Dried unicorn tit?Just fell briefly into that twatter sugars rabbit hole. What the duck are those people smoking?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Ironic that she is so focussed on having a positive image - sheās created the opposite. It isnāt just the politically right that dislike her in the UK now... I have spoken to very left leaning friends and family who cannot stand her. She talks about doing good but when someone who is so focussed on their image does so many hypocritical things... their efforts of āgood doingā are severely overshadowed and people donāt trust her at all! I genuinely think she has a very poor image in the UK. And most people just arenāt interested enough to express their views online and i donāt think its about her modernising the royal family - people can take modernisation and do embrace it... if done with patience, integrity and transparency. She has been like a bull in a china shop and people can spot the insincerity a mile off.
It will be interesting if Smeg goes any darker in complexion given the events that are occurring at the moment cos up to now she has tried to cover up any features that wouldn't make her suitable for blending in.she has done her best to conceal any part of her that wouldnt "fit in"and seems to pick her image depending on how it would suit her circumstances at the time.
its getting now as though I'm scared to write anything incase I offend anyone and their dog
this is what it's come to and it's worrying I feel I have to apologize for where I was born and the colour of my parents.
and to cap it all...everything's gone bold
Fixed it ..yayyyyy.apologies everyone....
Can't be left alone with anything...trusted with nothing...as my mam used to say
The positive is I can emphasize my writing,...god help you all now
They are still what Freda says
its getting now as though I'm scared to write anything incase I offend anyone and their dog
this is what it's come to and it's worrying I feel I have to apologize for where I was born and the colour of my parents.
and to cap it all...everything's gone bold
Fixed it ..yayyyyy.apologies everyone....
Can't be left alone with anything...trusted with nothing...as my mam used to say
The positive is I can emphasize my writing,...god help you all now
They are still what Freda says
Last edited:
Absolutely!!
Grrrrr... It was MLP who dragged Smeg into it when she tried to apologise and referred to her close friendship with her and all the racism she has had to deal with, not other people just making this tit up to be vindictive!!
Absolutely!! Smeg then continues to insert herself into the story. That bunch are just forever shifting blame. Not a single ounce of accountability anywhere... Of course, it's the plebs who are too stupid to see what's true.
Last edited:
[/QUOTE]
1. Harry knows his place, why would he start "performing" when he doesn't want or have to?
2. Why weren't they told to bugger off inside, rather than go to the steps, have the initial fanfare and then mingle amongst the gathering?
3. Why were they allowed into Bucks Palace when they resided at Kensington at the time?
What I don't understand is that if they did gatecrash, then:I seem to remember there being some talk of them just turning up & gatecrashing PCs birthday garden party. That they werenāt meant to be there, they gatecrashed an investiture last time they were here, so it wouldnāt be above them
The overshadowing can see that given her incessant need to make everything about her. LCCās talks about her being bored & wanting to leave, if thatās so then surely it must have been said loudly enough for people to hear, and IMHO that alone would have mortified C&C & anyone else who heard it, because itās just not done.
They definitely werenāt expecting to be asked to leave though
1. Harry knows his place, why would he start "performing" when he doesn't want or have to?
2. Why weren't they told to bugger off inside, rather than go to the steps, have the initial fanfare and then mingle amongst the gathering?
3. Why were they allowed into Bucks Palace when they resided at Kensington at the time?
Yankee is enjoying the fallout with Meghan and Jessica
Agree!! Stupid, but not racist in any way, Sasha knew she can use it to her advantage at the moment...my eyes have been rolling sooo hard over the last few days, with all those celebrities falling over each other in the race to keep themselves "relevant and employable", as somebody put it - must be exhausting. (And just to make it clear - skin colour shouldn't make any difference in how we treat a person, nor should we be forced to shut up because of it - but the current disruption, vandalism, witch-hunt and grovelling is not the right way to get there).
Last edited:
I read that William was to have made the speech but for some reason couldnāt so Harry was pulled in to do it.
( Which would figure as he was obviously not prepared so might have even been the very speech that William would have done)
I presume they were then expected to leave for Charles to be star of the show but Meghan decided to mingle.
