Why has he just put the pic of him and this random man there
Depher/CPH CIC #3 No nervous breakdown, I’m good, honest.
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Depher Threads
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Maybe he's going to start doing inspirational posters to sell in the new shop?Why has he just put the pic of him and this random man there
Mm this one possibly needs a little work. What does it actually mean? Something about pain I guess.
Is this a riddle x
Not quite as impactful as 'first they came'
All I know is this man is an almighty pain in the butt.
or 'shut up you fooking m**g' as he so very recently posted on his public business / cic / fake charity account.
Since he's asking and reading these threads, here's some answers to Jimmy's existential questions.
1. Are we needed ?? Or are we not needed ??
There's plenty of established evidence of increasing rates of poverty across the country. A related problem is the poor state of much of the country's housing stock which is not fit for purpose and will increasingly not meet the needs of a warming climate. There is a need to address structural and systemic poverty AND to find ways to both address the high costs of home energy use and ensure that Britain's homes are better insulated and energy efficient. We know all this.
There are some measures already in place to help people on low incomes access new boilers through government grants. DEPHER could be helping local people access these grants if it developed the right expertise to do so.
Additionally, there probably IS a need for low-cost heating engineers who can go into homes and conduct repairs and install new appliances.
DEPHER could establish a partnership with the local council or any number of existing charities to put such a programme in place. The energy companies all have corporate social responsibility programmes that could be worked with. Burnley could become a pilot programme to test efficacy and then it could be rolled out further. You would start small and actively track needs and impact over a period of time with rigorous reporting and evidence.
However, this would need skilled management, financial transparency and an ability to negotiate partnerships with the public sector, and the corporate and non-governmental sectors. The DEPHER CIC business model is not ever going to be able to address all these deep-rooted issues and no amount of relaunching and GoFundMe efforts will do it.
So, here's a question back at you, James: does DEPHER actually have any of these skills or abilities and do you have any clear-sighted plans to work with the sorts of experts who could help develop such important work?
2. Shall we continue or shall we just say goodbye and ignore the true suffering and poverty in your community
This is an overly emotional and manipulative question which is designed to make us think that DEPHER is the only solution to a widespread, systemic set of societal and economic problems.
No, you should not continue. You are not qualified to run a complex operation that addressing this need requires. You have repeatedly demonstrated a cavalier disregard for the privacy of your clients and you have lied and blurred the truth about both the work you do and the fundraising you undertake to do it.
You were able to exploit the goodwill of the public who agree that there are huge problems relating to poverty and who fervently hope somebody will do something about it. Unfortunately, this very challenging reality cannot be improved by individuals contributing small amounts of money to online fundraisers. You have shown us time and again that you cannot be trusted to be a good and proper steward of other people's money.
"Saying goodbye" does not mean ignoring poverty. It means taking a dishonest and manipulative person like yourself out of the picture before you do any more harm.
Here's another question for you: have you ever considered that you might be doing more harm than good?
3. Does it come to that point of saying " enough " when the truth is suppressed by the lies of ignorance and jealousy, sparked by the motive of personal grudges and manipulation of what is real. When others attack the good, but also the recipients of that good, to cause damage and hurt to those they do not yet know or never will. How do we deal with what society now calls the normal, but it is the cause of so much hatred, do we ignore and accept, do we lie down and allow the truth to be hidden and the kindness to be destroyed, or do we fight for the rights of each other. When humanity loses its humanity, we know we are lost forever, and it is only a matter of time until we know it will reach us all, regardless of the king or president, we are all human, we have the same genetic makeup as each other. We feel the same pain. We see the same pain We speak the same pain We ignore the same pain While others die from the pain we created, and we ignore it, the pain because at this moment in time, it doesn't affect us.
This isn't a question but it's more of the same manipulative bullshit that you peddle as your modus operandi James.
If you really believe criticisms of DEPHER are due to jealousy and a willful intent to destroy someone's good work, you are showing us that you do not possess the emotional intelligence to lead an organisation working with large amounts of money and with vulnerable people.
There is absolutely no evidence that any of the critics are competitors who are trying to steal DEPHER's work from under you.
Nobody is undermining the values of kindness or seeking to destroy anybody's rights.
