No, same thing!
No, same thing!Does ice cream sandwich mean something different in the US?
I agree. These newer photos are far clearer, obviously the earlier ones weren’t getting them enough attention so they told whoever to ‘leak’ a few more.have to say that last photo of the little boy does, to me, look like a young Haz and he looks a bit older than the first few (maybe it was camera angles, IDK anymoreI think the Wyoming Fark is the Christmas card Fark.
I shudder to think what else she keeps in her bag. Lost souls, vegan gluten free tasteless treats, a leash for Harry, Kate’s tears, a tiara …Great minds think alike!
Being seen sitting on a pavement amongst the hoi-polloi won't do his court case demanding top level security any favours.I agree. These newer photos are far clearer, obviously the earlier ones weren’t getting them enough attention so they told whoever to ‘leak’ a few more.have to say that last photo of the little boy does, to me, look like a young Haz and he looks a bit older than the first few (maybe it was camera angles, IDK anymore)
I have no doubt it is Harry. And Archie is very cuteI see the Daily Mail have posted more pictures from the 4th of July Parade in Wyoming that we haven't previously seen and I have to say that I am still not convinced that this is Harry and Meghan in this picture. The beard looks too long to be Harry's and doesn't look like it has been shaved in quite a while, the women in the picture looks to have brown hair and the man seems to have very hairy arms. I have compared the arms to when he appeared in the acting segment for Travalyst and they don't look the same. So maybe it is them, but I still have my doubts as it seems strange that there are no clear pictures of Meghan. I have just seen that somebody has pointed out that the ear looks different and it is funny how in the previous photos we have seen the man had a black ring on yet in this photo the ring is gold.
View attachment 1402076View attachment 1402158 View attachment 1402098
All because of a petulant manchild’s latest tantrumPossible , aides are disposable (even when Royals create/order the problem/the things which happened , see Ashe Windham)
If he is lucky, he will move to another Household in a less prominent position .
Archie is cute but what I don't understand is why didn't they take Lilibet with them and I also find it strange how there are no clear photos of Meghan from the event as you don't see her face in any of the photos that have been released to the media because we all know that Meghan loves to be photographed, yet in these photos she has gone camera shy all of a sudden.I have no doubt it is Harry. And Archie is very cute
Archie is cute but what I don't understand is why didn't they take Lilibet with them.
i know this is a late reply, I’m catching up…He just wants to keep wasting tax payer money. I hope he gets landed with all the costs. It's disgusting.
Now he's pretending that he told someone at the palace and they didn't inform the court? It's not their job to inform the court. Plus I'm quite sure that if he did say something the reply was 'You cannot buy the police' I'd have added you fucking moron but I doubt they did that.
My first post is a link to today's judgment - I hope that is allowed
How many times is it nowTrevorCoult! Say it ain't so. Smeg wants ro renew their vows? They have lost the plot.
It's glorious when they write a book while leaving completely disillusioned , see Patrick Jephson, or Ken Wharfe(parts of it).Or to the Government. Like Simon Case, Samantha Cohen, Lord Geidt, etc.
Some of those ex-RF staff are probably a treasure trove of useful information......
I think he’s gaslighting everyone. The whole ‘I am going to spend six months a year in the UK’ then no security means ‘the UK government has made it unsafe and untenable for me to follow my plan of six months at home, it’s literally too dangerous but it’s not my fault, I’ve tried everything possible but the government ruined it for me. But because I tried everything I still need to be Counsellor of State from the States.’This is really funny! Hope the link works - not very savvy with this kind of thing. Apologies if already posted and I missed it.
I don't know what to make of it but Pablo is in it!
Why Don't You Use The Toilet! This Disgusting Personal Habits Of Meghan Made MEXICAN GARDENER Retch. - YouTube
Sounds to me like he's trying to lay the groundwork for the half in/half out that he was denied. If he gets security while in the UK, and he does some "royal work" - not a lot but some - he will then make the case he needs it while in the U.S., hoping to get his IPP status which will then extend to Minge and the flatpacks. IMO this is all calculated to get him what he wants in the end which is the IPP status.
Unless you go to the urban dictionary...!No, same thing!
If he loses-he doesn't get to pay at all.(police is not for sale, or so they claim )It does matter if he wins....if he wins Its the British tax payer that will be paying for the case, if he loses its Harry that has to pay for it.
I think it has to be a moot point about what information is forwarded..... Surely Edward Youngs job is to represent the Queen and to report back or upwards a summary version of events.
How on earth can Hawwy prove what was or what wasnt forwarded? For all he knows Young could have verbally relayed the suggestion that Harry was willing to pay....and nobody recorded it, because its technically impossible!! The Met police are not up for sale to the highest bidder...
BIB. Totally agree!!BIB
And only there by our continued consent. I think a few of them forget that. It's not their decision whether we continue as a Monarchy. It's ours.
If a junior Cabinet Minister was behaving like Haz, the media would be 100% demanding that the PM sack him/her.
It's about time we had an official Code of Conduct for the Royals. A stringent one for the working ones, and a slightly more relaxed one, setting out expected behaviour/not bringing the RF into disrepute for the non-working ones.
Fall foul of it and you're out. Titled or not.
Flip if I worked in that environment (and didn’t get fired for giving ‘the look’ when someone annoys me) I’d have read receipts and back ups of back ups!! Jeez it really is a treacherous dog eat dog set up - all done very politely no doubt but wow!If he loses-he doesn't get to pay at all.(police is not for sale, or so they claim )
If Young was at the Sandringham Summit, then his role was a part of the ''way ahead meetings'' and then it's something a bit different .
If Harry sent an e-mail as claimed , nothing is verbal.
If Young relied anything anywhere verbally , then he should be fired.
If no corespondence exists between Palace-Ravec then nothing was forwarded .
Also, there's no ''verbal'' in their world, that would be deadly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?