Dan Wheeler #21 Wheelie Bin & the Temple of Turnips

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Best idea to not go on his socials it will only make you feel worse, its a 'rabbit hole' of fuckery- always good for your mental health to have a break from the overwhelm of Social media too.

It's so confusing to me that she is a midwife, I would have thought that would have made her 'ultra' sensitive to these types of issues and the safeguarding of women, especially young girls.
He cant get away with it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
" we have plenty of fanny" with the context that is so important to Danny!

They were talking about " sausages" in the academy, which would lead anyone to believe they were talking about men. They listed some of the " sausages" and this led to Danny telling us all what the academy had plenty of.

You can see and hear it in the clip I edited to see the context of the comments shown in the transcript.

Paying members are now objectified by Danny as a laugh. In my opinion, the tone and the context made members both objects and sources of low brow comedy.

If I were a member of any organisation, club or institution that described me or members in that way, I would leave.

Abusing the " flock" is a standard approach for wannabee cult leaders, testing the water to see what will be tolerated. Jim Jones the "kool aid" Jonestown guy, used to wake his followers up in the middle of the night to abuse them for hours on end. Danny just shows his contempt now and again with the odd quip on a live. I guess he is not getting up at 4am to do a Jim Jones!

Charles (Maddox) Manson would embed ideas in his follower's minds and Danny has blatantly told his followers that they are just " fanny". If no one left the academy yesterday then he got away with it, and I guess will push it further as the days go on. Danny finished up his live yesterday offering 30 minutes of phone sex to anyone that joined, adding a laugh at the end of the sentence just to claim it was a joke if ever challenged.

Busy day for Danny on February 15th 2021 . All recorded and transcribed.
Sexual chat in front of a minor, including asking her inappropriate questions about Paull Hollywood, egged on by Kaz
Encouraging Kaz to tell anecdotes about oral sex in front of a minor
Allowing Kaz to tell sexual anecdotes about her mate and oral sex
Calling a minor ( his partners daughter ) a " bikey" as her dad looks like a thief in his opinion. How does dad feel about this?
Calling academy members "sausages" and " fanny". Full-on objectification
Offering phone/video sex to new members. But he did laugh straight afterwards so that makes it okay!?
Giving a minor a defence spray, which if it is not just spray dye is an offensive weapon, liable for criminal prosecution
Encouraging a minor to carry a knife and offering to source one. To be used defensively when out and about.

All recorded, no exaggeration needed. All very, very sad.
I listened to this video and I'm sure he says "plenty of ham in there" rather than "fanny" still wrong on both accounts by a mile but I am sure he said in reference to the sausage meaning men he said "ham in there" meaning woman, said fast it does sound like "fanny" I must admit. Maybe I'm wrong.

Dan Wheeler has not gained 8 stone (50kg) in muscle.
Just for reference.
Here is a picture of 6 x Mr Olympia Dorian Yates (Biggest bodybuilding title you can win)
in this picture he is 118-120kg. (Same weight as DW)
Dan Wheeler looks nothing like this.
If Dan Wheeler had put 8 stone of muscle on, he’d be Mr Olympia worthy Contestant
Dan Wheelers weight gain a vast majority will be fat.
Yes muscle too, but mostly fat.
your welcome
Exactly. Thanks for the photo to show what it would look like. I just don't understand how he can shamedly say he lost 8 stone but kept off, he just hasn't. It makes, me so angry his constant lies
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
No doubt he will go live as usual this morning like nothing has happened. Thank god it’s that lass’ half term when all this awfulness has happened
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
No doubt he will go live as usual this morning like nothing has happened. Thank god it’s that lass’ half term when all this awfulness has happened
Your user pic *deceased*

Unfortunately I too think he will just keep going with no serious repercussions. That girl is in a horrible environment with a disgusting perv and a mum who just lets him walk all over her. It's a bad situation, but won't change unless something extreme happens...and I have the feeling Whanker is too sly to go far enough to actually trip that alarm. But if Sam is telling herself it's OK, because it's just words/jokes, then she's bleeping deluded - her daughter will either enter the adult world thinking it's acceptable to be treated and spoken to in that way, or will be smart enough when she's older to look back and see what a horrible situation her own mother allowed her to grow up in. Neither are good, both have lasting damage.

At least he's damaging his business with this behaviour, but for me (and I know for the rest of you) that is small consolation when it's at the cost of a child's wellbeing.



And if Sam or anyone else tries to justify this as being "open and honest" about sex with their kids so they feel they can always talk to them about things...no, just no.

I have always been open about sex and sexuality with my kids. Age appropriate, informative, and without shame. There is a huge difference between being approachable and teaching your child how to navigate sexual relationships safely, healthily and with respect/consent, and being a huge sleaze who gets off on making a child feel uncomfortable or sexualising a minor.


