Ooh yes, great idea. Simon is younger. Tom can be Captain(literally) and Simon can be vice captain . (No smeggy that doesn't mean he controls the yacht girls ... get back in your box).
Both men are true heroes.
Ooh yes, great idea. Simon is younger. Tom can be Captain(literally) and Simon can be vice captain . (No smeggy that doesn't mean he controls the yacht girls ... get back in your box).Captain Tom and Simon Weston would both get my vote for Invictus going forward.
Maybe Zara and Mike Tindall.Sleeping with the Enemy is on a par with that!
My daily disgust level at these two has dropped another notch today, I have no words of any use that you lovelies haven't said already
Other than selling his former comrades down the river to please his fucksuck bint is despicable. Invictus needs a new champion. Any ideas?
Absolutely. Simon is also a true hero, for what he's suffered, overcome, and all his charity work. Which he does quietly and without any pomp and circumstance about it, he just gets on with it.Ooh yes, great idea. Simon is younger. Tom can be Captain(literally) and Simon can be vice captain . (No smeggy that doesn't mean he controls the yacht girls ... get back in your box).
Both men are true heroes.
Yes, those too, good shout X between us all, well have this job sorted by tomorrow, who needs Hazno hey!Maybe Zara and Mike Tindall.
They're both sporty types.
Cant wait to hear what William has to say about thisThe Dyson the dollars and Diana who?
No wonder they did no wordy elaborate tribute to Diana. They knew they were about to open up her grave and shit on her coffin with netflix holding the shovels. Treacherous cunts.
I don't reckon he will publicly say anything. If reports are right about the feud between the brothers, he'll keep his own counsel & his gunpowder dry, and let the Palace deal with it, all in their own good time. Must be sad to see his brother going the way he is, all led by a whiff of Merkin.Cant wait to hear what William has to say about this
I hate the times paywallIt's guesswork but this Invictus-linked event coming to light has rattled them based on today's PR frenzy.
There were so many things that the gruesome twosome did that I never questioned at the time but now you just kind of know how slippery they are, and how much they pre-planned this move to the USA.
Oh here we go. The Duke of Litigation is back...
Harry and Meghan’s Netflix deal scuppers Invictus bash
● This article is the subject of a legal complaint from the Duke of SussexFor the wounded servicemen and women whom the Duke of Sussex calls “my heroes”, it waswww.thetimes.co.uk
I agree. I also think although Meghan is a complete wrongun the wrong steps she took early in the royal family weren’t totally her fault..people say ‘she should have learnt, she should have respected the traditions’ but there is one person who was responsible for showing her the ropes...Harry, her husband, who has lived in the royal family his whole damn life. In a way (playing devils advocate for a minute) I think she shit out marrying someone who’s still so wrapped up in his own trauma (and so hellbent on making the queen give him the rope to hang himself with so he could turn around and blame his family for his life), he didn’t really give her the help and advice she needed. Just my opinion, just my two cents, obviously this doesn’t apply to ALL their shitty behaviour, not defending them but I see it, Harry being so wrapped up in his own selfishness he is a self fulfilling prophecy.I've always liked Harry in the past but now I'm starting to think maybe Meg didn't brainwash him entirely...she just brought out the parts of him that were well hidden before by PR + influence of the RF. It's very hard for me to imagine that she could convince someone to do everything he's doing now (I don't care how skilled and convincing she thinks she is in the bedroom) if he didn't fundamentally agree with it somehow. Meg might be horrid but I wonder if Harry isn't all that different deep down. Maybe he's always resented being the spare and wanted more recognition and money than Wills, and Megs was sort of his ticket out/excuse to put that plan into action.
The BIB confirms what many of us here have been sayingAccording to the person who told me it is already out in that circle but for general public, highly unlikely.
I do believe that when the rumour mill was most active, his PRs were the ones leaking negative stories about MM to the press as a distraction.
From what I know of them, Royal PRs would give tabloid hacks a run for their money on dirty tricks and hatchet jobs when it comes to protecting those at the top.
Unfortunately for MM and H, they played right into their hands.
Harry and Meghan’s Netflix deal scuppers Invictus bashI hate the times paywall
The same Simon Case who was, until a few weeks ago, Prince William’s Private Secretary. I think I may love him.Comment from the Daily Mail about the repayment:
'Harry was obliged to, as this topic was raised by Simon Case as UK's new top civil servant.'
So it sounds as if questions were being asked and their hand was forced.
As far as im concerned repaying now will still not buy this self-centred pair either credibility, or respect !
God, is that place still on the go? I went on there once over a decade ago just to ask one question (after I'd got my head round all the DH,DC, DS, DD bollocks) wish I hadn't bothered. I've just opened a brand new salt grinder & chucked the whole thing over my shoulder for owt that's put on thereSlightly off topic
On the secret celebs thread someone posted a link to a thread onvipers nestmumsnet where a former showbiz PR was taking questions. Claims she has been told the William rumours are true and the Harkles have been stitched a kipper. (Second hand info so pinch of salt time).
The BIB confirms what many of us here have been saying
On topic: he’s a traitorous cunt and she‘s a grifting whore...............and a cunt!
No they don't own it, it's leased from the Crown Estate - they are tenants, not owners.Sorry if this question sounds really stupid but did the Queen actually gift Frogmore to them? Do they actually own it?
(I know that they can't sell it on but if they've invested 2.5 million pounds in it - do they get to rent it out to staff or something....can they recoup any of their renovation costs?)
ETA - I see up thread that they are still keeping it as their UK home (Harry's divorce retreat?)
The Queen refused to bail out Andrew, her son, over his ski chalet financial problems so doubt she would bail out her errant grandson.I think this or the Queen even.
Until I see the check from their bank account I'll never believe it. It's come too fast on the back of the Invictus debacle and smacks once again of damage control.
This was low down in the Mail, if you're not a scroller you would have missed it.The Queen refused to bail out Andrew, her son, over his ski chalet financial problems so doubt she would bail out her errant grandson.
LOL Simon Case, previous job was William’s right hand man. That is William protecting the monarchy front and centre!!!Comment from the Daily Mail about the repayment:
'Harry was obliged to, as this topic was raised by Simon Case as UK's new top civil servant.'
So it sounds as if questions were being asked and their hand was forced.
As far as im concerned repaying now will still not buy this self-centred pair either credibility, or respect !
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?