Just seen, this is about the 6th former who was hounded out of school
I was hounded out of school for 'transphobia'
There is no forgiveness for those who question dogma
unherd.com
I think it’s a shitstorm of all three.I know we’ve asked this a million times but WHY are they getting rid of woman but not man?
Is it
A: because actual trans females are offended by being called women? But still must know they are and will suffer female health issues?
B: Trans males don’t want to be reminded they are not women so won’t suffer from these?
C: organisations ASSUMING one or both of these?
That is certainly bleakI have some theories but they’re quite dark and dystopian. Briefly, I envision biological women becoming a sort of silent underclass with no language to express femaleness. Women will be imprisoned for speaking out, and will be subjected to abuse in prisons from trans-identifying male criminals. In other words, a bleak picture.
I hope I’m wrong.
I think a lot of people don’t care about anything that doesn’t directly impact them.I know we’ve asked this a million times but WHY are they getting rid of woman but not man?
Is it
A: because actual trans females are offended by being called women? But still must know they are and will suffer female health issues?
B: Trans males don’t want to be reminded they are not women so won’t suffer from these?
C: organisations ASSUMING one or both of these?
I would be happy right now for it to either say female or male cancers, I’ve given up with hoping ‘woman’ will ever be typed again on an NHS page. But the very fact it says MEN but no women is just batshit. I just called my bf raging and he said, I am annoyed but don’t really get as mad as you about things. I said, well there’s your definition of privilege, and you should be raging on behalf of your daughter, if no one else. Does anyone else feel like there is just no point trying to have these conversations with men sometimes as they are so unaffected by it.
Yeh I agree, if I wasn't reading here I wouldn't really have an idea about the extent to waht is happening.I think a lot of people don’t care about anything that doesn’t directly impact them.
Not just limited to men when it comes to sexism, a lot of white people don’t care about racism, a lot of young people don’t care about ageism, a lot of straight people don’t care about gay rights and so on.
It’s quite depressing and I don’t think they’re ‘bad’ people. A lot just have busy and stressful lives so they don’t have the time or energy to care about things that don’t impact them directly.
The aim is to remove woman as a sex class. If they remove it from everywhere in life then *women* becomes undefinable and irrelevant in law. If you cannot explain what a woman is, then there is no way you can fight for it. A very good example of this recently was in the Texas senate hearing on abortion rights. When asked what is a woman?, the democrat women arguing to keep abortion legal could not answer (refused to answer) it was completely absurd and of course they lost. They probably were always going to lose, but if you can't explain who's rights you are fighting for then you will automatically lose by default.I know we’ve asked this a million times but WHY are they getting rid of woman but not man?
Is it
A: because actual trans females are offended by being called women? But still must know they are and will suffer female health issues?
B: Trans males don’t want to be reminded they are not women so won’t suffer from these?
C: organisations ASSUMING one or both of these?
I would be happy right now for it to either say female or male cancers, I’ve given up with hoping ‘woman’ will ever be typed again on an NHS page. But the very fact it says MEN but no women is just batshit. I just called my bf raging and he said, I am annoyed but don’t really get as mad as you about things. I said, well there’s your definition of privilege, and you should be raging on behalf of your daughter, if no one else. Does anyone else feel like there is just no point trying to have these conversations with men sometimes as they are so unaffected by it.
Yeah, it's a shame they couldn't just talk through things rather than attack her. It seems we've lost the ability to debate.Yeh I agree, if I wasn't reading here I wouldn't really have an idea about the extent to waht is happening.
That poor girl hounded out of school, I feel bad for students now tbh, it was a difficult enough time when I was a teenager 20 years ago but looking at it now I am so glad I didn't have to live through this
I too live in hope that it will soon be challenged more and that young people will start to think for themselves rather than accepting this brain washing cult.That is certainly bleak
I am an optimistic soul - I feel this cult of trans we are going through is a societal phase of self-indulgent navel-gazing.
It is a movement that will implode when enough people realise it is a meaningless load of bollocks, created by a very small but demanding group of individuals.
There was a scene like that in the Matt Walsh documentary. Young female students unable (and some unwilling) to define “woman” on a Women’s March and saying “but yes, of course some men can get pregnant”.A very good example of this recently was in the Texas senate hearing on abortion rights. When asked what is a woman?, the democrat women arguing to keep abortion legal could not answer (refused to answer) it was completely absurd and of course they lost.