Appropriate conversation: trusted parent having a balanced and private conversation about the skewed reality of porn, and how to respect yourself enough not to do anything you are uncomfortable with.

Inappropriate conversation: mum's pervy boyfriend using the power imbalance to ask, in front of an audience of strangers and left publicly available for the world to see, whether a child would want to perform a graphic sex act on a man old enough to be her grandad.

Notice the difference, Sam? Hardly subtle, is it...?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21
Your user pic *deceased*

Unfortunately I too think he will just keep going with no serious repercussions. That girl is in a horrible environment with a disgusting perv and a mum who just lets him walk all over her. It's a bad situation, but won't change unless something extreme happens...and I have the feeling Whanker is too sly to go far enough to actually trip that alarm. But if Sam is telling herself it's OK, because it's just words/jokes, then she's bleeping deluded - her daughter will either enter the adult world thinking it's acceptable to be treated and spoken to in that way, or will be smart enough when she's older to look back and see what a horrible situation her own mother allowed her to grow up in. Neither are good, both have lasting damage.

At least he's damaging his business with this behaviour, but for me (and I know for the rest of you) that is small consolation when it's at the cost of a child's wellbeing.



And if Sam or anyone else tries to justify this as being "open and honest" about sex with their kids so they feel they can always talk to them about things...no, just no.

I have always been open about sex and sexuality with my kids. Age appropriate, informative, and without shame. There is a huge difference between being approachable and teaching your child how to navigate sexual relationships safely, healthily and with respect/consent, and being a huge sleaze who gets off on making a child feel uncomfortable or sexualising a minor.


Appropriate conversation: trusted parent having a balanced and private conversation about the skewed reality of porn, and how to respect yourself enough not to do anything you are uncomfortable with.

Inappropriate conversation: mum's pervy boyfriend using the power imbalance to ask, in front of an audience of strangers and left publicly available for the world to see, whether a child would want to perform a graphic sex act on a man old enough to be her grandad.

Notice the difference, Sam? Hardly subtle, is it...?
Exactly all of this. I am still shocked that at least 3 adults were party to this and no one can see an issue. I would be intrigued to know what some of the hangers on think, the Steves and Sully for example or would they really put this down to “bants” or an “accident”, “he didn’t mean it”. I wonder what their partners would think. I’m struggling to get how anyone else thinks it’s ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Surely none of his followers who adore him can think that is OK what he said to that girl and just the things he continues to say sexually. I couid hear I think it was Sam say in the background to him about always taking it too far while he was saying "what? what?" laughing just after he said the sit on his face thing Re that celebrity so I bet they had words after it or I would like to think they did.. Kaz on the other hand I can only assume she doesn't want to be with her husband at all because why else would you stay away from your kids and husband to play pretend news reporter with a sexual predator and if what is true about her hosting adults with learning difficulties and she thinks that kind of talk and behaviour towards a minor is funny and OK in front of adults too (how humiliating) then surely she could get herself in trouble by association if social services found out.

Exactly all of this. I am still shocked that at least 3 adults were party to this and no one can see an issue. I would be intrigued to know what some of the hangers on think, the Steves and Sully for example or would they really put this down to “bants” or an “accident”, “he didn’t mean it”. I wonder what their partners would think. I’m struggling to get how anyone else thinks it’s ok.
no
Me too, I can't believe he actually said that to a school child. Asking a minor if she would do a sexual act on an adult. Can this be reported to the police?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 11
He just came up on my fyp replying to a woman who said live with a kid with adhd and come back to me and he got all on his high horse about how he has lived with a child with adhd for 36 years, himself. First off, has he ACTUALLY been diagnosed with adhd or is that something Dr Dan has diagnosed himself with? Secondly, having adhd (he probably doesn't) and living with someone with adhd is two different things. Both challenging but very different experiences. Lastly, what's with his obsession with experience. Yes, experience is valuable but to say, even if your kid is 5, I have 31 more years of experience of adhd than you, is so crappy.

Despite your own belief Danny, experience isn't the ultimate and only way to learn. Each individual with adhd is different, your experience with it (although questionable) is different to the next. Also, people who are actual professionals, who went to university, did multiple placements, did actual research (not a quick google and found an article from 2007) worked for years in the field of neurodevelopment, probably have personal experience too, THEY KNOW MORE THAN YOU!!

My son has asd and a speech disorder, I also have siblings with adhd and asd which I grew up with. I have my experiences with it but I do not know everything about them, nor would I ever claim to. This lady who you replied to is correct, adhd is much more than too many e numbers and if you're going to be a clever clogs and pull out (google) some research to back up your claim, make sure its relevant, reliable and recent. You're a doughball dude

Also, edited to add, I have an undergrad degree and a masters degree and I had to be able to correctly research, read and understand research in my field. If you are going to pull a research paper out, make sure you know how to actually interpret said paper and btw, 300 participants isn't a big study and it was from 15 years ago and so much can change in that time. Look what researchers have done and what hypothesis are supported in the last 5 years so your argument is a bit more sound. This is why your magical experience isn't the be all, university is important and valuable too as they teach you how to properly locate, understand and summarise research to strengthen your argument.

