Incoming Ambassadors have to be accredited to the Court of St James, since ambassadors are technically the liaison between heads of state, and not between governments ( though their actions are as representatives of their government.) The Monarch receives those credentials in person - would be an interesting point as to whether there is a precedent or mechanism for a monarch to refuse them, because in the unlikely scenario suggested one can hardly see KC doing it.I don't think she'll try to be a politician. I think she wants them to give her an Ambassador position. Preferably in London where people will have to invite her because she's the American Ambassador.
".....leaking his plans to make 'Africa' their 'Base'."Just saw this ... about how in Ep.5 of the Netflix shit Hazno blamed someone in the Royal Household for leaking his plans to make 'Africa' their 'Base'. What a load of shit, what a whiney little bitch. As if Megnut wanted to ever live in Africa and fullfill his 'white saviour' fantasies. Bloke is beyond fucking deluded. Utter shithouse of a man. She probably leaked the info to the media anyway. Fucking twat.
https://www.geo.tv/latest/461782-on...new-about-meghan-and-harrys-south-africa-plan
I don't actually know much about this fellow, but I'd say he's got more problems on his plate than being pwned by Greta. ('Small dick energy' was a GREAT put down).
Blackness is not about color in the USA. It’s a mix of family lineage and social construct and power relationships. But I’m happy to explain what I meant earlier. Meghan has always known she’s half black but because of where she grew up and being white passing, she wasn’t experiencing the world as a black American woman. It was about family. She wasn’t treated by the world as a black woman. Then when she got with Harry and suddenly being half black became a well known thing. And how she was treated by the world changed. People began speaking about her in charged language and targeted by microagressions all too familiar to black women. In other words, her relationship to blackness, became intimate on a valence wholly different from just family history. Maybe it’s all about skin tone in the UK but that’s absolutely not the experience in the USA.
For the benefit of my understanding.I think differently. I’m not from the UK and can’t pretend to know how things work there but I am a black American woman and can only speak about my experience as a black woman who grew up in predominantly white spaces. I’m not light skinned but my sister was. As are many members of my immediate family. While I’m not biracial, I can relate to Meghan’s experience of knowing you are black and then having experiences where knowing becomes knowing in a broader context.
Here you go:Cheering article in The Times - over to you geniuses to unlock from behind the paywall:
Public support for stripping Harry of royal title after Netflix film
Almost half of the British public think the Duke of Sussex should be stripped of his royal title following the release of his Netflix documentary, polling has fwww.thetimes.co.uk
That bubble of his is getting smaller and smaller, and he’s sharing that dwindling space with some of the earths most deranged and unhinged people. It’s the equivalent of putting your head under the duvet to smell your own farts.Oh...
I'm serving them up in the VIP room nowFerrero Rocher all round
"only close in comparison to the Panorama interview with Princess Diana"And there is another documentary coming out after Unforgiven... apparently includes input from Trevity Trev trev
View attachment 1840689
Oh Ham(ster)bassador, you're spoiling us.
My daughter wouldn't dream of showing pics of her undressed children on Facebook, in case those pics get 'out there' to sickos.The picture shows his whole face and bare torso. Showing your child in a bathtub, unclothed whether recent or not is so irresponsible. There is no reason or excuse for parents to do this especially famous parents and especially on a streaming platform.
There are websites where predators actually store pictures of children like that for their own use. It's disgusting.
I hate to insinuate this but given Elton John and Oprah's track records - That picture really made me sad for Archie and Lilibet. That they were willing to sell that to Netflix is very unsettling.
I agree, they shouldn’t be allowed to attend. They’ve burned their bridges, enjoy life overseas etc. Of course with normal family feuds (including celebs) they don’t actually speak to or see their estranged family members. But these brassnecked fuckers will slate the RF on docuseries, podcasts, magazines, in books, via balloon-faced mouthpieces and vicious Sussex Squad loons and STILL TURN UP TO ROYAL EVENTS EXPECTING FIRST ROW STATUS. And an apology to boot! It’d be laughable if the whole situation wasn’t threatening our constitution and public standing around the world.Thanks Lady Muck.
