I think this or the Queen even.Daddy probably
The biggest scandal of the Invictus concert (which I think was a Diana-branded anniversary event) was that Invictus outed Harry as having planned a June 2021 Hollywood Bowl star-studded pop concert..... back in 2019. When he was a new dad, working Royal and happily going on fully-funded Royal tours., Oops.I think this or the Queen even.
Until I see the check from their bank account I'll never believe it. It's come too fast on the back of the Invictus debacle and smacks once again of damage control.
Exactly, the money may have come from Charles or out of the Netflix advance but wherever its appeared from Harry sure as hell didn't do any grafting for it. This has definitely been done for damage limitation.I think this or the Queen even.
Until I see the check from their bank account I'll never believe it. It's come too fast on the back of the Invictus debacle and smacks once again of damage control.
I don’t understand your point. Harry was involved in Invictus as a Senior Royal long before Meghan came onto the scene. Why would there be a problem with his involvement in a fundraising initiative for them?The biggest scandal of the Invictus concert (which I think was a Diana-branded anniversary event) was that Invictus outed Harry as having planned a June 2021 Hollywood Bowl star-studded pop concert..... back in 2019. When he was a new dad, working Royal and happily going on fully-funded Royal tours., Oops.
But that's a big part of the problem - they do think that we're moronsHarry's lawyer straight up said it was due to a conflict of interest (Amazon vs. Netflix) so why are they trying to spin it now? They must think we're all morons.
Unfortunately the majority of the public will take this on face value and think it's wonderful news along with the mad sugar nut cult that will see this as further proof of Smeggy's sainthood.But that's a big part of the problem - they do think that we're morons
This aged wellThey still need daddies cash, Netflix won't be stumping up front for months yet, maybe a year before the camera's start rolling.
It requires a bit of reading between the lines.I don’t understand your point. Harry was involved in Invictus as a Senior Royal long before Meghan came onto the scene. Why would there be a problem with his involvement in a fundraising initiative for them?
I thought exactly the same...needed something big to counteract the Invictus mess...not enough really, a drop in the ocean...
Harry hasn't paid 2.4 million but an unspecified amount that conveniently clears the debt. They are desperate to stop people talking about Invictus.
I don't believe a single word coming from a Harkles spokesperson.
It says a "contribution " has been made to sovereign grant by H&M, not full repayment for the renovations.So it would seem!
Meghan and Harry PAY BACK £2.4m for Frogmore refurb after £112m Netflix deal
PRINCE Harry and Meghan Markle have paid taxpayers back £2.4million for renovations on Frogmore Cottage. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were urged by MPs to refund the money spent on their Windsor …www.thesun.co.uk
Will believe it when the dust has settled and it's been confirmed that no new shenanighans has gone on
The Sussex Bots have now been organised and sent out to scream 'shame on evil granny for demanding her gift back and WhataboutP3d0Andrew'I thought exactly the same...needed something big to counteract the Invictus mess...not enough really, a drop in the ocean...
I'm not convinced that Harry has the power to tell Netflix what to do. He could denounce the tacky Diana musical but why should they take any notice of him? After all he needs their money so he's not the one calling the shots here.Latest from Celt News:-
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?