I think that the Queen has not stripped them of their titles because she hopes Harry will return to the fold and it makes it easier to reinstate him within the family. However, if at the one year review this shows no sign of happening I think the titles will be withdrawn.I think that we should have a sweepstake on how much longer the marriage will last:
a) It's pretty much over now, Harry's off to rehab when she gets a new dog
b) Six months or however long it takes for California divorce laws to work in Megzilla's favour
c) A year until the royal family send special forces in the dead of night to force Harry on to a plane home
d) He's already locked in the basement and she will be wheeling out his robot doppelganger for the next few years with pre-written scripts
My money is on option b
Yes I follow him, he's brilliantDoes anyone follow Harry Markle on Facebook?
How sick, desperate and deluded are the Sussex PR and MM? Sophie Wessex helped out quietly with making meals for the NHS, and the LA based charity posted an announcement an hour ago (8.30 a.m.) to state that the Sussex duo did two days charity work EXCEPT they didn't say it was the Sussexes, and as they aren't in the US officially theoretically their titles shouldn't be used.
What do they want? Applause, cheers and to be fed adoration for a couple of days? Why did the charity feel the need to post? Surely they are a bit busy delivering meals rather than to make graphics? Did the charity get 'asked' to post that notice on social media? It looks like it.
Trying to compete with other members of the RF is futile, sad, dumb, and pathetic.
It appears Angel food are hoping people will donate, now cringe & ginge have had their mugs everywhere!
me tooI really hope that the DM win the case and take them for a fortune,then donate most of it to charity....then publish every bit of true dirt they have on them.
Also read somewhere that hs trust fund has decreased, probably due to Rona,shame really,couldn't happen to two nicer ppl.
A perfectly framed situation |
Photos of a masked-up Harry and Meghan walking out in LA hit the tabloids yesterday. It must be so annoying for the publicity-shy couple, who so famously left the UK to avoid exactly this sort of press intrusion. Who could have foreseen that moving to the only city in the world with a more ferocious paparazzi scene than London would have turned out to be a bit of a blunder? The photos in the Sun are credited to Jeff Rayner of LA-based photo agency Coleman-Rayner. You may remember Jeff as the man who previously set up the staged shots of Thomas Markle getting fitted for a wedding suit and searching for pictures of Harry at an internet café – the ones that kicked off the entire Markle family imbroglio in the first place. What a welcome to the neigbourhood! Still, if Harry and Meghan need are in need of a silver lining, just imagine how small Coleman-Rayner's carbon footprint is going to be now that they don't have to travel too far to source these pictures any more. |
I know what you mean , but the Mail is all about click bait, they have a court case coming up after that the gloves will be off , they know the comments are going to be negative and that’s what they want.The amount of PR shit on the Daily Fail this morning has pissed me off so much that I've fallen out with myself! I can't even go out for an angry walk because I'm not allowed, but she's saying that it felt good to be out and about connecting with people! I swear........ fuckung morons!
Unrecognisable.Is there a link to that? That's big!
No, he's still a skinny drip as far as I can see honey.Is it just me or does this Harry look a lot plumper than the stressed and thin looking Harry of late.? If anything you’d expect him to be even thinner as they continue their slow motion car crash across the globe. Or maybe he’s just thrivin’ ya know.
Honestly, the idiocy of this litigation is crazy mad and highlights how incredibly unaware these two idiots are.I know what you mean , but the Mail is all about click bait, they have a court case coming up after that the gloves will be off , they know the comments are going to be negative and that’s what they want.
She can’t sell them as she no longer has them. Wasn’t the deal she never paid for them - that’s why the tags were left on everything. Didn’t her sidekick get them free and then sell themShe burnt them long ago
Sorry I fell down a rabbit hole this morning myself and read it in comments on a you tube video. One person mentioned it and the other agreed mentioning her classmates.Is there a link to that? That's big!
Perhaps the dog is Archiedoll in a beagle suit disguise?
I remember reading somewhere that it was a class project but somehow Meghan claimed that it was just her. TypicalSorry I fell down a rabbit hole this morning myself and read it in comments on a you tube video. One person mentioned it and the other agreed mentioning her classmates.
Tried to copy it to paste it at the time but couldn’t. Will try to find it again if I can.
This info came from here about 6 pages backView attachment 111930
This blow up shows the trade mark Back Grid - Back Grid are a paparazzo company - that H and M have told where they will be so as to ‘leak’ the picture of them ‘doing good’ They are the worst grifters ever. This information came from @accordingtoTaz on YouTube.
As luck would have it I did find the link. Sorry only way I lead you to it that it’s in replies to the recentI remember reading somewhere that it was a class project but somehow Meghan claimed that it was just her. Typical
If she put that hideous green outfit on Ebay she'd be lucky to get 50p for itShe can’t sell them as she no longer has them. Wasn’t the deal she never paid for them - that’s why the tags were left on everything. Didn’t her sidekick get them free and then sell them
on privately?
If they were royal, I would suggest ''the staff'' But they arent royal any more are they?Who's looking after Archie-doll?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?