This has really annoyed me for some reason, he is so dangerous with this advice! I had to comment today on one of his videos. The guy is utterly delusional 😳

Also added another screenshot of hyperactivity and e numbers from the NHS website. Very different advice from Mr Wheeler. Also, it says to seek advice from a medical professional before drastically changing their diet which, correct me if I'm wrong, Dan is definitely not a medical professional or any sort of professional actually!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 18
He's determined that "experience" is the be all and end all.

Of course experience informs and influences practice. But on its own it's actually pretty worthless.

Why? Because you need qualifications to be able to differentiate good experience from bad. Because you need qualifications to understand the areas that you haven't had the chance to experience, in order that there aren't gaps in your knowledge. You need qualifications to identify when your experience is appropriate and applicable, and when it is not.

Back to midwifery. Who would you rather delivered your baby - a newly qualified practitioner who knows all the theory of the different issues that may come up during your labour and who has studied technique, protocols and when it is necessary to refer to other professionals, but for whom this is their first delivery as a qualified midwife. Or a woman who just happens to have experience of giving birth herself? Qualified trumps experience.

Strange Hill to chose to die on dude...
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
I listened to this video and I'm sure he says "plenty of ham in there" rather than "fanny" still wrong on both accounts by a mile but I am sure he said in reference to the sausage meaning men he said "ham in there" meaning woman, said fast it does sound like "fanny" I must admit. Maybe I'm wrong.


Exactly. Thanks for the photo to show what it would look like. I just don't understand how he can shamedly say he lost 8 stone but kept off, he just hasn't. It makes, me so angry his constant lies
Hi
I went back and listened again both on the original and the edit cut
At 2 hours 53 the conversation turns to " not much sausage..."
At 2 :53 :25 he says it and one second later Kaz turns to her left and puts her head in her hands. That might not be the reaction you would get from saying " ham in there". Kaz puts her head down, and after the huge exhale from Dan you hear from Kaz " that's awful".

I edited the footage and maxed out the voice for volume and clarity. I had never heard " that's awful " before. Unlike Danny, if I get something wrong I am going to check. It is a small file now, have a listen. I have an ear syringe appointment on standby in town! :)

I must buy Danny a better microphone, it will save me time in the long run!
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
So this morning I caught some conversation and a photo of a vagina. They were discussing where a womans pee pee hole is. 🙈
 
  • Wow
  • Sick
  • Like
Reactions: 19
So this morning I caught some conversation and a photo of a vagina. They were discussing where a womans pee pee hole is. 🙈
His perverse sex obsession is becoming ever more apparent. Dan has always been a bit slimy (recall him being kicked out of the gym for inappropriate behavior toward female customers), but lately has taken it to a new level. He can’t go more than a few minutes without making some kind of off-color remark, and they’re not even funny.

There were all of three viewers on YouTube; I assume similar participation across “all his platforms”?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
So this morning I caught some conversation and a photo of a vagina. They were discussing where a womans pee pee hole is. 🙈
OMG I must get my eyes checked I thought your monkey emoji was one a person with their trousers down showing their bum.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 13
So this morning I caught some conversation and a photo of a vagina. They were discussing where a womans pee pee hole is. 🙈
Appropriate content as always!

It's one thing to talk about this sort of thing in an educational way, but to be able to do that you have to have actual knowledge on the subject. I'd bet my life's savings that there was zero educational content during that conversation and it was just filled with disgusting "jokes" and crude remarks
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Appropriate content as always!