BookWorm doesn't think things will get much better yet for the Royals, sorry. We'll suffer Live to Lead and B/W refuses to look at it with Greta in it.
Another docuseries "Unforgiven" due in January, Spare due out on 10th January and MM is working on her own autobiography as we speak. An overdose of the Stoats.
The Stoat will be in the UK early January apparently to promote his Memoir, and wants to see C to explain his point of view.
The Stoats seem to be doing their own thing separately and will keep up the pretence until after the Coronation.
B/W reports gossip that even if they're not formally invited to the Coronation they will travel to the UK in a bid to force C to invite them. BP has contingency plans to let them attend a couple of events, no big public appearances, keep them out of sight so they don't steal the focus.
A rumour, but B/W believes a distinct possibility, that "the Memoir is much worse than we think it is". This possibility was then echoed in a DM article which she read, word for word.
B/W wondered if this was a marketing ploy to drum up interest.
But what if it isn't, and there's something really embarrassing? BP will have no control over the distribution or fallout, and will have no time to react with damage control. C's reputation could suffer immense damage.
The below info BookWorm stressed is a rumour, but she believes it is credible.
She has a source who informed her that the Memoir contains information so harmful that C will have no choice but abdicate by the end of March. He will not make his Coronation.
B/W is trying to put all the puzzle pieces together, wishes everyone a happy New Year, and sends her love.
............
The RF contingency plan as outlined by B/W seems dodgy. Keep them out of sight and just let them attend a couple of minor events so they don't steal the show? That didn't work last time either. If theyre not formally invited they shouldn't be allowed to gatecrash like Ngozi did, and they should be banned. One or the other, no half-in-half-out.
It’s hard to imagine anyone less suited for an ambassadorial position… I think we’re safeOmg that would piss me off sooooooooo much. Could the PM veto the choice? A nice little "sorry.. she isn't welcoome here anymore" would be delish..
Well yes book release is 9th so id expected to see it wrapped by nowAccording to this article the interview with Tom is being recorded at the moment and will be broadcast on ITV early next month, although again it is strange that there has been little mention of this interview since it was announced, because I am currently looking at The What's On TV Guide for the week of the 7-13 January and the interview isn't listed for ITV so now I am actually wondering if the interview with Tom is even happening.
https://www.tatler.com/article/prince-harry-interviewed-tom-bradby
Outa my way!!!!!
My daughter wouldn't dream of showing pics of her undressed children on Facebook, in case those pics get 'out there' to sickos.
What people will do for dollars ehe? For shame on them.
we come out fighting.They've all forgotten that whilst we stand nicely in queues and are very polite, if you back us into a corner, we come out fighting.
I just saw an interview with Michelle Obama talking about why she never had braids or more natural styles in the White House. She said the topic of her hair and dress was already a distraction from what she was to accomplish regarding kids nutrition. It was a huge scandal when Barack date wear a tan suit. She wanted to pick her battles. She she straightened her hair, wore weaves and wigs. I get it. Little girls today are sent home from school for having natural hair and hair styles. Recently congress tried to pass the CROWN act, a law to people from being discriminated against based on hair texture and styles associated with ethnic/racial background (because it happens) but it failed to pass in the Senate.It's not dirty, it is over processed, over straightened, and the hair extentions can cause hair strands to bunch and separate. I really really fail to understand why she never wears her hair au naturale.
View attachment 1840646View attachment 1840670View attachment 1840672
Hairstyles in photos 1&3 are fun and flattering, hairstyle 2 looks damaged, little patches of scalp are exposed and its just not pretty.
P.S. I grew up with stick straight hair, endured years of my mom dragging me to someone's house for a home perm and slept on curlers. Then came the days of electric rollars wherein I burned my fingers and occasionally an ear. I was so glad to escape my mom's hair styling!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?