Harry and Meghan #161 Was the 16 bath Mansion ever their home? Are they together or living alone?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
But i just voted just before the hour. Off to have a look.
Just voted again, right now. All still there. Maybe you were on the groups section. I have wasted a vote doing that, just as i vote the page moves and i think, where is everyone.
Congratulations Chita on the thread title.
Thank you Fred Snail for starting the new thread and the great recap.
Thank you Fred Snail for starting the new thread and the great recap.
Oh I do apologise as it is showing our normal gifting page with Markle at the top. Not sure how I managed it as I checked several times to be sure and now I can't even find the group page. Never even been on the group page before I made the previous post. And I have voted so much I have it bookmarked. Really can't explain how I ended up on a different page, sorry for wrong info.
Wow..... my preggie tummy never swayed like that when I walked.
Last edited:
You're right - thank you.I don’t think there was charity money in 2020.
If you look at the paperwork pictured in the DM article, it lists the “Date asserts first received” as February 2, 2021, so logically before that date it had no assets. -> Archewell Foundation took in $0 in 2020.
View attachment 965326
Harry and Meghan Archewell charity raised less than $50,000 in 2020
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent more money on legal fees for their charities than they raised for their new non-profit Archewell in 2020, filings obtained by DailyMail.com reveal.www.dailymail.co.uk
Great to see the Mail bringing this $50k story to the wider audience.I don’t think there was charity money in 2020.
If you look at the paperwork pictured in the DM article, it lists the “Date asserts first received” as February 2, 2021, so logically before that date it had no assets. -> Archewell Foundation took in $0 in 2020.
View attachment 965326
Harry and Meghan Archewell charity raised less than $50,000 in 2020
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent more money on legal fees for their charities than they raised for their new non-profit Archewell in 2020, filings obtained by DailyMail.com reveal.
The comments are fantastic, so many people know about the 95% cream-off.
Obviously I get all my Markle News from Omid Scuntie
but strangely he seems to have forgotten to report on this story. Too busy reinventing himself as a court correspondant on Randy Andy,
Thans to @Fredsnail for new thread, congrats @Chita for brill title!
As seen on twitter...cover of national enquire
would love a read of that article
As seen on twitter...cover of national enquire
would love a read of that article
Harry 'shocked when Andrew barked at staff to get his mangoes' royal chef claims
A former Royal chef claimed that while Prince Harry and Prince William were brought up with impeccable manners when talking to staff, the young prince was shocked at how Prince Andrew allegedly spoke to them
A former royal chef wrote a book years ago and now its being quoted to promote Hawwy as the new version of the sainted Diana.
It's strange how 'sensitive Hawwy' didn't like the way his uncle spoke to staff but his wife could bully them as much as she wanted to
Is this to distract us from the bullying claims? and it's throw Uncle Andrew under the bus day anyway. I'm only surprised that Andrew isn't accused of being racist to them as well.
But of course it was UK tabloids that were so mean to them and which they had to run away from. To a place where there are no mean tabloids. oh wait a minute ...Thans to @Fredsnail for new thread, congrats @Chita for brill title!
As seen on twitter...cover of national enquire
View attachment 965737
Here you areThans to @Fredsnail for new thread, congrats @Chita for brill title!
As seen on twitter...cover of national enquire
View attachment 965737
From today's Guardian .........
The Mail on Sunday will pay the Duchess of Sussex just £1 in damages for invading her privacy by publishing a private letter she had sent to her father.
The nominal sum is set out in court documents that also formally confirm that the newspaper – and its sister website MailOnline – has accepted defeat and will not be taking the long-running case to a supreme court appeal.
The outlet will also pay an unspecified sum for the separate case of infringing Meghan’s copyright by publishing large chunks of the letter.
Mark Stephens, a media lawyer, suggested that the nominal settlement for the privacy aspect suggested a weakness in that aspect of Meghan’s case: “Normally for that kind of invasion of privacy you would expect £75,000 to £125,000. It does show that the curation of her reputation was an area where she had effectively invaded her own privacy.”
The newspaper’s publisher has also agreed to pay a confidential sum in damages for copyright infringement. The Mail on Sunday also faces having to cover a substantial part of Meghan’s legal costs, which could be more than £1m.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/02/how-meghan-took-personal-risks-mail-on-sunday-privacy-victory
The duchess had always said that her three-year legal battle against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Mail on Sunday and sister website MailOnline, was more about principles than money.
The Mail on Sunday will pay the Duchess of Sussex just £1 in damages for invading her privacy by publishing a private letter she had sent to her father.
The nominal sum is set out in court documents that also formally confirm that the newspaper – and its sister website MailOnline – has accepted defeat and will not be taking the long-running case to a supreme court appeal.
The outlet will also pay an unspecified sum for the separate case of infringing Meghan’s copyright by publishing large chunks of the letter.
Mark Stephens, a media lawyer, suggested that the nominal settlement for the privacy aspect suggested a weakness in that aspect of Meghan’s case: “Normally for that kind of invasion of privacy you would expect £75,000 to £125,000. It does show that the curation of her reputation was an area where she had effectively invaded her own privacy.”
The newspaper’s publisher has also agreed to pay a confidential sum in damages for copyright infringement. The Mail on Sunday also faces having to cover a substantial part of Meghan’s legal costs, which could be more than £1m.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/02/how-meghan-took-personal-risks-mail-on-sunday-privacy-victory
The duchess had always said that her three-year legal battle against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Mail on Sunday and sister website MailOnline, was more about principles than money.
Thank you @Little Fluffy Clouds !
Thank you for the new thread 
If she's donating her copyright sum to the Diana charity as stated in the Sunday Times then we will know what it is...won't we?
That says received from California. Does that mean it doesn't /didn't count anything they put in from elsewhere before that?I don’t think there was charity money in 2020.
If you look at the paperwork pictured in the DM article, it lists the “Date asserts first received” as February 2, 2021, so logically before that date it had no assets. -> Archewell Foundation took in $0 in 2020.
View attachment 965326
Harry and Meghan Archewell charity raised less than $50,000 in 2020
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent more money on legal fees for their charities than they raised for their new non-profit Archewell in 2020, filings obtained by DailyMail.com reveal.
As clear as mud.
You are welcome. I have a free readly trial for 2 months, so happy to help. I will aim to be a bit more proactive if see articles.
Thanks for your thanks. Have a good day all x
Thanks for the shiny new thread guys xx
Very short video by Keep NYC meghan trash free
Very short video by Keep NYC meghan trash free
I’m going out shortly, so I’ll update stuff this afternoon.
Alex Belfield
So no substantial damages as claimed by Scabies
excellent news 
It's annoying that they have to pay towards her shady fat cat lawyers though.
Alex urges Hawwy to take off his silly hat
obviously unaware that I've already stolen it
Last edited:
- Status