I can imagine they are still going to be crappy and not answer much!!We may hear some more details come out in the coming weeks. There'll be a lot to try and unravel here though if they continue not to answer questions.
It's such a stupid thing to say, and from a journalist. I see they have now deleted the tweet. As far as I am concerned there is absolutely no excuse for any of this. At the very least she should have told the police where to find the poor little love. Unbelievable selfishness.Yeah, absolute BOLLOCKS to that. As someone who had PND, I can assure you I definitely spoke up. My priority has always been to do everything I can to be the best mum I can possibly be for my wonderful little boy.
I think we'll hear more at trial even if they don't speak. Her lawyers will put forward a lot of mitigating factors if the coercive control theory is correct.We may hear some more details come out in the coming weeks. There'll be a lot to try and unravel here though if they continue not to answer questions.
Loads better, thanks. CBT is greatIt's such a stupid thing to say, and from a journalist. I see they have now deleted the tweet. As far as I am concerned there is absolutely no excuse for any of this. At the very least she should have told the police where to find the poor little love. Unbelievable selfishness.
Hope you're doing better now 🩷
True it couldve been SIDSI’m not defending them. I’m absolutely not. I’m heartbroken that this is the outcome for the baby and I do believe it could and should have been avoided in some way.
But every single person saying they’re evil / they deserve what’s coming / they should be sterilised etc etc is making an assumption on what happened just as much as anyone else who might say what if she or he had psychosis or PTSD.
I wouldn’t want someone on my jury who can make a snap judgement on someone they don’t know and declare them evil just from a tiny bit of information.
She concealed her pregnancy and went into hiding when she started showing. She wouldn't have needed to drop the baby off anywhere, it was probably going to be removed at birth.I mean it doesn't happen much nowadays but years ago women who had baby's and knew they couldn't look after them used to leave them on doorsteps for someone to find. It used to happen alot. She could have done that easily and baby would have got medical care.
Absolutely get what you’re saying. But IMO to actively prevent your child from getting the help and support they need as this pair did IS evil. Even if the baby passed from natural causes (which I doubt), the pair of them have shown themselves to be at best piss poor parents.I’m not defending them. I’m absolutely not. I’m heartbroken that this is the outcome for the baby and I do believe it could and should have been avoided in some way.
But every single person saying they’re evil / they deserve what’s coming / they should be sterilised etc etc is making an assumption on what happened just as much as anyone else who might say what if she or he had psychosis or PTSD.
I wouldn’t want someone on my jury who can make a snap judgement on someone they don’t know and declare them evil just from a tiny bit of information.
I wanted to say that earlier but didn’t in fear of the usual apologists and do-gooders. There is NO excuse for this outcome.Constance should be forcibly sterilised at this point.
Anyone that prioritises a man over their children doesn't deserve to be a mother.She's chosen MG above everything else, literally everything including at least 1 child. As a woman/mum I just can’t make any sense of it.