Instead, there is a consistent examination of the ways in which DEPHER breaks all codes of professional conduct, exploits the genuine suffering of vulnerable people to extort money from empathetic members of the public, and does not even manage to fulfill its basic mandate to offer competent heating and plumbing works.
Instead of losing our humanity, your critics are displaying humanity by keeping a watchful eye on your shoddy workmanship, your disregard for the law, your constant, patronising breaches of people's privacy and your bleeping dodgy financial management. We are concerned that DEPHER is harming people who are already vulnerable to predators and the effects of poverty, ill health and old age -- by giving our time voluntarily to hold you to account, without any benefit to ourselves, we hope to put a halt to your crimes.
Here's a last question for you, James: If you spent some time considering your motives, would you honestly be able to say that you are driven by a concern for humanity or are you using the cloak of benevolence to create wealth for yourself and your extended family, while also getting a big ego boost from being a well-known man who dispenses philanthropy to the poor and needy?
Over to you, James. Looking forward to seeing what you come up with next. All indications are that you've screwed up your social media platforms by repeatedly closing and re-opening your social media accounts -- a very stupid move, especially as more people are awakened to the proliferation of online grifting. You won't be able to raise huge amounts of cash without any accountability again.
1. Are we needed ?? Or are we not needed ??
There's plenty of established evidence of increasing rates of poverty across the country. A related problem is the poor state of much of the country's housing stock which is not fit for purpose and will increasingly not meet the needs of a warming climate. There is a need to address structural and systemic poverty AND to find ways to both address the high costs of home energy use and ensure that Britain's homes are better insulated and energy efficient. We know all this.
There are some measures already in place to help people on low incomes access new boilers through government grants. DEPHER could be helping local people access these grants if it developed the right expertise to do so.
Additionally, there probably IS a need for low-cost heating engineers who can go into homes and conduct repairs and install new appliances.
DEPHER could establish a partnership with the local council or any number of existing charities to put such a programme in place. The energy companies all have corporate social responsibility programmes that could be worked with. Burnley could become a pilot programme to test efficacy and then it could be rolled out further. You would start small and actively track needs and impact over a period of time with rigorous reporting and evidence.
However, this would need skilled management, financial transparency and an ability to negotiate partnerships with the public sector, and the corporate and non-governmental sectors. The DEPHER CIC business model is not ever going to be able to address all these deep-rooted issues and no amount of relaunching and GoFundMe efforts will do it.
So, here's a question back at you, James: does DEPHER actually have any of these skills or abilities and do you have any clear-sighted plans to work with the sorts of experts who could help develop such important work?
2. Shall we continue or shall we just say goodbye and ignore the true suffering and poverty in your community
This is an overly emotional and manipulative question which is designed to make us think that DEPHER is the only solution to a widespread, systemic set of societal and economic problems.
No, you should not continue. You are not qualified to run a complex operation that addressing this need requires. You have repeatedly demonstrated a cavalier disregard for the privacy of your clients and you have lied and blurred the truth about both the work you do and the fundraising you undertake to do it.
You were able to exploit the goodwill of the public who agree that there are huge problems relating to poverty and who fervently hope somebody will do something about it. Unfortunately, this very challenging reality cannot be improved by individuals contributing small amounts of money to online fundraisers. You have shown us time and again that you cannot be trusted to be a good and proper steward of other people's money.
"Saying goodbye" does not mean ignoring poverty. It means taking a dishonest and manipulative person like yourself out of the picture before you do any more harm.
Here's another question for you: have you ever considered that you might be doing more harm than good?
3. Does it come to that point of saying " enough " when the truth is suppressed by the lies of ignorance and jealousy, sparked by the motive of personal grudges and manipulation of what is real. When others attack the good, but also the recipients of that good, to cause damage and hurt to those they do not yet know or never will. How do we deal with what society now calls the normal, but it is the cause of so much hatred, do we ignore and accept, do we lie down and allow the truth to be hidden and the kindness to be destroyed, or do we fight for the rights of each other. When humanity loses its humanity, we know we are lost forever, and it is only a matter of time until we know it will reach us all, regardless of the king or president, we are all human, we have the same genetic makeup as each other. We feel the same pain. We see the same pain We speak the same pain We ignore the same pain While others die from the pain we created, and we ignore it, the pain because at this moment in time, it doesn't affect us.
