Constance Marten case - missing mum

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I‘m in agreement with previous poster that MG has no mental health issues! Unfortunately it has become so so easy for everyone especially perpetrators to throw mental health card around to get their way. I’m sure others like myself have come across at least 4 cases in last couple of months where all of them claimed mental health issues or diminished responsibilities, thank fully in three of those cases the jurors saw right through the bullshit spouted.
It is going to happen in this case too one or both will claim mental health issues and try to get away with it or get lesser sentence.
I do think CM has, though. To what extent and what has been made worse by their actions since September is the difficult part to untangle, but if social services have been previously involved, there may well be assessments that have been done previously.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 9
Two taxi drivers have said that they heard a baby crying and moving
But why didn’t these taxi drivers report them to the sodding police AT THE TIME
I know if my husband was the taxi driver he wouldn’t have been aware of this case, very rarely listens to the news and only for I filling him in would never hear of cases like this, I told him about it this morning and it was the first he had heard of it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
I‘m in agreement with previous poster that MG has no mental health issues! Unfortunately it has become so so easy for everyone especially perpetrators to throw mental health card around to get their way. I’m sure others like myself have come across at least 4 cases in last couple of months where all of them claimed mental health issues or diminished responsibilities, thank fully in three of those cases the jurors saw right through the bullshit spouted.
It is going to happen in this case too one or both will claim mental health issues and try to get away with it or get lesser sentence.
I agree. The fact that they've not been sectioned and have been deemed fit for interview shows that they both must have capacity.

The mental health card is a difficult one, particularly in the case of Constance. If she looked more like Rose West there might be a different view, who knows? I hope her wealth allows her to get the very best MH support which she'll inevitably need.

How long do the police keep on looking? The wee soul could literally be anywhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
I think there’s a lot of projection going on here tbh. A lot of she’ll be feeling this, he’ll have done this and said that to her. Armchair diagnosis of PTSD, etc. While it’s safe to assume she has mental health issues, and we know he’s a vile bastard, we have no idea about the dynamics of their relationship or the exact details of her mental state.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 41
It's so frustrating but screams guilt surely?!
Not necessarily no. You’re well within your rights to refuse to answer the police’s questions and it’s sometimes advised where the person would not perform well in the interview (and potentially bring suspicion on themselves even if they are innocent) so that their lawyer can present their statement to the police. The courts can only interpret silence/no comment negatively if the person later relies on something in their defence, that they could’ve reasonably disclosed in their police interview. So it’s very nuanced.

Having said all that, I do think it screams guilt here!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
I agree. The fact that they've not been sectioned and have been deemed fit for interview shows that they both must have capacity.

The mental health card is a difficult one, particularly in the case of Constance. If she looked more like Rose West there might be a different view, who knows? I hope her wealth allows her to get the very best MH support which she'll inevitably need.

How long do the police keep on looking? The wee soul could literally be anywhere.
I'm definitely no expert but I wonder if being sectioned would close off the option to have the police questioned. I'd also suspect it's something that would require assessment by at least two professionals which could take considerable time and effort.

Based on personal experience (where no crime had been commited) it's particularly difficult to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act in the UK. But obviously that may change if it's within the context of a crime being committed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
If they section either of them now they won’t be well enough to questuon/interview/interrogate. The police’s primary focus is finding the baby, having them sectioned would slow that down massively.

That doesn’t mean they’re not unwell. I don’t think what they have done are the actions of people who are of sound mind. Whether both of them are unwell is also another question.

edited to add cross posted with the above. Also usually having someone sectioned is to remove any risk them may be to themselves or anyone else. In theory, you achieve that by putting someone in a police cell. So there’s nothing to be gained by sectioning either of them now, if it does transpire that they are mentally unwell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
I'm definitely no expert but I wonder if being sectioned would close off the option to have the police questioned. I'd also suspect it's something that would require assessment by at least two professionals which could take considerable time and effort.

Based on personal experience (where no crime had been commited) it's particularly difficult to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act in the UK. But obviously that may change if it's within the context of a crime being committed.
Yeah your right. I too have recently had an experience with a family member who needed some very urgent help for her own safety. Even though there was police involvement she didn't even get a callback from a MH team for 36 hours. I guess it's only the very obviously violent/aggressive who get sectioned nowadays. Our MH services just can't cope ☹ Maybe that's why we end up with situations like this. Ah it's a mess.

I've had a shufty at the police guidance for dealing with Mental Illness and there's lots of procedures they have to follow to ensure that the detainees Mental Health is considered and addressed.
---
If they section either of them now they won’t be well enough to questuon/interview/interrogate. The police’s primary focus is finding the baby, having them sectioned would slow that down massively.

That doesn’t mean they’re not unwell. I don’t think what they have done are the actions of people who are of sound mind. Whether both of them are unwell is also another question.

edited to add cross posted with the above. Also usually having someone sectioned is to remove any risk them may be to themselves or anyone else. In theory, you achieve that by putting someone in a police cell. So there’s nothing to be gained by sectioning either of them now, if it does transpire that they are mentally unwell.
Yes you're right. Although the guidance states that if they feel that their MH is declined they may request support/assessment/treatment. Not necessarily this case but that must be a nightmare for the police to deal with for those who know every loophole and play the system.

