I'm so glad that it was Kate who got the Diana ring and not meghan, her scrawny hands wouldn't have been able to pull of that gorgeous sapphire.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yes, agree totally. But they didn't do that apparently. And I know what you mean, my stepmother was on Lithium years ago, but that's another story.
She looks effortlessly stunning there.Radiant even.
Looks like she's had lots of highlights done and the resulting colour really uplifts her whole look. Clear images too, no hiding behind fuzzy focus and she still looks flawless and speaks clearly and engagingly.
Hark, I doth hear the sound of smashing cups wafting on the autumn breeze from montecito.
Wow ! Kate looks like a movie star in that latest Natural History Museum vid. {That hair 
!!}
#Royal glamour # Hollywood glamour #Catherine nails it. Again.
She did sound a little more nervous than usual - not surprising given they must know the stakes. If H&M are reading every negative comment you can be damned sure the "men in grey" suits and their administrative teams have their finger on the pulse of "monarchy vs. anarchy" in the online world.
Anway..... Take that Kween of Cheapfake!
She must be screaming like a banshee. I pity poor Archiedoll and Lapdog tonight.
There is just no comparison between Catherine...the epitome of grace and good humour, and the Kween of Pitstains. One will be Queen of the realm, the other....by then....will have a few lunatic middle-aged SUGARZ and ??
!!}#Royal glamour # Hollywood glamour #Catherine nails it. Again.
She did sound a little more nervous than usual - not surprising given they must know the stakes. If H&M are reading every negative comment you can be damned sure the "men in grey" suits and their administrative teams have their finger on the pulse of "monarchy vs. anarchy" in the online world.
Anway..... Take that Kween of Cheapfake!
She must be screaming like a banshee. I pity poor Archiedoll and Lapdog tonight.
There is just no comparison between Catherine...the epitome of grace and good humour, and the Kween of Pitstains. One will be Queen of the realm, the other....by then....will have a few lunatic middle-aged SUGARZ and ??
@freda19 oops bit of a cross post, sorry. Great minds think alike though!!
I do love coloured stones but they can make engagement rings look very similar to cocktail rings. Especially as they look better as big solitaires in my opinion. Kate’s and Sarah‘s work (basically the same design) but Eugenie‘s sadly doesn’t.
The younger all diamond rings look nice but also a bit ordinary. Still massively beautiful though and I prefer an all diamonds look for the everyday. Meghan’s ring is nice, inoffensive and quite classic. Nothing to criticise but also nothing to praise. Camilla’s ring though- it looks not very nice on photos as the setting swallows the sparkle- but it sticks out and sparks an interest. It is a massive piece previously worn by Queen Elizabeth, the Queen mother. I wonder if it feels really good to wear her ring as engagement ring after all the scheming that happened in this case.
@Facehugger there is a great costume on other thread that you would love.You can buy baseball caps with them on - someone bought me one at work
I knew I'd seen that look somewhere before. She was clearly auditioning for the Robert Palmer video Addicted to Love.
She failed because of her chicken legs being too scrawny. Everything she touches
But hazza looks smarter than usual in his audition.
Prince Harry ‘appalled’ to find ‘something rotten in royalty’
Prince Harry’s thoughts on the royal family have changed dramatically over the last couple of years and in time the prince has come to realise that “there was something rotten”...
www.thenews.com.pk
Rotten little traitor
So I was googling "why is Meghan's webcam always blurry" to see if there were any clues to what they were hiding, and this unrelated story about the Christmas card featuring Merchiedoll popped up. I had not seen this story before. I've always thought it was suspect, but thought the con about it was that Merchie is her friend's kid that she was borrowing for this photo and the South Africa trip.