This isn't a question but it's more of the same manipulative bullshit that you peddle as your modus operandi James.
If you really believe criticisms of DEPHER are due to jealousy and a willful intent to destroy someone's good work, you are showing us that you do not possess the emotional intelligence to lead an organisation working with large amounts of money and with vulnerable people.
There is absolutely no evidence that any of the critics are competitors who are trying to steal DEPHER's work from under you.
Nobody is undermining the values of kindness or seeking to destroy anybody's rights.
Instead, there is a consistent examination of the ways in which DEPHER breaks all codes of professional conduct, exploits the genuine suffering of vulnerable people to extort money from empathetic members of the public, and does not even manage to fulfill its basic mandate to offer competent heating and plumbing works.
Instead of losing our humanity, your critics are displaying humanity by keeping a watchful eye on your shoddy workmanship, your disregard for the law, your constant, patronising breaches of people's privacy and your bleeping dodgy financial management. We are concerned that DEPHER is harming people who are already vulnerable to predators and the effects of poverty, ill health and old age -- by giving our time voluntarily to hold you to account, without any benefit to ourselves, we hope to put a halt to your crimes.
Here's a last question for you, James: If you spent some time considering your motives, would you honestly be able to say that you are driven by a concern for humanity or are you using the cloak of benevolence to create wealth for yourself and your extended family, while also getting a big ego boost from being a well-known man who dispenses philanthropy to the poor and needy?
Over to you, James. Looking forward to seeing what you come up with next. All indications are that you've screwed up your social media platforms by repeatedly closing and re-opening your social media accounts -- a very stupid move, especially as more people are awakened to the proliferation of online grifting. You won't be able to raise huge amounts of cash without any accountability again.
He's right about the pain of reading his shite.
Let's not, James
Let's not, James
The first sentence of his reminded me of one of those spammy "This puppy is sad because nobody wish him a happy birthday 
" posts you get on Facebook that all the dafties reply to. He needs to get a grip and stop being manipulative.
" posts you get on Facebook that all the dafties reply to. He needs to get a grip and stop being manipulative.Share this post if you want this dying man toThe first sentence of his reminded me of one of those spammy "This puppy is sad because nobody wish him a happy birthday
Ignore = you don't care
The clue was “A place in the sun” which you thought might be the holiday. Well the sun is hot, another thing that’s hot might be a gas boiler, a place might be a house or even a shop, yes you’ve won a conbola ticket for a load of knackered old boiler parts!
What d’you mean you’d rather have the bin?
Jimmy's problem (one of many) is that he is obviously deeply thick. And when he tries to sound profound and intelligent it just emphasises the thickness.
Same also applies to his being 'caring'. I genuinely don't think he is at all. So it always comes across as insincere and disingenuous.
Apart from that carry on Jim
Same also applies to his being 'caring'. I genuinely don't think he is at all. So it always comes across as insincere and disingenuous.
Apart from that carry on Jim
Ah that's kind. Jimmy training one of life's unfortunates.
Must be a complete and utter coincidence that this person is his brother in law and also tenant of the 'investment' house.
Funny he doesn't mention it though
(And why when I read what he writes it is always in Jim Bowen's Bullseye voice).
(Thanks to twitter sleuths for finding this).
Must be a complete and utter coincidence that this person is his brother in law and also tenant of the 'investment' house.
Funny he doesn't mention it though
(And why when I read what he writes it is always in Jim Bowen's Bullseye voice).
(Thanks to twitter sleuths for finding this).
Oh great, now there are two of them. Clint and "CLINT".
What a day for kerning.
poor Clint, he's not a Mr like Mr KhanAh that's kind. Jimmy training one of life's unfortunates.
Must be a complete and utter coincidence that this person is his brother in law and also tenant of the 'investment' house.
Funny he doesn't mention it though
(And why when I read what he writes it is always in Jim Bowen's Bullseye voice).
View attachment 2842177
(Thanks to twitter sleuths for finding this).
- Status