And there's this too
This is what makes me think that all of the stuff they said was specifically designed to paint them out as victims when they know full well they aren’t, and appeal to people who are not well informed about the RF.“I never thought I’d have my security removed, because I was born into this position”
I remember these. Extremely good lookalikes tbf! Unlike these I posted last night
Those are not real are they ?
the general consensus is 1) security (to pick up their dry cleaning, make Smeggy look important with her cavalry of armoured Range Rovers, and increasing the running costs and post-divorce "maintenance" calculations, 2) money, endless amounts of money without any obligations behind it - sent to MM's account on Vanuatu, and 3) Titles, military titles, patronages and titles for the kids. Pronto. It is likely that they also want an official apology from HMTQ, Chuck, Kate and William. My belief is that will not satisfy them (nothing has - not even a $35m wedding) and what they REALLY want is that in recognition of their out-of-datedness and Woke-standard irrelevance, they issue a groveling acceptance of their evil racism and that TQ, Chuck and William all abdicate and ask that Harry comes back and takes the throne - giving MM the Sceptre and keys to the Crown Jewels/Tiara safes + Bucks PalaceAND Windsor. That is my tinhat theory
ITV seem to have read the room today. First GMB and then later on Schofe came out(what, again?) against the Sussexes....
They are quite good lookalikes. It might have been better if he did marry Pippa.
Touché woko!
Not sure just seen it on PinterestThose are not real are they ?
The line was cost cutting, but it was actually a security risk for the family.I think taking away Britannia was a hint that we can take everything away if we choose.
Not for Pippa - she has a billionaire with a family hotel in the Caribbean and a large estate and title in Scotland. What would Harry offer? Nothing.They are quite good lookalikes. It might have been better if he did marry Pippa.
I didn't mean it from a social class, so much as classy versus trashy.I don't think it's for a certain class. I would loathe for my family goings on to be discussed in public and I imagine many people are the same. And I am definitely not upper class. You can tell just by looking at my back garden (NOT urban dictionary
They are lookalikesThose are not real are they ?
My husband is in his 60s and used to be a punk rocker. Nobody in my age group would ever listen to Daniel O'Donnell! What a fricking insult!That might be a bit generous. Daniel O'Donnell was very popular amongst middle-aged woman 25 years ago. Unless 65 is the new 40 ?
No, I think she’s more than happy with the edit.I didn't watch the actual interview because the pair of them sicken me. For those people who did - is there anyway that Megain can claim it was edited to make her look bad and she didn't actually say the things that people are saying she did?
I reckon that's what she'll go for if she can. 'Even Oprah was against me!!!' Wail,wail wail.
So insensitive... they should have postponed it till then knew PP was ok. Anyone with a shred of decency would.Sharon is being cancelled, isn't she?
I missed this comment from Gayle on CBS morning show yesterday, but think it was part of her Harkle discussion. Not content with talking about private conversations with Prince Charles and William, she then goes on to talk about CBS plans for the death of Prince Philip (thankfully he is with us still). It's just a disgrace.
"Well, just so you know, they had done that interview before Prince Phillip went into the hospital, and if something, God forbid, had happened to him, the interview would not have run at this particular time," she said.
"But the interview was done and was scheduled before he went into the hospital. But a lot of people have raised that point."
Meghan and Harry agreed to cancel Oprah interview if Prince Philip died
Prince Philip, 99, was photographed waving as he arrived at Windsor on Tuesday following his discharge from hospitalwww.birminghammail.co.uk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?