#83 told so many lies don’t know where it will stop, one things for sure we are still a couple of knobs
There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.It was suspicious! He tried to make out it was to keep the interview on track.
Yet another sugar on the panel, who won't let anyone else have an opinion!
BİB - İ'm thinking this would be to a worse opinion rather than a better opinion?There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.
I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.
Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...
I think if there was an injunction relating to the "birth" it will have been imposed by the Palace, and the motive at the time will have been to protect H&M and cover up for them. Now, who knows what will happen as H&M have blown away their protection.There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.
I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.
Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...
The entitlement, delusion and self-centered narcissism is just on another level. Why do they even think anybody would be interested in their thoughts on Palace matters at this pointAlso that H&M wanted to be part of the Palace workplace shake-up. Not surprisingly they've been rejected and been told it's a Palace and senior Royals operation. Bet Minge is fuming. BP confirmed that the shakeup wasn't reactive to the Porka interview. Apologies if already posted, too.
I'm quietly tattling in the corner while Mr Pops has the grand prix on at inter-galactic volume...For those interested there's a programme on on Ch5 on now Inside Kensington palace
Tattling is way more interesting ! And quieter....I'm quietly tattling in the corner while Mr Pops has the grand prix on at inter-galactic volume...
Oh my, the comments on that article!
Well journalists' articles are looked through with a fine legal toothcomb before publishing by whatever media company. Peeps live on air can't be checked so it is best to avoid going down the route particularly in the case of a Bill Turnbull-type interview.There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.
I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.
Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...
My favourite comment "more people like marmite than Meghan"Oh my, the comments on that article!
We need a marmite emoji for such an occasion
What part of “you’re out” can’t that pair of muppets understand? FFSJust read in the Sun that TM has consulted lawyers and hopes to file a lawsuit against the 5 friends who libelled him in People. From memory Minge named them in legal documents, so they do exist. Don't know if this has already been posted?
Also that H&M wanted to be part of the Palace workplace shake-up. Not surprisingly they've been rejected and been told it's a Palace and senior Royals operation. Bet Minge is fuming. BP confirmed that the shakeup wasn't reactive to the Porka interview. Apologies if already posted, too.
Ellie Hall is a "journalist" at buzz feed who only writes ass kissing articles about HnM. Bet she's another paid prIt wasn't totally clear from the phrasing whether it was 'change for the worse'. I thought that was what he meant, personally.
Emily Andrews is not holding back any more...
ETA Notice she has witnesses who have confirmed that Kate cried at the fitting.....
So where would Tom Bower stand in relation to a super injunction and his book?There's something out there like an injunction/super-injunction that relates to the Archie birth, isn't there? The other TV interview was the one with Kevin McGuire of the Mirror, who also got a 'moving quickly along' from the host when he referred to secrets that might be revealed during the trial, that would change everyone's opinion of Meghan.
I wonder if the Royal Reporters were asked not to write about the vile SussexSquad whilst Harkles were still in RF, but now they are free to write about it? It feels as if something has shifted post-Oprah, or maybe it's to do with the 12 month review period ending.
Agree that putting the thread suggestions in a poll doesn't really work out, does it? As we were, Tattlers...