I can never get any of my comments published in the Daily Mail.I left a comment on the DM article that the same hasn't happened to the NHS pages on prostate, testicular and penile cancers and it hasn't been published. Guess that was moderated as offensive
Which of course, is not true. Only women can get pregnant and some of those women may identify as male.There was a scene like that in the Matt Walsh documentary. Young female students unable (and some unwilling) to define “woman” on a Women’s March and saying “but yes, of course some men can get pregnant”.
As I have said a million times, no point attempting to put truth into this when even medical personal are going along with this madness.Which of course, is not true. Only women can get pregnant and some of those women may identify as male.
To me, this is the be all and end all. Previously, I was sympathetic and tried to be understanding (and still am, to an extent) of people with genuine dysphoria but it’s a beast that has got far out of control to the point where it’s now a free for all. Like others have echoed previously, it’s only going to harm the people who are actually affected by this, the fly-by-nights and the do-gooders will move onto the next cause when it arrives and won’t remember, or give a flying duck, about the casualties they’ve left behind to pick up the pieces they shattered by bulldozing through.The only way to stop this going further along a very dark route with various chilling end points is to stop people being able to identify as non binary or a different gender to how they were born.
Yep. The biggest mistake this country made was allow people (let’s be honest, it was just men) to change the sex on their birth certificates. Ludicrous. It’s a legal document and shouldn’t be allowed to be changed under any circumstances. That was the starting point of this madness.The only way to stop this going further along a very dark route with various chilling end points is to stop people being able to identify as non binary or a different gender to how they were born.
It should be seen in the same way as an adult trying to identify as a child or a white person trying to identify as black? either strange or laughable.
Thanks for the heads up. I am about 20 minutes in [to the Matt Walsh documentary] and I have to say I am pretty disappointed by his tone. He just seems like a smarmy neckbeard who enjoys the smell of his own farts. Whilst the people he's interviewing seem mostly batshit, he is abrupt and rude with them. He's interviewing a university professor, and asked him what the difference is between sex and gender. The professor gives a convoluted reply, so in the edit, they have faded it in an out and put music over the top. Unncessary.no, I watched free on a site called odysee.com - I typed it in and loads of results came up. In HD and not a single advert in the whole film, unlike Youtube
Matt Walsh was never going to be neutral. I think he was calm and kinder than needed, he didn't laugh - which must have been hard. Can you imagine sitting with some of the US's top 'gender affirmers and surgeons' and them spouting that crock of tit? Social contagion 'maybe' attributes to a 'teeny tiny bit' to the numbers; when we know it contributes massively. Do chickens have gender identity? Do they cry? Seriously??Thanks for the heads up. I am about 20 minutes in [to the Matt Walsh documentary] and I have to say I am pretty disappointed by his tone. He just seems like a smarmy neckbeard who enjoys the smell of his own farts. Whilst the people he's interviewing seem mostly batshit, he is abrupt and rude with them. He's interviewing a university professor, and asked him what the difference is between sex and gender. The professor gives a convoluted reply, so in the edit, they have faded it in an out and put music over the top. Unncessary.
He should take some lessons from Louis Theroux in respect, netrality and sensitivity. It just doesn't help the cause at all.
I thought similar thoughts to you, but only to the first five minutes when he was navel gazing and saying things like “do I exist? Who am I?” which I thought was ridiculous and unnecessary but I found the doc overall really good, and I didn’t pick up on him being rude or smarmy (though I thought exactly the same as you about the professor and the music in the background interspersed with footage of the professor droning on when it was obvious that Matt was asking him questions in between but those questions were edited out to make it seem like the proff was droning).Thanks for the heads up. I am about 20 minutes in [to the Matt Walsh documentary] and I have to say I am pretty disappointed by his tone. He just seems like a smarmy neckbeard who enjoys the smell of his own farts. Whilst the people he's interviewing seem mostly batshit, he is abrupt and rude with them. He's interviewing a university professor, and asked him what the difference is between sex and gender. The professor gives a convoluted reply, so in the edit, they have faded it in an out and put music over the top. Unncessary.
He should take some lessons from Louis Theroux in respect, netrality and sensitivity. It just doesn't help the cause at all.