That BBC article is so biased.
It is all about what this man thinks and feels, and no opposing opinion is represented. Nor is the debate about the physical differences between males and females, and how many people believe that testosterone leaves are useless for determining the advantage of bio males over women.
The worst thing was saying that Sharon Davies was “heavily criticised” for defending women’s sport against males, implying that public and scientific opinion was universally against her. In reality, only TRAs were against her and she had a lot of support from normal people.
It is all about what this man thinks and feels, and no opposing opinion is represented. Nor is the debate about the physical differences between males and females, and how many people believe that testosterone leaves are useless for determining the advantage of bio males over women.
The worst thing was saying that Sharon Davies was “heavily criticised” for defending women’s sport against males, implying that public and scientific opinion was universally against her. In reality, only TRAs were against her and she had a lot of support from normal people.