They must also have capacity to be interviewed. Which if the interviews have been extended it seems they have.

I mentioned sectioning because my mind was cast back to a local man who murdered his son a few years ago, he was in a (drug induced) psychotic episode at the time and was sectioned and detained in a MH unit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5
I’m sorry, I’m a little new to this one, stilll reading up.
One thing that struck me was the car was found on the M61 on Jan 5th, the placenta was found in the burnt out remains. If staged maybe this was to hide the evidence of any baby and then onto Liverpool. That’s a good old journey on a normal day never mind just after giving birth, so why travel all the way there? If it was to get to Ireland why didn’t they? Why go all the way to Liverpool between 5-7th Jan then all the way back again the following day? Talking about a 200+ mile journey x 2 in space of 3 days. By Jan 7 they were buying camping gear and dumping the buggy ☹ in London.
Which taxi drivers heard a baby crying? Bolton? Liverpool? London?
I’m wondering if something happened to the poor baby when it was only days old, maybe in Liverpool, this would've changed everything, including the need to get to Ireland, so they travelled all the way back down south and lived maybe wild camping.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I’m sorry, I’m a little new to this one, stilll reading up.
One thing that struck me was the car was found on the M61 on Jan 5th, the placenta was found in the burnt out remains. If staged maybe this was to hide the evidence of any baby and then onto Liverpool. That’s a good old journey on a normal day never mind just after giving birth, so why travel all the way there? If it was to get to Ireland why didn’t they? Why go all the way to Liverpool between 5-7th Jan then all the way back again the following day? Talking about a 200+ mile journey x 2 in space of 3 days. By Jan 7 they were buying camping gear and dumping the buggy ☹ in London.
Which taxi drivers heard a baby crying? Bolton? Liverpool? London?
I’m wondering if something happened to the poor baby when it was only days old, maybe in Liverpool, this would've changed everything, including the need to get to Ireland, so they travelled all the way back down south and lived maybe wild camping.
I can't find the bit about taxi drivers hearing the baby anywhere, does anybody have a link?
 
I remember watching a program where they said 99% of arrested people give no comment interviews. Even when they're unquestionably guilty. It's extremely rare for someone to answer questions. They're advised by their legals to do it. Means they can't incriminate themselves in any way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
  • Heart
Reactions: 1
If the baby has passed away for whatever reason while they’ve been on the move, it’s possible they don’t even really know where it is. If they’ve been sleeping rough in random fields and woods and they’ve been on drugs they possibly weren’t very aware of where they actually were and just had a desire to keep moving “south”, for example, if they were heading to Brighton. Still no excuse for them not answering questions about what has happened though. Just a very sad thought and if so the baby might never be found.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
States early in January. A long time ago when you know what we know now.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: 1
I remember watching a program where they said 99% of arrested people give no comment interviews. Even when they're unquestionably guilty. It's extremely rare for someone to answer questions. They're advised by their legals to do it. Means they can't incriminate themselves in any way.
Fair enough, but if the question is ‘we want to find your baby to stop it dying, where is it?’
Not quite the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
According to ITV there is to be an announcement in the next half hour
---
According to ITV there is to be a significant announcement in the next half hour, I think senior forensic specialists have been brought in from London 😢
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 8
I agree. The fact that they've not been sectioned and have been deemed fit for interview shows that they both must have capacity.

The mental health card is a difficult one, particularly in the case of Constance. If she looked more like Rose West there might be a different view, who knows? I hope her wealth allows her to get the very best MH support which she'll inevitably need.

How long do the police keep on looking? The wee soul could literally be anywhere.

Sorry but I hope her wealth has no bearing on who she can afford to get her off the hook in this tragic situation. There are plenty of MH "experts" who will be eager to take this case on including "flexible" court psychiatrists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Hi Guys , normally just read on here rather than post but can’t get over this . That poor poor baby .
In my view they are both vile monsters .
He’s a vile human so she’s . I don’t believe she’s a ‘scared woman in a abusive relationship’ that’s a cop out . If they want to live a horrible life do that but make sure you don’t have kids . SS will have given her chances to sort her life out she just can’t be arsed so don’t have more kids . (Only in my opinion of course
xxxx
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
Sorry but I hope her wealth has no bearing on who she can afford to get her off the hook in this tragic situation. There are plenty of MH "experts" who will be eager to take this case on including "flexible" court psychiatrists.
Oh no no no...I didn't mean a MH expert to get her off the hook. If she's hurt her baby intentionally or by neglect, then I hope she rots. Ml

But IF like so many on here genuinely believe, she is a victim of him, the system, her life, and has severe Mental Health issues then I hope she can get some good help. Because she won't get it on the NHS anytime soon.

We shall have to wait and see 😔
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.