So you kind of wait for the person to ask, or just go with what they use initially? Would you say you have preferred or you really don't mind? Its great to hear the different takes on it. I'd say its less coercion and more giving the information beforehand to save awkwardness on behalf of both people in the situation. I feel like people think they are being imposed on them right now because social media etc have the option in their bio etc, but I think thats just a nice gesture, some would say virtue signalling, I would say making something just another everyday thing on your profile. I have it on things but I don't even think about it being there.
I transitioned young and 50 years ago so sadly few people are alive who knew me before. My best friend from childhood still is and she and I speak every day. But pretty much everyone in my family or that I know or work with was born after my transition. So it is in that sense not even a thing I have really needed to consider.
I guess my brother's son who is nearly 50 would find it prettty hard to correctly gender me as he has called me aunty all his life. As have his kids. Or his sisters kids - one of whom is gay and specifically asked me to be a big part of her ceremony when she married her wife just before the pandemic. A day I will always treasure.
These things are the choice of other people. Not you. I would not presume to tell them to call me anything. So never have. I guess like everyone they just say what best works. And I am fine with that. Life kind of makes these choices not ideology most of the time.
If someone wanted to say what they felt mattered I imagine I would smile and maybe clarify. Indeed I think I have been called he or man a few times in here over the past year. Never counted how ,many. But it is truthfully not something I think about day to day as it simply has never been an issue for me. I only recall one incident from a shopkeeper decades ago where I smiled and left the shop and just went to a different store next time to avoid the situation recurring.
What would causing a scene have achieved?
The world works on perception and most people try to be nice if you are nice to them.
Psychiatrists made clear long ago to me that understanding reality and how to live with that balance was a prerequisite of going forward with treatment when there were NO laws to fall back on so you effectively were accepted or not on how people took you..
I think that should be true today as if you freak out over a word then imo the last thing you should be doing is live the rest of your life that way and have irreversible surgery to live in fear of a missed pronoun. Those wanting self ID and see this kind of thorough psychiatric therapy up front as a negative never ask themelves why it was done - calling it conversion therapy. No it was realism therapy.
Sometimes saying no if a person cannot hack the world is the right thing. You cannot force people to agree with you. So you need to understand that before you ruin your life via irreversible transtion.
Another reason I think older transitioners are much more realistic. We had that programme now deemed evil when its aim was to see if you could hack it in the real world without expecting the world to change everything just for you.
So many these days would not last five minutes in that era - not if a word destroys your whole core personality.
Hence why saying yes to someone is not actually always being kind.