I really dont know and this is pure speculation but I think I read somewhere Prince Charles invited Meghan to accompany him to an important event. She agreed. Not only did she not attend but she did not call ahead to Prince Charles to say she was not going. It would not be surprising that she just turned up at his birthday party to make it all about her, and PC was offended at her lack of manners and sent her packing.
1. No, he does not. If he did, not only would he not allow his wife to step in front of him, but he would not participate in her shennanigans on top of it.
2. No, they weren't. I already posted the photo of them looking royally pissed in their car.
3. They were in BP because they had business there. Remember, they didn't have their own team anymore and they were not allowed to use the Cambrigdes. Thus BP. Also I can't quite follow why you think they aren't allowed into the BP.
Watch from 1:57m. He is enableing her. They both obviously disobey a direct order from PoW, she tries to get ahead of Kate and it takes TWO courtiers to throw them out of the room.
ETA correct time
Note the first comment. Looks like Yankee Wally is in our midst. ;-)
Last edited:
@Poppea Yes you are right about Harry enabling Meghan's behaviour. It's something I've found very puzzling. Of course he wants to support his wife but it would be more helpful if he guided her. It's telling that he obviously doesn't care
Perhaps he was tired of having to trail around after the old folks.
Perhaps he was tired of having to trail around after the old folks.
It was a disagreement, between 2 influencers; but Jessica wields more power than Sasha due to her white privilege. Jessica publicly apologised; but privately said she was going to sue Sasha.
With the background of BLM protests; Sasha had the confidence to call out Jessica on her two facedness.
āBout time for Megz to start rocking a āFro or dreads.
Let's see if we hear anything from Torontopaper, though they haven't posted anything since the 6th of may.
Iāve seen this clip quite a few times.
Itās obvious that the Harkles are being held back; the Queens black equerry arrives almost at a run to stop Harry.
However Iām not really sure why they arenāt allowed to look at the stuff on the table....
Harry does enable her, but he still knows the rules of order.
Re 2 - that wasn't the point I made.
As for BP - wherever their offices were, they've been very vocal throughout they prefer being at Windsor. It makes no sense they were allowed to gate crash as is claimed, given the numerous staff and the royals themselves have the opportunity to tell them to bugger off too.
I'm not interested in changing anyone's viewpoints, but trying to understand why those views are held. It's not one I agree with based on what's been said about this topic by anyone.
That makes more sense, tha gatecrashing. So just the mingle part was out of their remit.
Yep I've seen the clip several times too. I think the stuff on the table is specifically related to the role of Prince of Wales, a role Harry will never have, hence why it's just Queeny, Charles, Wills and their partners.
Last edited:
Thread Title
Meghan and Harry: We're Ex-Royalty with no Loyalty
On Lady C's most recent YouTube, she talks at length about the targeting of her young friend Prince Leo and his family (by Megz's team although she phrases it carefully). She goes on to say that she chose not to focus on Doria in the book so doesn't see why Prince Leo and his family should be subject to attacks....
Make of that what you want!
Meghan and Harry: We're Ex-Royalty with no Loyalty
Lady C was careful not to go there re Doria's background or personal life in her book - but does say that she was away for 'long stretches of time'......
On Lady C's most recent YouTube, she talks at length about the targeting of her young friend Prince Leo and his family (by Megz's team although she phrases it carefully). She goes on to say that she chose not to focus on Doria in the book so doesn't see why Prince Leo and his family should be subject to attacks....
Make of that what you want!
She said in another video she won't say if it is or isn't true that D. was in jail, as it would not be her place to talk about it. And then she says in polite society if someone has served their time one would not talk about it furthermore.
She actually makes it very clear that D. did time. She just doesn't say or write it. And how could she, if the records were expunched. She can only say or put in writing things she has proof of. She won't be able to proof it, so she does a very fine dance telling by not telling.
And she says her book is about M+H, not anyone else, so she won't discuss D.
Last edited:
Yep, haven't questioned that and concurred it happened...! The garden party is what I questioned, which was on a different day about 10 months prior.
Ok. I just do not understand your question then
- Status