Harry and Meghan #82 Duke of Hazzard & Lil MerMeg, no titles no cash, you'll just have to beg

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It was suspicious! He tried to make out it was to keep the interview on track.

Yet another sugar on the panel, who won't let anyone else have an opinion!
There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.

I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.

Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 36
There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.

I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.

Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...
BİB - İ'm thinking this would be to a worse opinion rather than a better opinion?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 18
It wasn't totally clear from the phrasing whether it was 'change for the worse'. I thought that was what he meant, personally.

Emily Andrews is not holding back any more...



ETA Notice she has witnesses who have confirmed that Kate cried at the fitting.....
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 49
There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.

I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.

Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...
I think if there was an injunction relating to the "birth" it will have been imposed by the Palace, and the motive at the time will have been to protect H&M and cover up for them. Now, who knows what will happen as H&M have blown away their protection.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 24
For those interested there's a programme on on Ch5 on now Inside Kensington palace
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Also that H&M wanted to be part of the Palace workplace shake-up. Not surprisingly they've been rejected and been told it's a Palace and senior Royals operation. Bet Minge is fuming. BP confirmed that the shakeup wasn't reactive to the Porka interview. Apologies if already posted, too.
The entitlement, delusion and self-centered narcissism is just on another level. Why do they even think anybody would be interested in their thoughts on Palace matters at this point :oops:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 28
There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.

I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.

Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...
Well journalists' articles are looked through with a fine legal toothcomb before publishing by whatever media company. Peeps live on air can't be checked so it is best to avoid going down the route particularly in the case of a Bill Turnbull-type interview.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
Just read in the Sun that TM has consulted lawyers and hopes to file a lawsuit against the 5 friends who libelled him in People. From memory Minge named them in legal documents, so they do exist. Don't know if this has already been posted?

Also that H&M wanted to be part of the Palace workplace shake-up. Not surprisingly they've been rejected and been told it's a Palace and senior Royals operation. Bet Minge is fuming. BP confirmed that the shakeup wasn't reactive to the Porka interview. Apologies if already posted, too.
What part of “you’re out” can’t that pair of muppets understand? FFS🤪
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 31
“The reason we didn't go public is the trustees took a view that she was like Marmite and there could be reputational issues - people not liking our charity because they don't like her - so we decided to keep the donation secret.

'After the interview we realised we're a poverty and race organisation [and] that we needed to show solidarity.'

Show solidarity? To who, what or whom? Their organisation? Their client base? The Queen and Royal Family? Markle?
The cat’s mother? 🤷‍♀️
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 23
It wasn't totally clear from the phrasing whether it was 'change for the worse'. I thought that was what he meant, personally.

Emily Andrews is not holding back any more...



ETA Notice she has witnesses who have confirmed that Kate cried at the fitting.....
Ellie Hall is a "journalist" at buzz feed who only writes ass kissing articles about HnM. Bet she's another paid pr
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 24
There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.

I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.

Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...
So where would Tom Bower stand in relation to a super injunction and his book?


Re the titles - we need to be able to have them added to the poll and only vote when we get to page 40 or something similar. Or put options forward, to start a poll when we get to page 40?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
So next Wednesday is D day...Departure of titles hopefully! I hope there is some information about this review rather than silence from RF
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.