But according to the theory in this article, in the first version of the card that was released, Sparkles was in much sharper focus than Haznoballs, leading people to suggest she had been photoshopped onto it. Apparently the image was rereleased with Markle blurred a bit to match Hazno.
www.dailymail.co.uk
But according to the theory in this article, in the first version of the card that was released, Sparkles was in much sharper focus than Haznoballs, leading people to suggest she had been photoshopped onto it. Apparently the image was rereleased with Markle blurred a bit to match Hazno.
Was Meghan Markle's face PHOTOSHOPPED onto Christmas e-card?
Meghan's face appears significantly more in focus than that of Prince Harry in the photograph shared online, despite them both being roughly the same distance behind Archie.
Oooh, where? Tell me please
All I can hear in my head now is Robert Palmer singing 'gonna have to face it, you're addicted to Cun..........' oh never mind!I knew I'd seen that look somewhere before. She was clearly auditioning for the Robert Palmer video Addicted to Love.
She failed because of her chicken legs being too scrawny. Everything she touches
But hazza looks smarter than usual in his audition.
Last edited:
I know from personal experience that medication has a real role in helping climb out of the pit that is depression. I was prescribed Prozac, new at the time. (It was a one off and a long-time ago.)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...uss-courageous-leadership-virtual-summit.html
Omg, another bowl of word salad with a side order of horseshit coming up, I see
Omg, another bowl of word salad with a side order of horseshit coming up, I see
My guess is that Meghan didn't like her face in the original shot (perhaps she had her eyes closed?) so used another photo from the same shoot. The more people in a photo the harder it is to get a photo with everyone looking good.So I was googling "why is Meghan's webcam always blurry" to see if there were any clues to what they were hiding, and this unrelated story about the Christmas card featuring Merchiedoll popped up. I had not seen this story before. I've always thought it was suspect, but thought the con about it was that Merchie is her friend's kid that she was borrowing for this photo and the South Africa trip.
But according to the theory in this article, in the first version of the card that was released, Sparkles was in much sharper focus than Haznoballs, leading people to suggest she had been photoshopped onto it. Apparently the image was rereleased with Markle blurred a bit to match Hazno.
Was Meghan Markle's face PHOTOSHOPPED onto Christmas e-card?
Meghan's face appears significantly more in focus than that of Prince Harry in the photograph shared online, despite them both being roughly the same distance behind Archie.
View attachment 273870
It's a crap picture anyway. Its supposed to be cute but it really isn't. Typical Harkles fakeness personified
I love Eugenie's!
@Miscanthus
Bald as a coot Harry.
xx
I was going to try and use the top of the coots head for Harry's head but it had alot more bright red feathers on top, so I've added Harry's head on a baby coot instead lol
xx
Bald as a coot Harry.
xxI was going to try and use the top of the coots head for Harry's head but it had alot more bright red feathers on top, so I've added Harry's head on a baby coot instead lol
I make that for you now
xxOooh, where? Tell me please
Ok, snapshot of post from the other tattle.
Looks great, and evidentally there are more. Smeg and h arewhat Freda says
Absolutely fabulous PomBear@Miscanthus
Bald as a coot Harry.
I was going to try and use the top of the coots head for Harry's head but it had alot more bright red feathers on top, so I've added Harry's head on a baby coot instead lol
View attachment 273962
I make that for you now
Last edited:
For the love of god.... what is she going to be able to tell us about courageous leadership?? I can’t bear it.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...uss-courageous-leadership-virtual-summit.html
Omg, another bowl of word salad with a side order of horseshit coming up, I see
Meghan Markle to discuss 'courageous leadership' during virtual summit
The Duchess of Sussex is due to take part in the Fortune's Most Powerful Women Next Gen Virtual Summit on Tuesday.
I'd rather rub tit into an open wound than listen to her mumbojumbo
Love that description! I have the same, but have found it to be useful at times, particularly when someone is boring! Nothing stops people wittering on more quickly, than when they notice one of my eyes is staring over their shoulder, while the other is apparently looking at their face. I only realise when they start repeatedly looking behind them, to see what I am so focused on
- Status