Yes they do. They attended Queen Elizabeth's coronation.....
Interesting, it seems like no reigning monarchs attended. They sent representatives:
But there was a Queen and these guys from British protectorates
Thank you for your two posts explaining, and I understand that you're voicing your opinion. It's all very complex isn't it and it's hard to see the wood for the trees. Please keep posting!
The expansion of the CoS list to include Catherine etc. was a fudge by KC to widen the pool to avoid Andrew and the Stoat being called upon. However they are still Counsellors of State and the Stoat is still domiciled in the UK - providing he's getting a renewed lease on Frogmore in March. KC did not want to upset the Stoat. PA and Stoat still hold the privileges, protection and duties of CoS as they have not been stripped of these titles. Please correct me if this is wrong.
As I understand it the Regency is decided by the LoS, not who is a CoS or most suitable, and Catherine was made a CoS for cosmetic purposes PR only. KC was praised for this move but it was an empty gesture, and I suspect that against all odds it was aimed at PA rather than the Stoat but I could be wrong.
It would be the Stoat as Regent if Charles and William were out of the picture. The Ho would be at his side and no way would they relinquish the position of protocol allowing Stoat to be Regent for George until he is 18. If this is the situation that would unfold, there would be a constitutional crisis with a crazy drug-addict as Regent with a toxic Call-girl at his side. All because of RF inaction and cowardice.
Tin hat on here triple foil but under cover of the increased security risk deliberately engineered by the Stoat, could they be planning something?
The RF seem to be sleepwalking, and have been since 2016 with these two. That's a long time, and I really wonder what they are playing at. They've been warned and warned but are still fussing over minutiae and polishing their public images.
That's interesting/ironic about the changes being suggested. Megsy thought that she coudl somehow be promoted or voted into the throne, ahead/instead of Will and Kate or even possibly chuck and Cams. She thought that by presenting herself as "whipsmart" 5am emails + hit the ground running hard working, "I don't need advisors" a natural... that Brenda would say " say.... you're pretty fab, compared to everyone else. fuck it, I'm going to promote you to next in line. Now go talk to HR about housing".
If only that harpy had just STOPPED and LOOKED and LISTENED, she could have possibly, gently, ever-so-maybe wont the respect and trust and admiration of the RF et al.... and maybe moved that aircraft carrier 10 degrees in her favour. As it stands - she won't be able to get a job much less a visa into the UK or any Commonwealth country.
Skank
Its possibly another confusion.
Philip was Counsellor as Spouse of a reigning Monarch.
Camilla became Counsellor as Spouse of a reigning Monarch. (Charles)
Kate will become Counsellor as Spouse of a reigning Monarch.(William)
So the person is wanting a modification, in favor of something that will anyway constitutionaly happen.
Maybe it will, or its just another proposal which came without neccesary background research, that gets rejected in Parliament.
Its also a thing of Royal Prerogrative, so the Kate as Regent is more important than Kate as Counsellor before William is King.
If something happens to him her having Regent is more important, the counsellor can be spun.
There are 5 robes, lots of ceremony, and it was always varied ,when/how/if crowned heads attend a coronation, so its all in Charles hands.
I found the clip. It just shows that we aren't the only ones thinking about this. Nothing else, really.