6 or 8
I'm still only on three! If they want me to have more then as lovely as they are, stickers just won't be enough and they will need to look at breaking out the ice lollies.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I'm still only on three! If they want me to have more then as lovely as they are, stickers just won't be enough and they will need to look at breaking out the ice lollies.
I had my second one on a lovely summers day in June, no stickers but they had boxes of ice creams which had been donated. Was very nice6 or 8
I'm still only on three! If they want me to have more then as lovely as they are, stickers just won't be enough and they will need to look at breaking out the ice lollies.
Loyalty card
For a free pack of antivirals once you collect 6 stampsLoyalty card
No idea how they’re going to come up with an effective vaccine for transmission with reinfections so prevalent
COVID-19: Dozens of people in UK have had coronavirus four times and thousands have been infected three times, official figures show
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) says 62 people have had four positive tests, each of them at least 90 days apart, since the start of the pandemic. Another 7,640 had been infected three times by 6 March 2022, when the data was collected.
news.sky.com
Last edited:
But how can that be when right at the start in Rochelle Walkensky's own words: " Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick?"For a free pack of antivirals once you collect 6 stamps
No idea how they’re going to come up with an effective vaccine for transmission with reinfections so prevalent
COVID-19: Dozens of people in UK have had coronavirus four times and thousands have been infected three times, official figures show
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) says 62 people have had four positive tests, each of them at least 90 days apart, since the start of the pandemic. Another 7,640 had been infected three times by 6 March 2022, when the data was collected.
Did "THE SCIENCE" change?
.
Have you been asleep for a year.
OF COURSE no-one has a problem with them when it's personal choice, ONLY!
Well you’re the one adding vomit reactions to posts about optional future boosters.
ERM maybe just maybe because of what people have gone through and continue to go through because of this vaccine and all that surrounds it 
.
Not because I'm antichoice... just the opposite
.Not because I'm antichoice... just the opposite
That would only apply if someone had made a glib post that made light of vaccine side effects, which they haven’t.ERM maybe just maybe because of what people have gone through and continue to go through because of this vaccine and all that surrounds it
Not because I'm antichoice... just the opposite
Sounds like an excuse to me.
Do I have to spell it out. I am not just on about side effects!!!!!!!!That would only apply if someone had made a glib post that made light of vaccine side effects, which they haven’t.
Sounds like an excuse to me.
I’ve seen you add vomit reaction to someone saying they won’t take in any Ukrainian refugees (how many have you taken in?
)So I’d get off your ‘I respect free choice’ high horse
And I’ve seen you add a lot more vomit reactions than me, so you first. I’ll even help you but I’ll need to find an exceptionally tall ladder.I’ve seen you add vomit reaction to someone saying they won’t take in any Ukrainian refugees (how many have you taken in?
So I’d get off your ‘I respect free choice’ high horse
I add vomit reactions to comments that I find disgusting usually if it involves being pro mandatory vaccine or when people have said they hope anti-vaxxers die.And I’ve seen you add a lot more vomit reactions than me, so you first. I’ll even help you but I’ll need to find an exceptionally tall ladder.
How can you be pro free choice and ‘I respect you don’t want to take the vaccine’ but then sickened someone doesn’t want to let a strange family into their private home. It’s quite clear you are not in favour of people having free choice and you are actually quite authoritarian.
I've said plenty of times that I think it's fine if people don't want to take Ukrainian refugees in. Everyone's circumstances are different and no one should be shamed for either not being able to or wanting to.
I'll think you'll find any post I've left a vomit reaction to on that subject are those who've expressed a lot more than simply not wanting to house refugees themselves. Those posts will almost certainly be along the lines of: "We shouldn't be taking any refugees in, we need to help our own first, it's got nothing to do with us" and similar posts that are -- in my opinion -- heartless. Note I'm paraphrasing there, rather than seeking to call out particular people on a thread that they don't contribute to and hence can't defend themselves.
So, as you'll see, I'm in favour of people being able to choose whether they house a refugee, rather than those who think we, as a country, should do nothing. The latter view is authoritarian as they'd happily stop anyone taking in a refugee, hence removing their choice.
Anyway that's my final word on the subject here because this is the Covid vaccine thread. I'm happy to continue the discussion in another more appropriate thread, though, as I'm always open to sharing views.
“Aimed at preventing Covid infections in people with poor immune systems who cannot be vaccinated, Evusheld is already approved in the US, France and other countries, and the US government has ordered 1.7m doses.”
amp.theguardian.com
“Great for anyone who wants to have it.”
If you are the opposite of anti choice, then I don’t see why you would have an issue with me saying that it is great there will an option of future boosters for ANYONE who wants to have it.
AstraZeneca’s Evusheld Covid-prevention drug gets UK approval | AstraZeneca | The Guardian
Treatment aimed at people who cannot be vaccinated is boost to firm’s coronavirus portfolio
You also put vomit emojis on pretty much all of my posts including this one -ERM maybe just maybe because of what people have gone through and continue to go through because of this vaccine and all that surrounds it
Not because I'm antichoice... just the opposite
“Great for anyone who wants to have it.”
If you are the opposite of anti choice, then I don’t see why you would have an issue with me saying that it is great there will an option of future boosters for ANYONE who wants to have it.
Last edited:
"The trials have shown that inhaled COVID-19 vaccine induces the desired immune response and stimulates the creation of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a safe manner in the test animals. "
www.euractiv.pl
Ooops:
Protection from COVID-19 without a jab? Trial results of inhaled vaccine show promise
Instead of being poked with a needle, inhaling a little bit of aerosol – that’s how getting vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus could soon look like.
Ooops:
"The trials have shown that inhaled COVID-19 vaccine induces the desired immune response and stimulates the creation of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a safe manner in the test animals. "
Protection from COVID-19 without a jab? Trial results of inhaled vaccine show promise
Instead of being poked with a needle, inhaling a little bit of aerosol – that’s how getting vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus could soon look like.
Ooops:
View attachment 1135810
Then we have all those tests over the last two years that were not accurate they knew it we knew it and people still accepted that the cases and the deaths were not manipulated
I've never had an inhalation vaccine before, but I suppose it's good for people who don't like needles.
That’s how they give the flu vaccine to kids not nice if you take an allergy though, a big scabbby nose looks terrible ,at least you can hide behind a mask
Poor woman 
Covid: Woman died from rare vaccine side-effect
A coroner says Kim Lockwood, who died 10 days after receiving her Covid jab, was "extremely unlucky".
www.bbc.co.uk
- Status