It's one thing to talk about this sort of thing in an educational way, but to be able to do that you have to have actual knowledge on the subject. I'd bet my life's savings that there was zero educational content during that conversation and it was just filled with disgusting "jokes" and crude remarks
Agreed. Whanker doesnt strike me as the type who knows his way around a woman. More an "any hole's a goal" type.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 13
Rant incoming... Sean! Sean! What on earth!? Ok so theres no way hes getting paid because the income of the business isnt enough to cover costs never mind salaries. Now I am all for equality - and theres loads of women who dont work as their partners may work and they like keeping home! To each their own etc... But.. Sean isn't doing childcare =- or even keeping house. Hes sat in his mates living room (I bet it stinks in there), pretending to be on Telly. Hes a grown man, who leaves his house every day to go to his mates and (BTW watching it now and they are streaming the TV which unless they have an entertainments license and are paying to do this they are breaking the law) sit on his sofa and talk drivel! Now like I said. To each their own. But is there anything less attractive than a man who doesn't want a job? A man who doesn't want to provide!? I mean I have literally dried up! My nether regions dry up looking at him with his reactor lenses on his pervy looking sunglasses, and his bad dress sense and just wonder what he thinks of himself when he looks in a mirror! He isn't even allowed in camera shot of this shitshow let alone doing anything else.. This Show is an example of watching what would happen if you left some 8-10 year olds in a room with some props... If Sean and Danny were the only men in the world left I would literally stitch myself up with razor wire rather than let them near me! Now as for her. She alone could do so much good for body positivity. Instead she chooses to lie about something whilst literally wearing the evidence to the contrary. Shes a disgrace. When she nods in the background agreeing with everything he says when its clearly wrong! Then him - Danny Boy! The true idiot at the centre of this who has never been diagnosed with anything at all! not even ADHD! The man is a really truly ill-educated incredibly stupid man! His only saving grace and why he still engages people is that he is manipulative! He doesn't know he is - if he did he would actually be successful. But he is thick! Thick as mince! Stupid! Aaand breath.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 17
He just came up on my fyp replying to a woman who said live with a kid with adhd and come back to me and he got all on his high horse about how he has lived with a child with adhd for 36 years, himself. First off, has he ACTUALLY been diagnosed with adhd or is that something Dr Dan has diagnosed himself with? Secondly, having adhd (he probably doesn't) and living with someone with adhd is two different things. Both challenging but very different experiences. Lastly, what's with his obsession with experience. Yes, experience is valuable but to say, even if your kid is 5, I have 31 more years of experience of adhd than you, is so crappy.

Despite your own belief Danny, experience isn't the ultimate and only way to learn. Each individual with adhd is different, your experience with it (although questionable) is different to the next. Also, people who are actual professionals, who went to university, did multiple placements, did actual research (not a quick google and found an article from 2007) worked for years in the field of neurodevelopment, probably have personal experience too, THEY KNOW MORE THAN YOU!!

My son has asd and a speech disorder, I also have siblings with adhd and asd which I grew up with. I have my experiences with it but I do not know everything about them, nor would I ever claim to. This lady who you replied to is correct, adhd is much more than too many e numbers and if you're going to be a clever clogs and pull out (google) some research to back up your claim, make sure its relevant, reliable and recent. You're a doughball dude

Also, edited to add, I have an undergrad degree and a masters degree and I had to be able to correctly research, read and understand research in my field. If you are going to pull a research paper out, make sure you know how to actually interpret said paper and btw, 300 participants isn't a big study and it was from 15 years ago and so much can change in that time. Look what researchers have done and what hypothesis are supported in the last 5 years so your argument is a bit more sound. This is why your magical experience isn't the be all, university is important and valuable too as they teach you how to properly locate, understand and summarise research to strengthen your argument.

This has really annoyed me for some reason, he is so dangerous with this advice! I had to comment today on one of his videos. The guy is utterly delusional 😳

Also added another screenshot of hyperactivity and e numbers from the NHS website. Very different advice from Mr Wheeler. Also, it says to seek advice from a medical professional before drastically changing their diet which, correct me if I'm wrong, Dan is definitely not a medical professional or any sort of professional actually!
He's done a couple of video replies to the negativity, snide & arrogant as usual. Really shows his true nature when he does this, keep up the good work Whanker! 😘

Dr Google failed him again eh? Not learnt anything from the previous times either, you think he'd keep away from posting ancient studies! 🤪

Alienating a lot of people going down this route on a highly emotive subject, even if he is the world's most knowledgable dick on ADHD (that he's never had a professional diagnosis on but it fits his narrative).

Are we getting to you Danny boy? Are we?? All your behaviour flung back at you. What a deeply unpleasant world you inhabit dude, all self made.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 11
He's done a couple of video replies to the negativity, snide & arrogant as usual. Really shows his true nature when he does this, keep up the good work Whanker! 😘

Dr Google failed him again eh? Not learnt anything from the previous times either, you think he'd keep away from posting ancient studies! 🤪

Alienating a lot of people going down this route on a highly emotive subject, even if he is the world's most knowledgable dick on ADHD (that he's never had a professional diagnosis on but it fits his narrative).

Are we getting to you Danny boy? Are we?? All your behaviour flung back at you. What a deeply unpleasant world you inhabit dude, all self made.
Yes!! It's nice to see we are getting to him 😌

Even the most knowledgeable and qualified professional on adhd would be open to new ideas, research and views. Not Danny boy, the experience he has is more valid and important than others. Even if he has no idea how to properly find, read and interpret reliable research and uses whatever the first page on Google has to offer that fits his narrative. And then he either makes smug, snide replies, like he knows what he's on about or deletes the comments 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.