Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

DoraMaar

VIP Member
Ugh, that's frightening. 😡
🇮🇪

Ireland has long been a key driver of gender identity policy

The Irish LGBTIQ+ agenda is not only an expanding one, but also a pioneering one.
In recent years we have seen the development of a coordinated European agenda in which Ireland plays a leading role and helps shape and export policies across European institutions. Irish politicians, activists and activist-politicians have been instrumental in pushing for transactivist policies in international institutions, and in driving the shift towards a gender identity focus within the EU. From Mary Robinson to Michael O’Flaherty, Maria Walsh to Leo Varadkar.


Ireland has long been a key driver of gender identity policy
March 30, 2026
|
Gript Column
|
Comment Ireland

Listen to this article
7 min

Listen to this article
7 min
In a few months, on July 1st, Ireland will take over the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union, also referred to as the presidency of the EU. This last happened 13 and a half years ago and will happen again in roughly that time. The presidency lasts for six months.

During that time you can expect a lot of very important high-level meetings, very busy side events and a very enthusiastic celebration of European values and democracy – which will include “efforts to promote and protect LGBTIQ+ rights”.

I am not saying this based on my assumptions, but on the National LGBTIQ+ Inclusion Strategy II – Action Plan 2025–2026 of the Government of Ireland.

One of its strategic objectives, placed under Pillar 4 (Equality and Non-Discrimination), is to advance the protection and promotion of LGBTIQ+ rights at an international level. This includes the UN, the EU, the Council of Europe, the OECD and the OSCE; embassy networks, outreach and funding initiatives, and specifically: the EU’s LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy, and the Irish EU presidency.

You can also find this in Ireland’s Programme for Government, with the explicit commitment to “engage in discussions at key international forums, including the EU and the UN, to uphold the universal nature of human rights, ensuring that these rights apply equally to all individuals, regardless of gender identity, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic”.

The Irish LGBTIQ+ agenda is not only an expanding one, but also a pioneering one. In recent years we have seen the development of a coordinated European agenda in which Ireland plays a leading role and helps shape and export policies across European institutions. Irish politicians, activists and activist-politicians have been instrumental in pushing for transactivist policies in international institutions, and in driving the shift towards a gender identity focus within the EU. From Mary Robinson to Michael O’Flaherty, Maria Walsh to Leo Varadkar.

At the recent European Parliament vote, 12 of the 14 Irish MEPs supported the call to emphasise the importance of the recognition of trans identified men as women. This included Irish members of the European political groups of the Left, the Socialists and Democrats, and the Liberals, as well as the biggest and most influential group in the European Parliament: the European People’s Party and Christian Democrats, or EPP, a group “driven by a centre-right political vision”, of which Fine Gael is a founding member.

When it comes to gender identity, the EPP has become an immovable object. If anything, it is turning into an unstoppable force.

Last year, the LGBTIQ+ network within the EPP changed its name to EPPride. It is an associated entity within the EPP, with Fine Gael as one of its ten members. EPPride participated in the creation of the EPP election manifesto, cooperates with the EPP’s think tank, and gives workshops on “Strengthening the LGBT+ voice as part of the centre-right narrative”.

Meanwhile, Fianna Fáil, part of the European liberal Renew group, contributes its part; and both parties join forces in their relentless push to make Ireland best in class and to ease the burden of the collective failings of the past.

They talk to EU commissioners, lobby the committees and the European Parliament, and have repeatedly made their priorities clear:

expansion of self-ID regulations to include minors and to create a legal non-binary category
comprehensive bans on conversion therapy: a proposal from 2018 in Ireland went so far as to include a global jurisdiction clause concerning Irish citizens abroad
“the need to ensure equal recognition for families under Irish law”, which is code for surrogacy legalisation nationally and internationally
and hate speech and hate crime laws.
All of this comes with continued “international advocacy”, which is now aided by former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar, who holds a position as Senior Fellow in the Global LGBTQI+ Human Rights Program at Harvard Kennedy School, leading a project titled “The Future of LGBTQI+ Rights in the European Union“.

Here, the transactivist demands transform into policy language and emerge shapeshifted as equality, citizenship, democracy, the rule of law, non-discrimination, inclusion and values. For this, Varadkar will devise “a baseline of rights and protections that every EU member state should aspire to” and will be meeting stakeholders across Europe – equipped with connections, influence, reputation and resources.

