Has been announced that he is on the sexual offenders register, may be that is why the hunt
I think they could be releasing this info in case it convinces people helping/harbouring them to turn them in.Why didn't the media go with this aspect of the story earlier even as it was being discussed online?
Maybe it needed verification for legal reasons and this took time?
Or maybe the police spoke to the media privately and asked them not to run this story at least until they had a chance at tracking them down quickly, as Constance and Mark might panic and harm the child? And perhaps now that its proving difficult to find them, the police have given the media a shove to report it, hoping it'll make people notice the story more?
I have a bad feeling about where this will endI really hope mum and baby are okay
People lose their children if a partner is viewed as dangerous, does happen. I've seen it happening with DV if they choose to remain living with them.This is such a heartbreaking case. I just wish we knew more because on the surface, I see a desperate mum who’s trying to keep her baby & being hunted like an animal by SS when she should be resting & enjoying her baby! On the other hand, it appears there was a previous child who she no longer has custody of (why?) those pictures that look like mugshots make me fearful she’s an addict & could be the cause. But regarding the children’s father, would this conviction mean he could never be a father simply because it’s a sex offence I.e even if deemed to be rehabilitated? Or do we think he’s done something since being back in the uk, or something to Constance & it’s not just about his past crimes? I just don’t understand how they could take her children away from her if it was only about his past!
It absolutely should be enough for social services involvement. I don't mean the baby should automatically be taken but a social worker should be appointed to look into the home etc.This is such a heartbreaking case. I just wish we knew more because on the surface, I see a desperate mum who’s trying to keep her baby & being hunted like an animal by SS when she should be resting & enjoying her baby! On the other hand, it appears there was a previous child who she no longer has custody of (why?) those pictures that look like mugshots make me fearful she’s an addict & could be the cause. But regarding the children’s father, would this conviction mean he could never be a father simply because it’s a sex offence I.e even if deemed to be rehabilitated? Or do we think he’s done something since being back in the uk, or something to Constance & it’s not just about his past crimes? I just don’t understand how they could take her children away from her if it was only about his past!
Do we know they are definitely her children and not nieces / nephews?Does anyone know what happened to her other children?
How sad and awful for everyone involvedthe standard have published a really interesting article about the whole thing here https://www.standard.co.uk/insider/...er-tatler-girl-constance-marten-b1053260.html
so she's not had any contact with friends or family in years. seems like it could be a case of abuse and coercive control to me, especially with his history. awful stuff
Thanks from that article you can see why the police are looking for her...the standard have published a really interesting article about the whole thing here https://www.standard.co.uk/insider/...er-tatler-girl-constance-marten-b1053260.html
so she's not had any contact with friends or family in years. seems like it could be a case of abuse and coercive control to me, especially with his history. awful stuff
I think it’s three children. The photos in the album are annotated with what looks to be the initials of the children, and there’s three different sets of initials.The reality is that she's got a FB album with at least 2 different children in who are not with her at the moment.