Yes but he's quoting the docs from this legal public site this woman is trying to make it look like he's spreading misinformation when that's not the case he's taken it from a genuine site on the internet .Yes and the figures of adverse events/deaths mentioned would be from the vaccine rollout Dec 20-Feb 21.
I’ve read a bit regarding those docs and it isn’t as clear cut as just releasing hundreds of thousands of documents as there is personal information and data that would have to be omitted.
She was referring to the number of doses given out between Dec 2020-Feb 2021 which she found online as Dr John Campbell says we don’t know how many vaccines were given out.Yes but he's quoting the docs from this legal public site this woman is trying to make it look like he's spreading misinformation when that's not the case he's taken it from a genuine site on the internet .
How can we possibly know on a global scale when some countries don't even record or give people the correct vaccines ? even a tattle member was given a different vaccine to what was stated on record .She was referring to the number of doses given out between Dec 2020-Feb 2021 which she found online as Dr John Campbell says we don’t know how many vaccines were given out.
Her point was that we do know as each country has information of how many doses have been rolled out.
You can say the same for the adverse reactions/deaths Dr John Campbell mentions in that video. How can we possibly know when those figures have not been said to be 100% from the vaccines. Correlation does not imply causation.How can we possibly know on a global scale when some countries don't even record or give people the correct vaccines ? even a tattle member was given a different vaccine to what was stated on record .
You can have a look online to see how many doses were given worldwide between Dec 20 - Feb 21. They wouldn’t reveal personal data as that goes against confidentiality.Going in circles maybe if they didn't cover that we would know how many were given at the time the report was generated?
It's the selective redacted information I find concerning. Why can't the total number of serious and non serious cases for reproductive, congenital and endocrine issues be shown as there's no personal identifiable data there?
He didn’t say anything was caused by the vaccines he said associated too…same could be said for the whole pandemicYou can say the same for the adverse reactions/deaths Dr John Campbell mentions in that video. How can we possibly know when those figures have not been said to be 100% from the vaccines. Correlation does not imply causation.
That number might differ from the one produced by the actual company themselves.You can have a look online to see how many doses were given worldwide between Dec 20 - Feb 21. They wouldn’t reveal personal data as that goes against confidentiality.
That’s not what I said either.He didn’t say anything was caused by the vaccines he said associated too…same could be said for the whole pandemic
Links to sources over screenshots.I like reading information from all parties, may not agree but I like the balance.
I would say I prefer links to sources over screenshots.
Where is this from? What is it showing?
If you go back to the Dr John video where he mentions we don’t know the number of doses given between Dec 20 and Feb 21 because the number was redacted - he is not quite correct. If you see what he is pointing to on the Pfizer doc it says it is doses shipped. He further admits the documents are not easy to ready and hard to make sense of - so why make a video about it to interpret the data. This is how inaccuracy comes about when people are not 100% sure of how to interpret such data.It's from the same Pfizer post analysis report which Dr Cambell used, with the number of doses hidden.
Similarly the number of cases for the last group of conditions have not been shown.
Some would be okay with not being shown this, other not. Make your own interpretations.
Doses shipped are still not actual doses administered. How many were lost due to incorrect storage or expiry dates?If you go back to the Dr John video where he mentions we don’t know the number of doses given between Dec 20 and Feb 21 because the number was redacted - he is not quite correct. If you see what he is pointing to on the Pfizer doc it says it is doses shipped. He further admits the documents are not easy to ready and hard to make sense of - so why make a video about it to interpret the data. This is how inaccuracy comes about when people are not 100% sure of how to interpret such data.
The adverse reactions have been public knowledge on the VAERS/Yellow Card System and equivalent in the EU etc.
Yes I am well aware of that. The figure on the Pfizer doc Dr Campbell was referring to was doses shipped and he said we don’t know doses administered between Dec 20-Feb 21 when that is figure is actually available.Doses shipped are not actual doses administered though. We binned 3.5 million boosters. Would they still be counted?
They would be the number administered by the manufacture searched - Pfizer.The tab at the bottom of her clips says covid vaccines doses by manufacture not administered.
View attachment 1118282
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?