Typical of her to bring up abuse and tit like that when shes addressing criticism. So inappropriate
I don't remember her linking the PTSD to the car accident, I think that was more speculation from forums tbh. She spoke about the PTSD affecting her during uni so it sounds like this was happening in the last few years rather than ages ago.I remember her talking about PTSD related to a car accident and injury she had?
cos she loves to be the victimI.... why is she bringing up PTSD. That is not productive to this conversation re privilege. Surely there is a better time and place to discuss her history with abuse, rather than in an Insta story that is supposed to be a response to valid criticism.
What i find so funny is that the headbands used to be £15 EACH now they’re £5 and the cotton pads used to be £5 each now they’re £1 lolYou can tell she has no idea. The way she markets tala as affordable irks me and shows how out of touch she is- or when she calls anything affordable really!
tala selling £40 leggings (won’t even go into skin luxe )
£15 a thong
£15 a pair of socks
£75 a fleece
And if you challenge her on it being affordable she goes on about how low the profit margins are, matching other brands etc. Maybe, but your idea of affordable brands is anything cheaper than lulu. Most people it’s Tesco £8 leggings.
you can say your products are fairly priced- don’t use word affordable
if airbus had a 50% off sale on bloody planes it would be a damn good deal, wouldn’t make them all of a sudden affordable just because it’s cheaper than something else. Especially when talking about luxury items like additional leggings.
I might have it mixed up! I just remember her discussing injury and PTSD, they might be unrelatedi think she mentioned having PTSD in the 2nd (maybe 3rd) year of uni, for some reason I always thought that the car accident was when she was small & that’s why she stopped gymnastics
it's her new favourite word, she seems to go though phases with overusing an "academic" style word, I cannot remember what the other ones she has over used in the past. I am convinced she has one of those "word a day" calendarsGood lord my IQ has just dropped significantly watching that..
She sort of looked like she’s about to cry in the last few - would you see a GENUINE serious businessman/woman ever do that ? No imagine bloody Richard Branson saying ‘sorry our plane crashed but I’ve actually overcome a lot of obstacles in my life’ absolutely not.
Sad to see her face so frozen and those teeth which sort of look like they don’t fit.. I preferred old school natural cute fun grace who posted gym videos and what I eat in a day.. simpler times!
Sorry final point - why’s she obsessed with saying nuance? Does she listen to the high low podcast or something because those two manage to slip that in to every bloody sentence
She's kind of stuck because she can't gain other people's trust without being fully transparent, which means being transparent not just about her own family and background but about her business practices. But now that she's constructed the issue as a question of a learning curve, she can't bring the business practices into it, because it's just inadequate and blatantly classist to excuse her exploitation of other, more vulnerable people as part of this 'learning curve'.
She's now exposed quite a personal detail about being a victim of severe abuse and IMO that is not something she should discuss now. It's manipulative to bring up abuse to escape accountability. But also, looking out for her own mental wellbeing, it will really hurt her to read people saying stuff like "it's manipulative to bring [your abuse] up now to deflect criticism", and it will hurt her to see people dismiss it, which is exactly what is going to happen and has already started to happen. I can't imagine thousands of people talking about my abuse in that way.
She just needs to put the phone down, not think about it for a while and come up with a response that respectfully addresses the issue - for her own sake and everyone else's.
innit! can see why she doesn't want to be the poster child for white upper class privilege, but if she wants any stake in the conversation she needs to be completely transparent about her experiences, or say nothing - realise this is bigger than her - and let people have the conversation without her. Its times like this when i feel sorry for her in a way because shes just a human trying to do her best but completely fails to understand why she receives this criticism.She's kind of stuck because she can't gain other people's trust without being fully transparent, which means being transparent not just about her own family and background but about her business practices. But now that she's constructed the issue as a question of a learning curve, she can't bring the business practices into it, because it's just inadequate and blatantly classist to excuse her exploitation of other, more vulnerable people as part of this 'learning curve'.
She's now exposed quite a personal detail about being a victim of severe abuse and IMO that is not something she should discuss now. It's manipulative to bring up abuse to escape accountability. But also, looking out for her own mental wellbeing, it will really hurt her to read people saying stuff like "it's manipulative to bring [your abuse] up now to deflect criticism", and it will hurt her to see people dismiss it, which is exactly what is going to happen and has already started to happen. I can't imagine thousands of people talking about my abuse in that way.
She just needs to put the phone down, not think about it for a while and come up with a response that respectfully addresses the issue - for her own sake and everyone else's.
Thing is though, she's chosen to do these 'jobs' that put her in the public eye, so she can't then shy away from being the poster child for that because that's what she is. If I were her and had all this money, I would spin it differently - like yes, I'm extremely wealthy, but here's how I'm using my background and platform to further good causes, and ones that may not be the Most profitable or whatever. Her whole thing was that TALA was ethical and sustainable gym wear and she's always saying it's sold at low profit or whatever...there is a way that she could've used her background to her advantage, but she hasn't because she keeps trying to gloss over it instead. I would've liked to see her talk about the privilege issue without mentioning her 'hard work' at all, that would've made it more authentic (not that it is anyway for the reason I said above). I just think it's a missed opportunity for her tbh, she can't get away from being rich but she can control how she uses it and this is Not Itcan see why she doesn't want to be the poster child for white upper class privilege