Exactly I'm watching it right now and interpreting it with my thoughts and opinions.It's good to see it live with no biased reporter editing it
Exactly I'm watching it right now and interpreting it with my thoughts and opinions.It's good to see it live with no biased reporter editing it
A really good question!Hi all, long time lurker here (another one from the Jack Monroe threads who is bored by her lack of antics!).
I have a question re the fake pregnancy thing (which I’m on the fence about). A lot of the speculation is based on the fact that her bump seemed to get bigger/smaller on different days, but surely if she was faking she wouldn’t be stupid enough to wear a particular fake bump size one day and then a smaller one the week after, for example? Surely she’d be doing everything possible to keep the pretence going, not mixing up bump sizes and therefore making people suspicious?
If Invictus did pay for their Valentines dinner this just confirms that they are completely broke.Just read online that apparently IG paid for their Valentine dinner
Am still recoveringYes, you were papped totally distraught just after the site went down! I hope you are OK now.
View attachment 2761963
Photo: Al-Jazeera
Try in here:A really good question!
I was on the fence for years too until I saw the clip where her moonbump very visibly pops back into rounded shape after she'd been bending forward. (I'll see if I can find it for you....apologies, I can't find the clip in the archives, will look back over the last few threads, it's more than convincing. Meanwhile, have posted a still from the event below.)
She wouldn't be stupid enough to wear wrong sized bumps?? She'd pay more attention to details?
Well, not really...this is Smegs. A woman like no other. She is soooo perfect that she doesn't need to check minutiae. She knows that everyone adores her regardless of how she looks!
In the real world, Smegs has almost pathological difficulty with details...
Let's remember some of her lapses:
- Getting off a plane on an official visit, her red dress has the price tag hanging from it.
- Numerous times: her pantaloons are too long and trailing in the dirt, even fraying.
- Numerous times: she wears hideous clothes that are usually too big or too small.
- Numerous times: she puts her lashes on with huge gobbits of glue and isn't concerned that this dried on gloop looks so yuk and is often picked up by the cameras.
- Several times she's been on formal visits and her stiletto heels have been dirty or muddied.
- The Canadian park pap walk - she was too busy gurning away at the camera, completely careless that the baby carrier she was wearing wasn't on properly, the 'baby' or the dolly was falling out and, if human, would have been very uncomfortable with all the straps in the wrong place.
- It's obvious now to most women - and a growing number of men too - that she has no fashion sense and no sense of what to wear for the occasion (ballgowns in cinema fleapits?!)
- Th Moonbump that Fell Down.... on the Birkenhead/Liverpool visit, she must have loosened the velcro getting out of the car? Didn't see to bother her at all that her knees were now pregnant....
- Shudder....the pit stains in the brown top she wore to visit the Canadian Embassy.
I'm certain our friends here can add many more lapses to this list!
The point is that she is incapable of attending to the details of her dress - .
I think it follows that she wouldn't bother to check whether she's got the right size moonbump on. She is convinced that she's perfect and that you'll never notice!
Commonwealth Day Service, WestminsterAbbey 2019
View attachment 2762018
Probably because being with either of them is an adventure sport? It would be a challenge for a show like like Fear Factor (or whatever its name is, I don't watch those shows).Just read online that apparently IG paid for their Valentine dinner
Thank you, really needed that as a post-dinner snack I would have offered you butterscotch chocolate cake, but my phone deleted the photo and now the cake is half goneYes, yes, yes yes yes, and yes. SPOT ON. Have a Chessy Poof.
Her blinking is off the scale. She must be bricking it that she's got to mingle with people. And that she can't control her image in this liveHis whole body language has completely changed since he went back to stand with Meghan. He looks so uncomfortable around her and his smile has completely disappeared.
I'm not so sure as she's always been after freebiesIf Invictus did pay for their Valentines dinner this just confirms that they are completely broke.
She really doesn't like it when she isn't the centre of attention.Her blinking is off the scale. She must be bricking it that she's got to mingle with people. And that she can't control her image in this live
---
I'm not so sure as she's always been after freebies
Same here she's really annoyingUgh. I just cannot listen to Paula…she annoys the shyt out of me
His hair (or rather lack of it) looks bleeping dreadful that's little better than a comb over
They are just parasites. Whether it’s his family, commonwealth taxpayers, charities, media corporations, billionaire ‘friends’, Archewell donors, or suing the British media outlets - they bleed people dry to fund the privilege he has always known and cannot be without, and the life she never knew but very quickly became accustomed to.Just read online that apparently IG paid for their Valentine dinner
What is also clear that in all those decades as Royal , Harry never learned what ''working the crowd '' means.Couple of things I have noticed.
1. Why is she the only person in the crowd wearing gloves?
2. Harry hasn't even glanced at her once
3. She's just standing at the back not getting involved in the activities and still looks completely lost.
4. Harry looks far more comfortable and relaxed when he is not standing next to Meghan.
5. As soon as he went back to Meghan he immediately looked stressed and uncomfortable standing next to her.
I don't think they're egging on the Palace to take their titles at all, it's the last thing they want as their titles mean everything to them and their fake children. They know that C won't move against them and wouldn't even if he was super-fit. This is engagement, publicity and confrontation plus flaunting the Flatpacks.View attachment 2760028
Someone on here said the same yesterday, and I wholeheartedly agree that this is a tactical move to try and force the hand of the RF/UK Gov (like the letter to daddy that was only published after the five friends went to People magazine) to take their titles so they can dine out on more victimhood. Henceforth why they’ve hijacked Sussex as a faux surname beforehand so they can retain that to build their brand.
Lucky you did a screenshot. Now shows as not found.I wouldn't be surprised
Go back to the post and there's a screenshot thereLucky you did a screenshot. Now shows as not found.
@SunsetBeach sorry darling but Lady C actually said "More information to come Summer / Autumn 2024 or 2025".....then added ......"Possibly deffo Spring 2025 as my cats and myself are playing The Long Game...."That’s a surprisingly short timescale for a reveal from Lady C!