Making it difficult for new Tattlers to find her.
Ellie Grey #5 Wake me up before you go GLO
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Ellie Grey Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
she’ll soon put her name back up. After all, if she’s looking for a ‘charidy’ to support, she’ll have to be visible and with some kind of following. bleep.
Seeing this is so upsetting. Why would you bring a young child to a protest and start behaving like that! Makes me feel sick and very sad hearing him cry to his dad!
She might be doing some Instagram cleansing ritual.
She’ll be in a nuns habit next
She’ll be in a nuns habit next
Slippery as a nipple, that one.
She ducks, she dives, she blags, she skives. A change of name, a flick of the hair, she’s Ellie (Someone) and she don’t care
She ducks, she dives, she blags, she skives. A change of name, a flick of the hair, she’s Ellie (Someone) and she don’t care
I wonder if she’s going for a super cleanse, given how many people with large followings she’s abused recently? Dr Ranj, Dr O’Riordan? Could be they’ve decided to instruct lawyers. Now wouldn’t THAT be ironic! Still, at least with that brilliant legal brain of hers, she won’t have to shell out for legal representation. She can just appear in court under her own steam. Judge John Deed couldn’t hold a candle to her.
No but she will probably say that she was, or instagram was trying to get rid of her.
She's just looking for abit of attention from her deciples, while she makes her changes.
I did notice that her post count had gone down significantly. I reckon she’s rebranding as a ‘earth mother’ / natural medicine promoter.
All the legal stuff will be dropped and she won’t mention it again
But Liey... we have the screenshots
Ok, well I eagerly await her GLO up...
If they wanted a ‘Cull’ a great big duck off war would’ve done the trick & “The Elite“ could’ve hid in bunkers.I just need to stop thinking at the risk of 'free thinking', but this morning I was sitting just trying to work out some of their logic! Probably been discussed before, but I was trying to work out what they are actually thinking as they have to realise what they are spouting is contradicting their own arguments regularly.
Firstly we have the idea that the whole thing is a Population Cull...why did we bother locking down? Why are we shielding the vulnerable, etc. If there was a genuine population cull you'd keep it secret, keep the majority of people mixing other than your select few, and I'm pretty sure that in that scenario shielding the vulnerable is a bad idea as obviously they would be most easy to kill off, and probably more expendable (and expensive to have live) to whoever is coordinating it. I apologise if any of that sounds a bit blunt, but thinking about it logically and with numbers rather than emotions and humanity. So why are we working hard to stop people mixing as that goes against any cull.
Vaccines - chips? Well not being funny but why are they starting with 90 year old Doris that sits in the same seat most days (and again because of the cull suggestions it makes no sense to vaccinate the vulnerable first, surely the people behind it would decide other than their own mums they'd just expend the rest!)? Oh, and they want to kill fertility...again why are they wasting them on Doris first then? They'd have been best getting the kids, teens and 20-30s first rather than last. In fact they still haven't said whether all teens will be vaccinated...so why are we trying to stop everyone being fertile but starting at the wrong end of age spectrum?! Also, let's be honest, we've seen the outcomes of incest and genetic disorders that come from essentially 'inbreeding'. Anyone organising this would be stupid as affecting everyone's fertility but a few would ultimately even wipe their own gene lines out as they breed more and more genetic issues within a few generations! There are probably easier and cheaper ways of doing it that doesn't involve paying masses of doctors and nurses to inject millions of post-menopausal women first. If they wanted to go down that route they could have easily "created a fake disease" that affected people in their child bearing years or earlier.
And, if any of this was to be believed by the sane, surely you'd realise that the fact you are spreading information about rallies and protests on social media and info that Bill Gates can probably access easier and quicker than waiting for younger age groups to receive 'chips', if they really wanted to cull or cause infertility, they would be able to turn up at these events and use various agents to cull or cause infertility. The money and right people would likely be able to arrange things like that if any of it was plausible as seemingly this is all about 'money and the few elite'. And surely this 'free thinking' lot would be seen as the problem and be the first! I just don't understand the thinking behind any of it and why not one of them can actually take a step back and realise that absolutely nothing they are talking about makes any sense and that there are likely much easier ways to go about the whole thing than staging a global pandemic!
