I think I might know what he is doing with all these police and ofcom reports etc. when I worked for the council a few years ago, we had cases of people who do things that needed enforcement action (rouge landlords, planning and environmental breaches etc)…occasionally one of those ‘customers’ would become extremely vexatious.
they would do things such as make multiple unsubstantiated complaints against their neighbours, make formal complaints about staff over minor or lies, constantly phone admin teams and refuse to get off the phone, demand only to talk to the top brass, make social media posts aimed at specific staff members and publish staff names online, turn up at public meetings that they had no reason what to be involved in, write letters that don’t make sense but quote lots of legal jargon, threaten legal action, make lots of formal complaints and threaten to take it to the ombudsman, make numerous freedom of information requests etc.
Basically stress out the staff and waste their time as much as possible, so that even though the ‘customer’ was in the wrong and facing enforcement action…all of the careful tiptoeing around had to be done by the staff.
I think Jimmy is doing the same thing. If he gets arrested for anything…he will immediately be asking the police about the ‘investigation’ into the hundreds of ‘crimes’ he has reported against himself. He will use it as a reason not to cooperate or admit any fault, any wrongdoing proven will be backpedaled by him claiming he was reacting to the ‘trolling’ or whatever illegal activity he is claiming others are doing to him. He will claim he is in firefighter mode and not responsible for his reactions.
The police won’t want to arrest him, they won’t want to deal with him because he will be a difficult customer. He’s not likely to go ‘no comment’ and let the relevant facts air at a trial, he’ll want to bring in every irrelevant thing possible then complain about his local police to the complaints commission. He will try the tactic of trying to scare them off dealing with him.
When the bbc investigative journalist turned up at his office, he agreed to be interviewed without any pre-arrangement. It’s OBVIOUS that wasn’t going to be good for him, his lies have been persistently pointed out to him on social media, he knew what was coming. Any normal scammer would make the journalist come back for an appointment and consider tactics on how to handle it. He’s accepted the interview intentionally because he knew that afterwards he could claim to be the victim, that the bbc had him in a corner etc and he didn’t have time to research all the things they accused him of before responding.
He’s immediately decided that instead of the bbc being correct about him (a lot of the wrongdoing he actually admitted to in the interview), that they are wrong and now he will be insulting their integrity and complaining multiple times to ofcom. He’s trying to scare the bbc via bloating the complaints system into not doing any further reporting on him. It’s an obvious tactic.
90 KB
129.1 KB
I misread and thought they'd found the tweet with the actual noose photo, that's the one I was on the hunt for and didn't make it into Wayback
