was when I had to do my 1st shit after having my woowoo stiched halfway upto my arse.
Yes you are right, but the headline says otherwise and I'm very surprised.There wasn't a racist comment. It was just Anne thinking she didn't have the right personality/ethos to fit with the Royal Family.
The more I think about it, the more I agree that the phrasing isn't quite right: '...I would have committed a serious criminal offence if I signed it knowing it was false. So make of that what you like about.' [sic]
That phrasing is designed to clear himself on the grounds of ignorance if it were to emerge he was told something after the signing. Taken with his weird catatonic silence all these weeks - when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to clear it all up - it makes me more suspicious, not less. Previously I just thought it was Malificent lying as usual. Now I think she has a 'receipt' of something, somewhere - and panicking Justin has been in a clueless blither over how to cook up a statement which pre-emptively protects himself in the event of a certain amount of shit hitting the fan.
the one that shat on her dressCarrier pigeon!
We all need to ‘re-learn’ (woke top 10 phrase) the definition of racism. Being inquisitive, complimentary or perhaps a bit ignorant is NOT RACISM.The Daily Mail headline says that Lady C said that it was Princess Anne that made the racist remark, that's what I mean. I don't think that Lady C should have gjven H&M this ammunition as it clearly states that Anne was racist in asking about Farky's skin colour, even though we know that Anne's comments will have been twisted to suit H&M's agenda. I still think it was a mistake, sanctioned by BP or not.
So,he now has two jobs in America does he?And harry is back on the path of playing down his titles. Just Call Me Harry unless it's in 30 font Arial.
Prince Harry 'drops his royal title' for new job at '£1.25bn' start-up firm
The Duke of Sussex has recently revealed he has started a new role as an executive at a start-up firm in Silicon Valley, and has dropped his royal title with his new co-workerswww.dailystar.co.uk
You mean the place where he deigns to let his co workers call him Harry but has Prince Harry Duke of Sussex plastered all over the place in case people forget?!And harry is back on the path of playing down his titles. Just Call Me Harry unless it's in 30 font Arial.
Prince Harry 'drops his royal title' for new job at '£1.25bn' start-up firm
The Duke of Sussex has recently revealed he has started a new role as an executive at a start-up firm in Silicon Valley, and has dropped his royal title with his new co-workerswww.dailystar.co.uk
Shes annoyed me, too! . Shes a nobody- who cares what she thinks or says? She can say what she likes, its all hot-air. They got Married at Windsor. No amount of la-la-la from twots like her can change facts.Sorry but Ive only just come on but I wanted to post this just in case you havent seen it. That Dr Shola woman really annoys me
Meghan Markle news: Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry defended over wedding claim | Royal | News | Express.co.uk
Go to any top uni in the UK and this is what all the social science lecturers are like. Woke, shouty, ignorant communist bullies with an agenda. Hiding in university libraries well into their forties, snowflakes with no ability to survive in the real world.Sorry but Ive only just come on but I wanted to post this just in case you havent seen it. That Dr Shola woman really annoys me
Meghan Markle news: Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry defended over wedding claim | Royal | News | Express.co.uk
Thats very worrying to hear thatGo to any top uni in the UK and this is what all the social science lecturers are like. Woke, shouty, ignorant communist bullies with an agenda. Hiding in university libraries well into their forties, snowflakes with no ability to survive in the real world.
I received a 52% mark on my dissertation (2019 graduation) because I refused to write a woke piece on sexual assault on uni campuses and how men need ‘re educating’. Won’t name the uni I attended but it wasn’t a shit one to say the least. It’s scary
Wokeness is a disease!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?