Yes there are a lot of mistakes being made and a lot of money involved, but in any crisis let's be honest there are going to be people that profit off of anything! Do we bad mouth funeral directors for taking money and profit in that scenario? Do we have a go at Birds Eye or farmers for daring trying to make a profit off of an essential need to eat? Should the gyms that typically make a profit be allowed to open after all of this, as how dare they? What about those who have set up online mediation classes throughout this? Or those trying to sell 'natural' skin care? No one should ever be allowed to make a profit EVER as obviously they must be involved in some sort of evil! Yes, some of the money and profiteering is sickening, but does it indicate anything other than the greed of some when they know there is desperation?
also “The Elite” surely if you subscribe to that theory wouldn’t Trump be part of it too? He certainly isn’t short of a few quid
She is a Nun, when she is asked by the authorities for her occupation she always says ‘Nun’
©️BlackadderThere are days where I think it would be easier to ignore them and let them shout into their ECHO chamber. There is really no reasoning with them, and well arguing with crazy...
But then they hold up people considered to be knowledgeable and respectable, and it does worry me. I feel like they should be held legally liable should anyone found to follow them die as a result of poor decisions or misinformation made by 'influencers'. They are out there bleating about the vaccine companies not being held liable, but don't have any problem saying what they want. Want the government sued for their public health media campaigns, etc. yet probably wouldn't want legal responsibility back on them and you cannot expect to have a following of tens or hundreds of thousands and hold no liability for misinformation (and I'd actually love EG to be looked into legally RE: The Cancer Act).
They're holding up a band 5 'bank' nurse from the tiny place that is Oban as an amazing source today! In the politest possible way, nurses have skill sets and knowledge in various areas, but a band 5 is definitely not an infectious disease specialist nurse, virologist, etc.
I wouldn't be surprised if she has seen some closed wards and a lot of empty beds, the argument was never that hospitals have absolutely no beds left. The aim was to stop it ever getting to that point. The issue was with ICU beds and most hospitals having to increase capacity there by creating icu beds that didn't exist, and the problem isn't physical beds, but the nursing staff available to do what is an extremely skilled job that not all nurses can do. It was about not completely filling wards to the point there are no beds at the risk of increasing covid admissions, but also trying to keep areas safe for patients admitted acutely unwell, needing urgent surgery or been involved in trauma. You need to try as hard as possible to make sure that in-hospital transmission is as low as possible and that involves having empty beds. They shout about cancer care, etc. well for the surgeries to continue that were necessary you need to know there are safe places to send them back to! You cannot have someone go through hours and hours of surgery with no critical care bed to go back to, or at least a ward bed that you know any potential positive case can be managed with and isolated quickly. You cannot risk having wards filled with immunocompromised patients in if not seriously ill, so a lot of their treatment was having to be managed in other ways.
I had an investigation done a few weeks back that I was admitted for the day before last time a couple years ago. This time I was advised to do as much as possible myself at home prior (my background allows for that, but assume to varying degrees that is how other patients are being managed too). My elective surgery that was going to be done last March has still never been rescheduled (again would have had stays in hospital), so empty beds. Patients that may have been admitted overnight for results from A&E, etc. are being sent home if stable enough with advice to return if there are problems. Patients that may have been admitted for a few days of IV antibiotics for infections, if well enough, aren't being kept in but accessing nursing service at home or coming back for an hr or 2 a day to day units.
So it was never about wards and beds being full, but making sure hospitals could cope with critical care surges (and then the step down of these patients!), and not being able to safely have these patients mix with their typical patient-types, nor managing to have the capacity to deal with COVID alongside ALL normal activities. The NHS didn't close as many services down this time, I've had a lot of out patients stuff done in the last few months that were cancelled during the initial lockdown, but they have a responsibility to manage patients not catching infections. This lot would be the first to shout if a relative was in hospital and caught and became ill with c.diff, MRSA, Flu, norovirus, etc. and not managing infection transmission between patients in hospitals ends up with fines and potentially lawsuits.
