Absolutely agree. Totally irresponsible. Not at all researched and clearly not tested. She really should of suggested to people with skin concerns that they might be best to check with a dermatologist first etc. But noo all about the coinage!I just watched yesterday’s vlog and at first she says that the bruises at her chin are from the blackhead remover, so she shows things first for the cash and then tests them? Shouldn’t she be testing stuff at first and see if they work then promote them ? Such an irresponsible behavior![]()
Let her, remember what happened last time she triedAlso- one thing, I will not be surprised if she tries to throw this site under the bus for exposing her.
Yes Josie was definitely being malicious and trying to get her minions to start on the person she tagged in the story.I can't wait for her to receive that email or call from Caudalie telling her that they are ending their collaboration and future work stuff.
Absolutely!! 100%
However, Josie was doing it to be malicious in the attempts that her fans would bully the girl. Josie is literally trying to educate a WOC. She should just STFU and listen. Educate herself, take a break from social media, and then come back when she really comes to terms on how much of a shit person she is and is honestly working on herself.
SaltyCaramelTart had the TIME today, gals and pals!I have a legal background and I don't know what claim she'd have against us. Criminal law isn't my specialty, admittedly, but I do know a little about defamation, which is what I suspect she'd try to go after people for. Defamation is a strict liability offence - dependent on facts of defamation and not the intention of the defendant. As a person, she would have a right to sue for defamation. A permanent statement would potentially be libellous, rather than slanderous (Monson v Tussauds). It is no longer a crime. She can take action if she can prove that she suffered serious harm (s1(1) Defamation Act 2013 ("DA")).
For a statement to be defamatory, it must have lowered Josie in the eyes of right-thinking members of society generally (Sim v Stretch), cause Josie to be shunned or avoided (Youssoupoff v MGN) or expose her to hatred, ridicule or contempt (Berkoff v Burchill). She's been named, so the cases I know on identification are irrelevant. The statement must be published to a valid third party - that's satisfied as this is a public site. A repeat libel is still libel (s8 DA). But then comes the fun part: Defences.
Truth would be our defence. It is available under s2 DA and it is absolute. The sting of the libel needs to be true - in this case I would say that the sting is what Stephanie called out. That is what is going to cause Josie harm. Therefore it is a defamatory imputation of fact, the burden is on us to prove that she posted those stories, which there are screenshots of, so that's satisfied & any malice, knowledge and fault of our members is considered to be irrelevant.
Therefore, I would not advise Josie, if I were her solicitor, to take on a case of defamation. It would blow up in her face, she would lose money and she would further damage her reputation. This is a really abridged answer, but yeah it would be throwing good money after bad.
She’s probably figuring out how to spin the next scandal or in here busy reading.where is todays's vlog? Or is it a 2 day rest ?
You didnt go as far as Charlyboy...he would have said where ( and why) the lying and stress originate... and how it moved to the CotswoldsTouching your face a lot is a sign of lying.
Lying gives you stress you want to alleviate by touching your face and it's also a subconscious effort to cover your mouth, so you won't be able to speak.
(OMG I sound just like know-it-all Charlie)
As you sow, so you shall reap, Josie darling.Guys she’s being slaughtered on Twitter! Search by her name.
She has had plenty of time to explain and apologise. Now she's gaslighted and cried wolf. I will not accept any apology from her. She is a privileged nitwit. I think more people should write to her sponsors. I definitely will. She has no shame! She chose a bad time and place to feign the victim (again).Even if she were to put up an apology - I just don't think i could accept it.
Like we all already know she's been fawning over her garden and a mac and cheese - that at this point would just feel like a PR Apology to justify her wrongdoings and not a lesson.