Yeah, hasn't that literally been the stereotype for women in corporate jobs for years (and years and years) ?
Just saw she has posted a new video, anyone want to sacrifice themselves and watch it and report back here if it actually brought anything of value please? After having suffered through her last one for about two minutes actually cannot bring myself to even click on this one...as am still feeling a bit uncomfortable about the last one...I suppose at least the new video relates to the kind of law she actually studied and worked with.
I watched most of it. She should just retire from YouTube already. It's much less tasteless than the other one purely because it's such a stupid case surrounding the petty fight between two famous-for-no-reason "celebrities" and nobody died this time. But it's just more of Eve's tired, talentless, cash-grab bullshit.
Almost the entire video has on-screen ads for Fiver, along with a tonne of intrusive, incredibly cheap and amateurish animations. If this is the best Eve could find on Fiver, it doesn't exactly sell the platform well.
Eve spends the whole video obnoxiously flapping her hands around a lot while not saying anything new, anything of merit and just recycles content from other sources. All for a video about a fluff story that's old news.
She's somehow left it too late to talk about the case when it was trending and relevant, but didn't wait a few weeks until the verdict was announced to discuss the complete story. It's so sloppily constructed.
I don't really know what the point in any of what she's doing now is. She's paying other people to do all her work for her, so you would expect some new measure of quality or substance, but the end result is still so wafer-thin, lazy and half-assed. She also doesn't bring anything to the table at all. She offers no legal perspective beyond that which anyone who'd looked up the Wikipedia entry for 'defamation' could also provide. In fact, she seems to be Googling this shit in real time while filming and reading scripted information put together by her paid researcher for the most basic shit. Her input is basically: "Here's a recap of the case as found via Google. Who knows what will happen with the verdict, but it'll be interesting to see. Follow me on social media."
It's kind of easy to see why she pivoted away from wanting to practice law so quickly - she's trying real hard to be cool, charming and charismatic and coming across as pretentious, smarmy and condescending, but also can't seem to retain even basic legal information even though her entire studytube career was build around pushing toxic productivity and rote memorisation. If these videos are indicative of her courtroom prowess, research skills and on-the-spot thinking, then she must've been one shitty lawyer.
She also spends a substantial chunk of the video talking to the camera in this pose for some reason. It looks so fucking awkward.
Is this another of her bizarre "business meeting" things? "I only give speeches when sitting on a desk in Converse. But when I'm on my practicing-the-law game, you know I'm changing things up by leaning across the desk to get all up in the judge and jury's grills. They won't know if you're awkwardly trying to seduce them or getting all confrontational and trying to psych them out, but either way, it will increase your chance of winning a case by 36%, 23% of the time!"
You could read the Wikipedia page on the case in 5 minutes and get more information than this 22 minute extended ad.