No tribute will make her outfit better!Has this been posted yet?
Now I get the short white dress/black heels combo.
Meghan Markle's subtle tribute to Princess Diana
Meghan Markle, 40, paid a touching tribute to late Princess Diana by carrying Christian Dior's Lady D-Lite bag, which retails at £3,450, as she stepped out for the Global Citizen Live event on Saturday.www.dailymail.co.uk
She really is a gormless lump.No tribute will make her outfit better!
Why would you even wear a short dress when you knew you were going to be on stage and the camera angle would be up your knickers?
Exactly what I thought Scotch.I've thought of another reason Smeggy has been eating all thepies and it could be intentional weight gain.
This must be her attempt at shutting down the surrogacy rumours. If you look at the comments on Daily Mail all of the comments are now about her "baby weight" and the conspiracy theories about her not having carried the child have evaporated. I'm sure that's exactly what she wanted.
No other pets... well there is a dog that I occasionally babysitOK he's yours and is on his way over. Got his own bedding. If you've got any other pets rehome them now. This evening. Thank you. Xx
This is part that lept out for me from that article:
The maths on this is queasy. The New York Times has previously reported that school meals comes in at a cost of $US1.75 ($A2.40) per day, so the cost of Meghan’s coat, pants, belt and shoes alone, never mind her jewellery, would equate to paying for 5083 meals for kids in New York
With cameras and media attention trained on her, Meghan could have used the moment to highlight any number of children’s authors, including women of colour, whose lives and careers would have been transformed by the exposure. Instead it was Meghan’s book in the limelight
sabotage themselves by doing it while Meghan is dressed like Imelda Marcos’ shopaholic cousin?
Nooo! If this is true, I'm truly done with the RFThis can't be true..
Queen extends olive branch to Harry & Meghan as she bestows new honour
QUEEN ELIZABETH II is said to be extending an olive branch to Harry and Meghan as she bestows a new honour.www.express.co.uk
It's the Express of course it's not true!! people slag the Mail off, but the Express is far far worse.This can't be true..
Queen extends olive branch to Harry & Meghan as she bestows new honour
QUEEN ELIZABETH II is said to be extending an olive branch to Harry and Meghan as she bestows a new honour.www.express.co.uk
OH MY GOD! Me too, re reading that at the moment and there are full pages where, as you say, you just change the name and It'no6 to a "T".I'm reading "That Woman" and holey moley - you could lift out whole passages, just change the names and dates, and apply it to these two!
Trans women don't have a cervix because they are men. There is no "bottom surgery" that will give a man the womb he needs to have a cervix.The cervix is the neck of the womb, without a womb there cannot be a cervix. "bottom surgery" is castration and a hole is made for sexual reasons. The hole has to be artificially stretched to accommodate a penis. Parts of the bowel are sometimes included. Allegedly the penis can be inverted to provide a sexual thrill. Regular insertion of a cone will extend the hole.Scotchy, I came here to post my ire about cervix issue! I do try and see all sides but I had to google 'Do trans women have a cervix?' (Apparently a very small percentage do depending on the procedure they have had.) However I woudn't consider that enough reason for Starmer's stance. The site I accessed was The Canadian Cancer Society - don't know what their reputation is but they kept talking about 'bottom surgery' for f**cks sake!!! What the f**ckdoes that even mean?!!!! Can we not use correct terminology in this brave new woke world?!!! I feel quite angry about this and won't vote for Labour again. Bloody WOKEISM is the link to the Harkles
Apologies, don't usually swear
If she was wearing any, of course.No tribute will make her outfit better!
Why would you even wear a short dress when you knew you were going to be on stage and the camera angle would be up your knickers?
Good Lord! Aren't there any suitable veterans in the United States they can call upon to present this? There are plenty of Congressmen/Women and Senators on both sides of the aisle who've served.
Also this is during COP26 which TQ is attending. They are literally going to try and overshadow every Royal engagement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?