Welcome to Thread 49!
Thread title by @margaretta with 39 likes!
Carrying on from here
Harry & Meghan #48 Malicious Meg thought she knew better, getting help with her letter
I can only imagine that if a Disney film included a miscarriage, her description is exactly how it would be . I’m suprised forest animals weren’t there to lift her to her feet whilst she hummed bravely , staring into yonder ...tattle.life
Please can thread title suggesters try to put the words "thread title" somewhere in the post or at least "title" as otherwise it is really hard to find the suggestions when creating the new thread! Tea trays will fly all over the place if a good suggestion gets overlooked because it didn't come up in the search
In the last pages of the last thread we learnt that poor privacy-seeking Meghan announced her miscarriage to the globe through an article that she vomited up to the New York Times herself. When asked for a comment about it Buck House responded rather tellingly that they were "saddened by the announcement" and left it at that. See what they did there?
I've just seen this on the Mail, I'm not sure why charities are praising her, since she had the opportunity to point sufferers at any number of these charities but didn't, she kept it all about her and only her. Maybe they think she will become their patron if they praise her? Will these charities never learn
![]()
Charity bosses praise Meghan Markle for 'breaking down the stigma'
Charity groups today applauded Meghan Markle for 'breaking down that stigma and shame' around miscarriage after she revealed she had lost her second baby over the summer.www.dailymail.co.uk
It's not a taboo subject, you are right. Made me angry to see her claiming that it was shameful as well - no, it isn't and never has been.I’m so sorry to read of all the women on here who have suffered the horrible ordeal of a miscarriage. I am so sorry to all of you to you that you had to go through that.
I do have a question though I hope it doesn’t sound insensitive but I’ve seen Megan and some others saying she is removing the ‘shame’ and ‘taboo’ around miscarriage, and it’s taken me by surprise as I didn’t think there was shame and taboo around miscarriage? Obviously grief, upset , trauma etc - but a taboo subject? Maybe someone else can educate me on this as I found the wording jarring.
I'm sure the NHS worker's are lining up to give hero Harry a clap tonight for that 4 hour shiftMore Hero Harry PR from Omid on the HeirPod podcast, implying there are more charity stunts thathave been filmed for Netflixhave been done 'secretly'.
That's the Harkle definition of secret, which means your PR phones up Omid Scobie with all of the boring details. We are supposed to be impressed that a fit, healthy 35 year old man did 4 hours of work on a day that was 'really quite hot'Is Harry is still on the type of Visa that doesn't allow him to work, which is why they keep saying 'volunteer'? Is anyone impressed by an ex-royal shifting a few boxes for the cameras?
![]()
Prince Harry 'puts in four-hour shift' helping veterans in California
PRINCE HARRY has been praised for the secret volunteer work he has been doing for the vulnerable in California.www.express.co.uk
Was Meghan expecting her 'confidential reason' to get leaked, so in the end she had to put out her own publicity?
I've been very upset with all my miscarriages and also my stillborn child I just chose to keep it private. Your IVF comment is utter twaddle no one has the right to quantify peoples upset dependant on how they conceived!A lot of people on here have asked how on earth Hazno and her douchness Meghan are still together.
This miscarriage gives the perfect reason! How could Harry leave his wife if she has just miscarried? (And how could he leave if they are still trying to get pregnant!! Its the kind of thing even Harry couldnt do and get away with it!! And sympathies to anyone who has ever had a miscarriage, but the only people I have ever heard get this upset about a miscarriage, are those going through IVF, where the disappointments can be even more acute, and the failures become more significant!
But actually although the NYT article has ended up being all about the miscarriage, I dont think it was written for this! I think it was written to make people feel sorry for poor victimised Meghan. No one asking her if she is OK, The rest of the article talks about how this year has shown that the world is full of lies and no one knows what the truth is anymore...she even uses the example of how truth is confused to talk about Trump refusing to believe the election results....
The poor woman is being attacked by the nasty Daily Mail, and they are making her life impossible by refusing to believe her version of the truth, and refusing to back down and let her get away with her version of how she percieved her letter to her father.
Its almost funny that the point of the article has been so blatantly missed by the press- and they are just focussing on a tiny part of the article!!