All I can say is I hope this lot are happy to give up their NMC numbers too. I really want the NMC to take a dim view of the nurses that are shouting about vaccine toxins and face coverings but are about to return to wearing masks to literally inject toxins under the guise of 'aesthetics'.
But then they hold up people considered to be knowledgeable and respectable, and it does worry me. I feel like they should be held legally liable should anyone found to follow them die as a result of poor decisions or misinformation made by 'influencers'. They are out there bleating about the vaccine companies not being held liable, but don't have any problem saying what they want. Want the government sued for their public health media campaigns, etc. yet probably wouldn't want legal responsibility back on them and you cannot expect to have a following of tens or hundreds of thousands and hold no liability for misinformation (and I'd actually love EG to be looked into legally RE: The Cancer Act).
They're holding up a band 5 'bank' nurse from the tiny place that is Oban as an amazing source today! In the politest possible way, nurses have skill sets and knowledge in various areas, but a band 5 is definitely not an infectious disease specialist nurse, virologist, etc.
I wouldn't be surprised if she has seen some closed wards and a lot of empty beds, the argument was never that hospitals have absolutely no beds left. The aim was to stop it ever getting to that point. The issue was with ICU beds and most hospitals having to increase capacity there by creating icu beds that didn't exist, and the problem isn't physical beds, but the nursing staff available to do what is an extremely skilled job that not all nurses can do. It was about not completely filling wards to the point there are no beds at the risk of increasing covid admissions, but also trying to keep areas safe for patients admitted acutely unwell, needing urgent surgery or been involved in trauma. You need to try as hard as possible to make sure that in-hospital transmission is as low as possible and that involves having empty beds. They shout about cancer care, etc. well for the surgeries to continue that were necessary you need to know there are safe places to send them back to! You cannot have someone go through hours and hours of surgery with no critical care bed to go back to, or at least a ward bed that you know any potential positive case can be managed with and isolated quickly. You cannot risk having wards filled with immunocompromised patients in if not seriously ill, so a lot of their treatment was having to be managed in other ways.
I had an investigation done a few weeks back that I was admitted for the day before last time a couple years ago. This time I was advised to do as much as possible myself at home prior (my background allows for that, but assume to varying degrees that is how other patients are being managed too). My elective surgery that was going to be done last March has still never been rescheduled (again would have had stays in hospital), so empty beds. Patients that may have been admitted overnight for results from A&E, etc. are being sent home if stable enough with advice to return if there are problems. Patients that may have been admitted for a few days of IV antibiotics for infections, if well enough, aren't being kept in but accessing nursing service at home or coming back for an hr or 2 a day to day units.
So it was never about wards and beds being full, but making sure hospitals could cope with critical care surges (and then the step down of these patients!), and not being able to safely have these patients mix with their typical patient-types, nor managing to have the capacity to deal with COVID alongside ALL normal activities. The NHS didn't close as many services down this time, I've had a lot of out patients stuff done in the last few months that were cancelled during the initial lockdown, but they have a responsibility to manage patients not catching infections. This lot would be the first to shout if a relative was in hospital and caught and became ill with c.diff, MRSA, Flu, norovirus, etc. and not managing infection transmission between patients in hospitals ends up with fines and potentially lawsuits.
All I can say is I hope this lot are happy to give up their NMC numbers too. I really want the NMC to take a dim view of the nurses that are shouting about vaccine toxins and face coverings but are about to return to wearing masks to literally inject toxins under the guise of 'aesthetics'.
Im thinking she may say it's instagram.
then just use the new page she's set up, start again and move away from the conspiracy, glo & lawyer claims and sell her yummy mummy vitamins.
Can’t wait for the new lie she’s concocting!Some great points here - oneI just need to stop thinking at the risk of 'free thinking', but this morning I was sitting just trying to work out some of their logic! Probably been discussed before, but I was trying to work out what they are actually thinking as they have to realise what they are spouting is contradicting their own arguments regularly.
