Newspaper reader comments sections say the Sussex attacks have "made the king and Catherine ill." But imo they are two very different situations.BIB
they're common criminals and blackmailers, narcs for good measure.
I've not seen any anti-Monarchy sentiment on this thread, quite the opposite.
Yes, thank you. This bears repeating.
In one way or another, we're here because we support the Monarchy, frustrating though it is at times.
We don't support abusers, bullies, liars, exploiters, fraudsters and freeloaders.
If Chuck is ill with stress, what's making him ill is the fraud underpinning the Stoat situation, and I believe that if he could permanently ditch his son with the stroke of a pen he would but he daren't. He's never been attacked by the Stoats anyway, just by confused people like us wondering what's going on.
The new Sussex website prominently features the Flatpack ties to the Monarchy as Prince and Princess. Imagine being Chuck and knowing that he's responsible for their legitimacy. Him alone, but there's nothing he can do as calls for explanations grow louder. I think the new Sussex website is not to do with podcasts and Archewholes, it's to further establish the children and when this is over I believe that this is what we'll find it always was.
No wonder C's stressed. He's allowed the Sussexes a platform and protection from exposure for years so what can he expect but that they'd use it ruthlessly? As a result he appears to be a passive bystander and gets flak. Less now because he's ill, but he's still responsible for protecting the Monarchy from harm and has MiG to act for him but he won't.
Catherine is blameless, and the attacks on her have been sanctioned and permitted for reasons I can't understand. No clap-back from the Palace or threats of legal action when "THEY" threaten George with physical harm (his uncle and his wife, that is).