I think they rehearse in Penrith occasionally, but seem to be in Lancaster most of the time, so meeting halfwayHer house looks lovely and a nice setting too. I wonder where Helen and Gorka are training for Strictly, as Helen is living with her parents up in Carlisle and doesn't Gemma live Bury way, surely he's not doing a 4 hour round trip each day. I guess it might be worth is to spend half the week at home instead of down in London like previous years
Gemma seems to be very sensible about money compared to a lot of ex-soapstars - just thinking of some ex Corrie folk who have declared bankruptcy or seem to live well beyond their means. And her and Gorka seem to pay for all the big stuff themselves, rather than say, setting up a home or interiors account for their new house and getting loads of gifted stuff (their garden alone must have cost them an absolute fortune and I like how they used a local business too)She owns two houses in Manchester and is a landlord. I think she's doing ok financially. She hammered the lads mags back in the day and they definitely paided the big money.
I feel like it was an offer on the table, money in the pocket and morals out the window. Guessing at this point it's securing Mias future. It's a very hard line to tow morals/money. She definitely could of done better with her own clothing line added to the gym wear but no doubt that's more work and precarious.
I think the issue is with Gemma that she does in a way portray to be socially conscious and and animal lover etc so joining with ITS doesnt fit with that. We all need money but it doesnt mean we would do something that goes against our morals. She has her finger in many pies so i doubt she’s skint.Doesn't make any difference surely... She's banking it whilst she can. I'd do the same!
This is it exactly...she seems such a good person who does her bit environmentally etc so to be taking money from an awful brand like ITS who churn out collection after collection of cheap and nasty fast fashion daily,the majority of which will end up in landfill, just comes across like she switches her principles on and off depending on how big the pay cheque is !I think the issue is with Gemma that she does in a way portray to be socially conscious and and animal lover etc so joining with ITS doesnt fit with that. We all need money but it doesnt mean we would do something that goes against our morals. She has her finger in many pies so i doubt she’s skint.
I mean I think that's fair enough: I don't think anyone would describe ITS as high fashion tbf.
The hypocrisy of complaining about child working standards for a high-end designer yet promoting ITS which is effectively slave labour. Recent stories of factory workers doing 20 miles per day on the shop floor and not being allowed toilet breaks, paid pennies per item they make........
I think you've missed the point. She's preaching about child labour but is conveniently ignoring the fact ITS has dodgy work conditions for adults.I mean I think that's fair enough: I don't think anyone would describe ITS as high fashion tbf.
I didn't know that: thanks for the info.I think you've missed the point. She's preaching about child labour but is conveniently ignoring the fact ITS has dodgy work conditions for adults.
Quoting myself here as I notice I've made a mistake in the above post!I didn't know that: thanks for the info.
I also thought the Balenciaga scandal was about the child sexual abuse connotations.
This ITS gig must be paying an absolute fortune-for Gemma to be throwing - I thought it was a bad match because of the style and quality of the clothes but to think she's working with a controversial company in terms of work conditions is even more perplexing and disappointing. A bad fit all round.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?