Hello @Evangelina ... so is PA doomed, FUBAR? If so by whom, and what for? Is he just under-wheels fodder? Who benefits from his doom?The difference with the Acts is that Margo was the Queen Regnant's sister vs Kate being Kings DiL.
So Charles and his ''optics'' and popularity chase of removing son in favour of DiL... well, he got away with more, but doubt it, because well..it's known.
Harry wouldn't agree to it, well I'm harping on here since I joined that the Sussex titles should be removed (was told they would be Prince/Princess-so what?) without the Sussex title, Harry would be a commoner (yes serious) which completely removes the protections of peerage laws over him.
He would have been treated like those from the Titles Removal Act 1917. And that wouldn't manipulate a Regency Act.
But, we are stuck, until the next Palace ''spin'' soothes our battered souls.
See it this way, there are 536 fake versions of the Billionaires Playboy club(Giuffre), all looking terribly authentic to the average person ,floating around.
The ''accuser''(other) which claimed to poses videos of famous people, was involved with Dougan (a potential foreign plant)
She ''fataly discredited'' herself with her own mails, in court. She also has a book out.(the people demand it)
The original Billionaires Playboy club(Giuffre) was handwriten, and leaked by Radar Online, Radar Online was Jeffreys property.
Some very high profile individuals became covertly owners of assets, they never had a clue(objective) that they recieved these assets from Epstein, simplified if Epstein was alive, they still wouldn't have a clue. How?
Dersh has Boies on tape doubting Giuffre's claims against Dersh.
Its billions, similar to SLAPP justice (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation) a, game of ''implicating'' friends, family to force the person into admitting or giving up.
Whatever it is, it's bigger than random pedophile fantasies, and anti-Jewish theories.
But there is zero demand to find out what actually happened, a shattered world view, or the neccesity to acknowledge ones own confirmation bias is way to hard. So he's doomed, see also the media-the ultimate ''protectors''of justice.
A mere mortal is FUBAR even faster.
What is Fubar please?Hello @Evangelina ... so is PA doomed, FUBAR? If so by whom, and what for? Is he just under-wheels fodder? Who benefits from his doom?
The Middletons will be invited to the coronation, right? Well, KC should tell them if they accept his invitation, he will also invite the Markles. Reconciliation on all sides… is in the air, folks.
If US media wants to concentrate on H&M, let’s see how THEIR narrative of “kindness” plays out with her unforgiven family there as well. Sit them together.
If it’s going to be a reality show, let’s go all in. Then it’s not just about how H&M are treated, it’s also about how they treat HER family.
Now that's a cracking idea. Father and son Tom and Tom, as well as Samantha, plus their other halves and kiddies (madam's cousins). Wonder how that would go down.
And the LAST thing anyone who has created a security risk against themselves ( and their children) is to confirm where you will be on a certain day…So bored of the "will they won't they" bs. If KC was smart, he would read the room and literally say : "In order to avoid any continued speculation, Harry and his wife, although much loved, are not jnvited to my coronation or indeed to the UK for any reason going forward. The comment he made have put my family and all members of our armed forces, active, inactive and retired, at an unnecessarily increased risk, and his position regarding us as a family, as a nation and as an institution makes it absolutely clear that he is ashamed, wants no part of it and has left and spoken many times to cut any association with it. We have asked them both to relinquish their titles, in keeping with their views and beliefs, but they have not and it is not my personal intention to force them. However if they choose to live with that contradiction, that is their choice. I have, however, decided to not give their children titles, also in keeping with their stated preference, as stated [date, time, platfor/video] and further in keeping with their opinions regarding the monarchy and Great Britain. The children have also been stripped of their British citizenship and Meghan of her visa. Regardless, I wish them only the best and now we can focus on the matter being closed. Thank you"
Whew.... that gooeven for 3 mi d to dream,
See also SNAFU
If this is so why are they themselves playing one one off against the other? Bad William vs. Compassionate Chuck? Good cop bad cop. This doesn't demonstrate strength but division and I don't know what the point of it is. Like the Susan Hussey fiasco where William was the fall guy.... "William can take a hit" Why should he be taking hits? He's got a job to do and isn't a bonds trader taking hits. He and his family should be protected rather than used to burnish Chuck's image.The spins are;
William affraid of overshadowing (press)
DM posts about Davos prostitutes to prevent William going (press is showing ''muscles'')
Eugenie goes (gets flack, but is a woman) -(press +Palace spin.(grifting Yorks)
Andrew out of BP, bathtub, 100million lawsuit (Charles) at the same moment the Coronation thing resurfaces as joint:
Charles wants them back, but, but evil William. (William has more popularity, so can take a hit from Squad (evil William)(fear of overshadowing), but is used as the one that appeals to Squad oposition, British values... (''William would never allow that, William the logical...'')
It's like the balcony game.
They are not on the balcony-a kibble , a illusion for Harkles opposition (they are punished, irrelevant)
They are at the Coronation (appeals to those with the ''we go high view,'' emotions of parents, and all audiences which are about US media relevance, Empire, accountability...
Fixed.
BIB your post"Cinnamon.girl:
Yes, suddenly miraculously the photo has a date stamp, but which photo was it? It could have been a photo of a Yorkie on the other side. Probably was. The FIB previously inspected the "copy" years ago but being whip-smart they missed the date stamp on the back. As you do."
a royal source has confirmed that it is a pair of humping yorkies with at least 3 voyeurystic corgis in the background....
(so, in the US there is a national "Speak Like a Pirate Day," so why not a national "Blog Like A Nuttynana Day".... since Feb 14th is already taken, what about 2/13/23?)....
I hope it is just Markle spin but it’s just getting to the stage now that I really don’t knowCould the entire "will they won't they" newsfeed be markle magic? I know BarkJack is relia le and has confirmed that they were invited and will attend, but the constant pingpong in the press, the only person who leaks is Markle and I am convinced she gets paid by the leak
The ''doomed'' comment is my own bias, because I can't see the potential of getting justice without the involvement of the media.Hello @Evangelina ... so is PA doomed, FUBAR? If so by whom, and what for? Is he just under-wheels fodder? Who benefits from his doom?
Good question - and what ever happened to that poor young fact checker that they hired? If she was let go, I missed it (not that she ever really did anything anyway)Have they any staff remaining or have they all left?
I've said this before but a boyfriend worked at Hatfield on the Queen's Flight of 146 aircraft in the 80s. He and his colleagues had a jam jar with an unflushable in it that they had retrieved from the royal loo!@KatLit
I like to think his Maj would be amused too.....
Thanks to KatLit for the comment that Harry is like an unflushable turd
View attachment 1919412
I remember reading this as well and that people were commenting that Heads of State usually do not attend other Head of State Coronation and that Albert might be breaking with tradition.I'm sure I read that Prince Albert of Monaco has said he will be attending
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?