So she's got form for this sort of scurrilous behaviour?
So she's got form for this sort of scurrilous behaviour?I read that she told him she was pregnant so they had to marry, then she had a 'miscarriage'. His parents found out that the pregnancy had been a lie, so had the marriage annulled on grounds of deception.
I think her PR Shitstorm Sucks has told her to STFU. I bet they've been firefighting all round and exhausted staff have had enough !I'm getting a bit worried. Unless I missed something, The Mad Woman of Montecito has been quiet for over 24 hours. I imagine this is what it felt like waiting for a doodle_bug bomb that had stopped whistling to hit something, in WW2. Her wrath will be terrible to behold now that she's been debunked. What do we think.... threatened miscarriage, intruder, or kidnap attempt to get us all feeling sorry for our fav victim again?
I've never seen why the bloggers think there's some sort of secret squirrel conspiracy around Soho House, which is mostly full of media lawyers, agents and mid-level ITV and BBC telly people. Her off Celebrity Juice, him off EastEnders, that sort of thing. Markus's job was all about making sure the VIP members had a good time and keeping Prince Harry happy meant surrounding him with vodka and pretty girls. Not too complicated really.Megsy and Soho House - well worth a read
Megsy...and the Soho Factory! - jerseydeanne and friends
Few of us have commented on the elephant not in the room, Markus Anderson, Information Officer of Soho House. Marcus, per Megsy, is the one with all of the secrets of the Soho House hierarchy. He apparently reviews all applications; therefore, he knows everything worth knowing about the...jerseydeanne.com
'Few of us have commented on the elephant not in the room, Markus Anderson, Information Officer of Soho House. Marcus, per Megsy, is the one with all of the secrets of the Soho House hierarchy. He apparently reviews all applications; therefore, he knows everything worth knowing about the Membership. Marcus is privy to very personal/private/ info. From the application form (which I understand is highly detailed).
Very few insiders, Marcus being one of them, know what information they contain or what is discussed, even jokingly, about financial dealings, wife swapping stories, debauchery, whatever, when they consider the application at a membership meeting. One point that must have the Membership insane is Markus’s relationship with Megsy and that they are/were such close friends. Marcus would likely have passed along some interesting tidbits to her about the Membership. Unimportant, but relative, is that Marcus is gay. Therefore, the only intimate thing they would share on their dinner dates was gossip. Certainly not politics, global warming, investment, news of the day; none of these things, as both seem sadly lacking in any substantive thought on an intellectual level.'
Fascinating stuff! MaybeGhislaineMarcus has ghosted Smeggy!
No, it was a white version.TaDah!
Is that the same frock she wore to present Archie?
I've never seen why the bloggers think there's some sort of secret squirrel conspiracy around Soho House, which is mostly full of media lawyers, agents and mid-level ITV and BBC telly people. Her off Celebrity Juice, him off EastEnders, that sort of thing. Markus's job was all about making sure the VIP members had a good time and keeping Prince Harry happy meant surrounding him with vodka and pretty girls. Not too complicated really.
Exactly Right !I've had 3 children. There is NO WAY I would be wearing a white dress 2 weeks after giving birth. No way...
Yep, I reckon a kidnapping is just the kind of contemptible tactic Megs would pull.Smallbrook is saying what we've already said: that MM is going to fabricate a "kidnapping" of Archie to emphasize the security issue. The 2x imposter (who actually didn't get ino the property, I believe) was just a taster
Also he mentions something about a miscarriage that the RF ignored..... I don't think he is talking about the July 2020 one. I bet there was one supposedly around the time of the engagement. Just my tinhat talking
smallbrook seems to say it is in planning phase. honestly - I wouldn't put it past herYep, I reckon a kidnapping is just ghd kind of contemptible tactic Megs would pull.
Will it be before the new baby puts in an appearance?
I've got serious tinfoil hattery going on with this one, I can totally see it happening
Sadly the children are her meal ticket and the way for her to stay relevant - if she didn't have them and her and Harry divorced, she'd go back into obscurity.MM has played her cards badly, she’s down to her bedrock of threatening the unthinkable - she’s shown herself to be venal & untrustworthy. The RF are not obliged to grant the children further titles & would be wise not to as H&M (merch) are loose cannons.
The path home to Harry is open, but not to her. Possibly a deal might struck about the kids being partly brought up in the UK - boarding schools etc - & back to the US for holidays, but alas I can see that Harry may have to come home without them.
I read that early on too although it was then that having got pregnant she had an abortion and her husband and in-laws found out. Her mother-in-law is a well-respected socialite. They have stayed quiet about it.So she's got form for this sort of scurrilous behaviour?
yeah but its all pretence with her. She doesnt care what is truthful, she will push the Prince and Princess everywhere she goes. UGH, she will have Princess in tiaras by age 2. UGH.The US doesn’t recognize royal titles so on their US documents they will just be commoners like the rest of us simple folks.
Brings to mind the phrase "They'd spoil another couple"I can't decide about the divorce!
I want him to divorce her because she's such a vile, revolting, scheming individual, but on the other hand, he chose her and I think they deserve each other!
Oh yes, they each took one for their respective teams when they took themselves off the market for each other!I can't decide about the divorce!
I want him to divorce her because she's such a vile, revolting, scheming individual, but on the other hand, he chose her and I think they deserve each other!
But isn't Tyler Perry paying for their security? Harry had a police escort, in the James Corden interview? Wouldn't this implicate both Perry and the police?Yep, I reckon a kidnapping is just the kind of contemptible tactic Megs would pull.
Will it be before the new baby puts in an appearance?
I've got serious tinfoil hattery going on with this one, I can totally see it happening
Ok, my imagination is going into full flight of fancy here but if it's good enough for Smegatron...smallbrook seems to say it is in planning phase. honestly - I wouldn't put it past her
Meh Princess Anne already has the kidnapping badge, and hers was real and earnt.Yep, I reckon a kidnapping is just the kind of contemptible tactic Megs would pull.
Will it be before the new baby puts in an appearance?
I've got serious tinfoil hattery going on with this one, I can totally see it happening
If they keep playing the "We're unstable mentally" card it would raise an issue about the safety of an heir. Removing him from the line of succession might be less damaging to the monarchy then taking custody of him?Ok, my imagination is going into full flight of fancy here but if it's good enough for Smegatron...
What if, Archie is kidnapped and... Wills and Kate suddenly adopt a little boy of around two years of age!
(Cue Eastenders doof doofs)
I really don't think she gets either the connection to the monarchy of the British public or the role taxpayers play in supporting it. She's crying for titles and security but doesn't realise that security is paid for by the taxpayer and provided by a government institution. Plus the fact its literally illegal for the metropolitan police to proved long term protection on US soilIt's actualy not about the RF but the General Public and at this point, giving those 2 anything would be far more damaging to the Monarchy than anything said on the Oprah chat show.
It's something that Meghan never really understood about the RF, they are there by consent and the taxpayers fund them. Currently in my opinion the Royal Family are value for money hence why they still exist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?