In this framing, there are three aspects to particularly look out for:

burying women’s rights and violence against women in a linguistic and conceptual fog of gender and gender-based violence
a focus on sexual and reproductive health and rights as a policy field, advancing the interests of a male sexual rights movement that disguises the exploitation of women through surrogacy as “equality for rainbow families”
centring the debate around values and human dignity, using this framing to mobilise programmes, campaigns and resources, while expanding the scope of regulation into areas of justice and rule of law, shifting the issue away from women’s rights and presenting it instead as a priority concern of democracy
Under the banner of “human rights”, high-profile and heavily resourced stakeholders are advancing the interests of a sexual rights industry that profits from the sexual and reproductive exploitation of women while erasing women as a political and legal category altogether.

Ireland wants the driver’s seat when it comes to shaping this future of human rights. In August 2028, Europe will “follow the Rainbow” to Ireland for EuroPride.

This may all look grim. And it is. But it is important to understand what we are up against, and to know when, where and why we draw a line.
 
  • Sick
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 14

StringyMango

VIP Member
The glaring error is the use of the word, “She”. He’s a man, but had to laugh about “While not always in jobs” too. Unemployable I’d say. Could you imagine the nightmare of working with a forever offended difficult bugger like him.
And there was me thinking that Euan was so happy after buying an M&S bra. My heart bleeds for him...not.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 14

Vanelope

VIP Member
I looked up wealthiest authors

1 JKR
2 James Patterson
3 Danielle Steel

All that horrific thing - popular. Anything by that encourages reading rather than AI YouTube skip is fine by me. I despair about how to get my kids into reading because they like it rather than me forcing them to. (Also two women which I did like)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14

funkimunki1984

VIP Member
I’m actually sickened at how this is trying to creep in the back door (excuse the term). How can anyone with common sense and decency think this is ok? And to try and get it passed as a bill to make it legal is sickening!! LGB and fuck the T and whatever else comes after it.
 
  • Angry
  • Sick
  • Like
Reactions: 14

VC10

VIP Member


So Women’s Hour decides to talk about misogyny and thinks that a cross-dressing man is exactly the right person to discuss this with. I genuinely am so pissed off about this. Women’s Hour of all programmes?
Its the bbc. They are well gone, and have been so for donkey's years....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14

goldshoes

VIP Member
I thought courts were meant to be about truth and fact? A man commits a very male crime, one that is viewed with disgust by any normal person, yet the court indulges his fetish by using female pronouns? ( I noticed that The Courier only uses his surname).
These are not women’s crimes. However much these bloody creepy weird men may claim to feel or “identify“ as women they can’t help themselves but behave like the very worst types of men.
They so often seem to be political activists too. All very “out there” hardly delicate little dollies than need to be protected.
Everyone in that court room performing any function has taken an oath of some sort - whether the judicial oath or that of the Bar or Solicitors' branch and of course, witnesses giving evidence swear or affirm as follows: -
An example of Oath:
I swear by (relevant religious text) that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth’
An example of affirmation:
‘I do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth’
These are all predicated on telling the truth and yet an egregious lie as to the sex of the Defendant is allowed to pass as a version of the truth.
Those oaths mean nothing apparently.

Sorry but I stand by George Wahington and the cherry tree!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14

VeniVidiVicki

VIP Member
Julie Bindel’s review of Trans Mission

 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13

maytoseptember

VIP Member
he's been fairly quiet of late

Sign of the wind changing . . . he'll be trying to build himself a bit of plausible deniability.
He’s also a father now, and may have some reservations about sterilising young kids.

I like DR. I think he comes across really well in interviews. It’s a shame he felt he had to bend to the TRA side, but perhaps that was self preservation on his part.

Maybe I’m being too optimistic. I would rather the likes of DR turn out to be cowards than genuinely believe JKR is evil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13

JAR21

VIP Member


Khalif is fighting a female boxer in a professional boxing match in Paris next month. Why is this being allowed? It's disappointing that his opponent doesn't seem to value her own safety enough to refuse to get into a ring with a man.
So not only is she fighting a man, she's fighting a much younger and probably fitter man, as their Olympics are 8 years apart.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 13