Of course they dothey haven’t made any other shit stick so give it a whirl.
A vengeful , clueless aristo and a power hungry grifter with fuck all knowledge or work ethic behind them.
who says you can’t look good with wrinkles and lines?
I think the Queen for example looks amazing for her years, I met her in person a couple of times. I live in a place where plastic surgery is rife and actually makes people (again in my opinion) often look older and less attractive. I would much rather age gracefully than try and hopelessly hanker after my youth. Just my opinion but I think reflecting her true age and image would’ve been more successful as a photo.
I agree that Catherine would want to look her best. I just don’t think these photos reflect her beauty, class or individuality.
But maybe posed photos aren’t her thing. I hate them.
I think everyone but the sugars mock him, he’s a total tool!When's Tom Bower's book due out?
I think he makes it clear with one word (tame) that Omid Scobie is not looked upon favourably by actual journalists.
I have a feeling the "proper" journalists mock him.
I remember Dan Wootton once described him as being ‘a strange little man’.I think everyone but the sugars mock him, he’s a total tool!
Exactly. It isn’t Catherine’s fault, they just made her look like a completely different person with whatever filters/touch ups/styling they have done. It is the photographer and production that has failed.I don't like 'em either.
Too much soft focus.
One of the sideways ones looks so retro that it could be of Mary Pickford or some other silent movie star of days gone by.
Not cool, just old fashioned.
That (now iconic) photo of her close up in the mask at Prince Philip's funeral was crisp and clear. It captured the beauty of her eyes and her dignity and decorum in one shot.
These just look blurry and whatever effect the photographer has used make the images look like someone else entirely.
Sadly, it makes them the most money.Is anyone else's sick to death of the Meghan vs Kate stuff in the media?
Why can't an article about Kate just be about her with no reference or comparison to the dog of Monteshitto?
I'm also sick of Diana being dragged up pointlessly in comparison or hearing people imagining that they know what she would think
It's all such pointless crap.
She's already written a book about it and done the talk shows etc.. this is to fund her $1.8 million house she just moved in to before xmasI think for her, the court case is important because it gives her a platform to launch a career that can include a book, interviews etc etc that will pay way more than a settlement, however generous. So I think she has no interest in settling. She wants to make a career out of this.
If I was her I think I’d want a lobotomy to try and forget PA ever got that close. But, you know, we’re all different, I guess
Money for the media owners. The ANL verdict wouldn't bother them much because the whole thing was a money-spinner. For all of them. Lots of articles, lots of clicks and lots of happy advertisers.Sadly, it makes them the most money.
So it aint gonna stop.
Mencap would be more apt!!I love what a Mensa-reject he looks in this
I bet the Doxy would love to pull Kate's lovely hair out by the roots instead of her usual own manky,horsetail textured balding barnet.RF pay tribute to Kate
Royal Family make Kate Middleton's birthday on Instagram https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...rthday.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead
I thought the same.Really beautiful pictures, although weirdly I don’t think any of them quite look like her - especially the one in red.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?