Firstly we have the idea that the whole thing is a Population Cull...why did we bother locking down? Why are we shielding the vulnerable, etc. If there was a genuine population cull you'd keep it secret, keep the majority of people mixing other than your select few, and I'm pretty sure that in that scenario shielding the vulnerable is a bad idea as obviously they would be most easy to kill off, and probably more expendable (and expensive to have live) to whoever is coordinating it. I apologise if any of that sounds a bit blunt, but thinking about it logically and with numbers rather than emotions and humanity. So why are we working hard to stop people mixing as that goes against any cull.
Vaccines - chips? Well not being funny but why are they starting with 90 year old Doris that sits in the same seat most days (and again because of the cull suggestions it makes no sense to vaccinate the vulnerable first, surely the people behind it would decide other than their own mums they'd just expend the rest!)? Oh, and they want to kill fertility...again why are they wasting them on Doris first then? They'd have been best getting the kids, teens and 20-30s first rather than last. In fact they still haven't said whether all teens will be vaccinated...so why are we trying to stop everyone being fertile but starting at the wrong end of age spectrum?! Also, let's be honest, we've seen the outcomes of incest and genetic disorders that come from essentially 'inbreeding'. Anyone organising this would be stupid as affecting everyone's fertility but a few would ultimately even wipe their own gene lines out as they breed more and more genetic issues within a few generations! There are probably easier and cheaper ways of doing it that doesn't involve paying masses of doctors and nurses to inject millions of post-menopausal women first. If they wanted to go down that route they could have easily "created a fake disease" that affected people in their child bearing years or earlier.
And, if any of this was to be believed by the sane, surely you'd realise that the fact you are spreading information about rallies and protests on social media and info that Bill Gates can probably access easier and quicker than waiting for younger age groups to receive 'chips', if they really wanted to cull or cause infertility, they would be able to turn up at these events and use various agents to cull or cause infertility. The money and right people would likely be able to arrange things like that if any of it was plausible as seemingly this is all about 'money and the few elite'. And surely this 'free thinking' lot would be seen as the problem and be the first! I just don't understand the thinking behind any of it and why not one of them can actually take a step back and realise that absolutely nothing they are talking about makes any sense and that there are likely much easier ways to go about the whole thing than staging a global pandemic!
Yes there are a lot of mistakes being made and a lot of money involved, but in any crisis let's be honest there are going to be people that profit off of anything! Do we bad mouth funeral directors for taking money and profit in that scenario? Do we have a go at Birds Eye or farmers for daring trying to make a profit off of an essential need to eat? Should the gyms that typically make a profit be allowed to open after all of this, as how dare they? What about those who have set up online mediation classes throughout this? Or those trying to sell 'natural' skin care? No one should ever be allowed to make a profit EVER as obviously they must be involved in some sort of evil
All my spot on. I’ve asked some of them, to explain why, never get any kind of an answer that would hold water. It ranges from ‘they’ want to control us (still unsure who they are); ‘they’ want to watch us (again, who - but if you’ve nothing to hide, why the duck do you mind anyone looking at you? And in any event, we are one of THE most watched countries in the world - you’re likely to be caught on film at least twenty times before you get to work!!)
Then there is ‘they’ want everyone on Universal Credit! Stop it, you dick heads. As IF any government would want a nation completely dependant on welfare state payments - how bleeping stupid.
And then of course, ‘they’ want to sterilise us all, and so it goes on. All bollocks of course, and nothing that you could actually believe.
As for pharma, I’ve heard it all before - there’s already a cure for cancer. Don’t be bleeping silly. How many millions of people in the world work in pharma? How many of them have family members who have cancer? How many of THEM will be diagnosed? As if they’d be ‘in on it’. There’s no denying that pharma is massive when it comes to money, some of the drug treatments that NICE is asked to approve, absolutely eye watering, but we tend to forget the years of R&D and the drugs that never even get from bench to bedside.
These people are dangerous fuckwits............ and cunts, of course.
Well, she can try......... but we’ll be here, holding her accountable. Liey, I’ve never been one to back down from a fight, and I don’t plan to start now. You will have to deal with some of the tit that you’ve spouted, sooner or later.
- Status