*goes off to have a look*I’m really weirded out by that one poster in the secret celeb gossip thread.
*goes off to have a look*I’m really weirded out by that one poster in the secret celeb gossip thread.
Agreed. I have backed you up on the thread.The other one is fine to me, a bit crude for
my liking but they seem to have calm down the past few days and can seem to have serious discussions.
But I’m getting manic and creepy from the one I was originally talking about.
I agree, I'm not completely against trans people. I respect them as individuals, think they deserve rights etc. I just think the whole movement needs critical conversation and people shouldn't be shot down as "transphobic" for having different views on certain things.Whenever this subject comes up, online or offline, I tend to express my disinterest bordering on distaste for the whole debate.
The idea that women’s rights and rights of trans people cannot coexist is a ridiculous misnomer. In my view though, that isn’t what either extremes of the debate wants. They want the culture war, because they enjoy it.
They get a buzz from it. It makes them feel important. If I HAD to pick a side it would probably be the GC side because at least they didn’t start it.
Oh, will need to have a look. I enjoy taking online bullies down to Chinatown.
100% agree.I agree, I'm not completely against trans people. I respect them as individuals, think they deserve rights etc. I just think the whole movement needs critical conversation and people shouldn't be shot down as "transphobic" for having different views on certain things.
Indeed. They are not interested in that. Just in sticking it to their opponents in their imaginary culture war.I would say 99% of people in this debate don't hate trans people. But it's always turned to look like that because playing the victim tends to work.
I mean, the question is usually clear. What rights do they not have? We just want an answer.
I know there are still people who won't hire lesbians or gays, or who won't rent them a place. If that happens to trans people, and I'm sure it does, let's talk about it. That's a legit problem that needs to be solved. But we don't hear a word about that.
There definitely are those trans people who just want to get on with their lives but honestly, after spending so much time in this debate I really think the traits of playing the victim etc are a feature and not a bug.I genuinely believe their are trans people out there sick of it all themselves. Like they just want to live their lives in peace but as the opposite sex, well aware that they are truly the other, so make sure it's on medical records etc, not expecting the world to change just for them. The loud ones are proper narcissists, that's why they play the victim so bloody well and why they think the world should bend to their wants. The world seems to be falling for this narcissistic rage attack and its ridiculous.
Nor should it. It’s not as if women aren’t often seemingly attracted to older men. Age is also a protected characteristic and shouldn’t be portrayed pejoratively with terms such as “disgusting”.I can’t see this changing ever
Sir Hare: Actors kissing women 20 years their junior is 'disgusting'
Sir David Hare has confessed that the 20-year difference between Bill Nighy and Rachel Weisz in his 2011 BBC thriller Page Eight was 'disgusting and so wrong', reported The Telegraph.www.dailymail.co.uk
That’s a very fair point. I have seen some of the TERF side posting and spouting some absolute hatred but it does seem to be less common.I'm reading a lot about 'both sides' when it's definitely one that's publicly threatening to rape, punch, kill, kerb-stomp
I do care, but only from the point of view that I wish to understand the circumstances the produces these monsters so that policies can be shaped so that the world stops producing them." I'm in a FB group of old school friends - all female. I posted about Sarah, explaining the circs for those not in the UK. One, a very right-on lawyer, thinks perhaps that piece of tit had been abused or tortured in childhood... I DONT CARE!! "
I just posted this on the Sarah Everard thread, but I think it fits here too. Bloody excuses for men.
Sorry to quote myself from yesterday, but this person has just suggested, apparently in all seriousness, that satanic rituals were involved
Who cares? It could be a 25 year old playing at 35 year old female character and and 45 year old playing a 40 year old male character.Right well if age should not be portrayed as disgusting, why is it always much younger women than their male counterparts in said roles?
And no one is saying that older men are disgusting. I think you've missed the point entirely
I would think it odd certainly, because it would be in fact unusual. But I would also think it was none of my business.I think sometimes, people use 'age' and 'consenting adults' to shield strange behaviour. For example, does anyone really think it's fine and normal for a 19 year old to be dating say a 50 year old just because the 19 year old is an 'adult'? This also to me ignores that age cut offs are largely arbitrary, but necessary for legal and policy reasons. We need, legally, an age that we can say 'this person is an adult now' and from that flows a whole host of legal rights etc. But that doesn't detract at all from the fact that ages around 18 and over are still very young adults, and therefore more susceptible/vulnerable to power imbalances that come from big age gaps.