Who's to blame here? The parents or the school
Either way this is appalling.
Who's to blame here? The parents or the schoola girl i work with told me her 7 year old step son is a year group with a trans identifying child. she is seven and female but identifies as a boy and even gets changed with the boys for pe…
He looks awful, definitely not a good advertisement for that beauty studio.Anothrr day, another beauty brand (well, retailer in this case) using men to sell make up to women.
The before:
View attachment 3014131
The after:
View attachment 3014132
I don’t know about you, but his gormless expression (I think he’s trying to slay, as my 12yo would say) doesn’t make me want to run out and buy that lipgloss. And what the fuck did he do to his right eye?
Comment:
View attachment 3014135
The Times is a Tory paper though, so they’re going to be big on the anti-Labour editorials.
That’s not to denigrate the paper (I am politically homeless, and The Guardian is a garbage fire compared with the Times/Telegraph IMO) just pointing out that all newspapers have political allegiances. I remember when The Mirror came out in support of Labour before the 1997 election and what a big deal that was.
I don't always have a problem with men selling makeup as I follow Wayne Goss and Robert Welsh on YouTube and enjoy their videos, but that looks like he allowed a young child to experiment with mummy's makeup on his face! He looked awful. That yellow around the eyes just looked like old bruises. Is he a parody account or something. He can't possibly think that's good make up applicationAnothrr day, another beauty brand (well, retailer in this case) using men to sell make up to women.
The before:
View attachment 3014131
The after:
View attachment 3014132
I don’t know about you, but his gormless expression (I think he’s trying to slay, as my 12yo would say) doesn’t make me want to run out and buy that lipgloss. And what the fuck did he do to his right eye?
Oh but that’s good news.Just run your trains on time
It’s definitely a statement. It states that the owner is a total fucking twat with more money than sense.Luxury belief takes on a whole new meaning
Anothrr day, another beauty brand (well, retailer in this case) using men to sell make up to women.
The before:
View attachment 3014131
The after:
View attachment 3014132
I don’t know about you, but his gormless expression (I think he’s trying to slay, as my 12yo would say) doesn’t make me want to run out and buy that lipgloss. And what the fuck did he do to his right eye?
Comment:
View attachment 3014135
Did a 7 year old girl apply that make up?! Looks like the shittest filter ever! Wear make up if you want, man or woman i don’t care, but ffs for the love of all that is holy PLEASE d
Anothrr day, another beauty brand (well, retailer in this case) using men to sell make up to women.
The before:
View attachment 3014131
The after:
View attachment 3014132
I don’t know about you, but his gormless expression (I think he’s trying to slay, as my 12yo would say) doesn’t make me want to run out and buy that lipgloss. And what the fuck did he do to his right eye?
Comment:
View attachment 3014135
Labour can fuck off & keep going.So Labour now wants to meet with JK Rowling:
'Rachel Reeves said the party would be “really happy” to “give her assurances” over its plans to change the process through which people can legally change gender.
Speaking in Scotland, Reeves said protection for women-only spaces would “absolutely stay”, adding: “We’re not going to be changing anything around biological sex … we’re really happy to talk to JK Rowling to give her assurances about that.”'
Starmer also seeing how the land lies makes one of his usual u-turns:
'Starmer echoed Reeves’s desire for the party to have a meeting with Rowling.
“I respect her,” he said of the author. “She has made some really important points. I’d welcome that discussion.'
JK Rowling agrees to meeting with Labour about gender transition policy
Author responds after shadow chancellor says party would be ‘really happy’ to ‘give her assurances’www.theguardian.com
So, Labour, and Starmer in particular, refuse to even acknowledge let alone apologise to Rosie Duffield, but are rushing to give assurances to an influential world famous author. They are so cynical.
JK Rowling says she's happy to meet with Labour if they first meet up with Keep Prisons Single Sex, Lesbian Labour, Women’s Right’s Network, Women’s Place UK and LGB Alliance. She's making it clear that she doesn't want a meeting for PR/window dressing purposes but for Labour to finally recognise and understand the rights that they are undermining and that we are trying to preserve. Given the previous statements of the likes of Lammy, Creasy, Rayner, Nandy etal, I think this is still meaningless.
This is exactly what I said a few threads back. Our office was told we should put our pronouns in our email signatures to be inclusive (no one has put they. The ones who have done it have used the pronoun you would have automatically assumed from their name or profile pic) but the same office has had a lift out of order so 3 people with differing disabilities or medical conditions have had to work on ground floor by themselves as they can't get up to 4th floor to join in with our team meetings. They just join via zoom and someone has their laptop in the meeting and zooms them when the meeting starts. Inclusive in a way that benefits no one, but exclusive in a way that discriminates 3 members of staff.I have been travelling over the last few days with a wheelchair user. The irony of being surrounded by flags and warm messages about how everyone’s important/equality for all when train companies are bloody hopeless at access requirements - ramps are missing, lifts aren’t working, the wheelchair space is next to the loo and full of luggage - just makes me want to scream.
Anyone who is LGB or even T and thinks big business cares is an idiot.
As is Emma fucking Bunton
There are loads of men who wear better makeup than that. Why not choose a male celeb who's known for it? Someone like Adam Lambert, for example.did a 7 year old apply that make up?! Ffs it’s awful, like the worst filter ever have we stooped this low that an advert featuring a man in make up is being used even though he looks like just cos he’s a man?! it’s 2024, if you want to wear make up just wear it JFC but don’t come at me looking like Stevie Wonder’s dug did your make up and expect me to tell you you look fabulous
I don’t have a problem with male make up artists and never have, it’s just the latest trend to have men modelling the products (aka taking work away from women) that pisses me off. Especially when they look shit to bootI don't always have a problem with men selling makeup as I follow Wayne Goss and Robert Welsh on YouTube and enjoy their videos, but that looks like he allowed a young child to experiment with mummy's makeup on his face! He looked awful. That yellow around the eyes just looked like old bruises. Is he a parody account or something. He can't possibly think that's good make up application
Adam Ant wore better make up than that!There are loads of men who wear better makeup than that. Why not choose a male celeb who's known for it? Someone like Adam Lambert, for example.
I could even understand using a drag queen in a cosmetic ad. The association between drag queens and makeup, often skilfully if not tastefully applied, is really strong and logical.
I love Robert Welsh - I think he’s a lot brighter and funnier than he acts in his clips though, but I think hendoesnI don't always have a problem with men selling makeup as I follow Wayne Goss and Robert Welsh on YouTube and enjoy their videos, but that looks like he allowed a young child to experiment with mummy's makeup on his face! He looked awful. That yellow around the eyes just looked like old bruises. Is he a parody account or something. He can't possibly think that's good make up application
I couldn't even try to watch it. Is this the world we live in now?I can't bring myself to watch it with sound, the visual is stressful enough, but these men time and time again prove exactly why we need safe spaces away from them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?