Yeah saw this comment
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
And in the latest edition of the “Duvet Set” you never knew you needed....
Yours for £75 - (Monga, I saw this & thought of you)
The bottom part says “Daddy Gates”....
Yours for £75 - (Monga, I saw this & thought of you)
The bottom part says “Daddy Gates”....
can you link any of the sites where this story was/continued/the reactions please
Genuinely interested in the story and how they didn’t know if she had a placebo.
couldn't agree more with this
just still doesn’t add up
cant accuse this site of removing any conversations around covid/vaccines, I’m sure many wish we did.
Last edited:
I can't find anything about it on google ! maybe because it's a minor ?
Hi everyone,
I don't mean to speak out of turn and this is not an attempt to moderate at all (this isn't a "but" post, my social anxiety makes me second guess everything and how it may be interpreted, it's a miracle I say anything at all ever!)
So I've been catching up on this thread today, mostly in an attempt to distract myself from a lovely tummy bug
I've had lots of thoughts and am possibly feeling brave enough to share them... I may very well delete this instead of sending but typing it out may be therapeutic in some way!
I think we can all agree that everything to do with Covid is an emotive topic, it has stirred up lots of different feelings for everyone. I think this means a lot of us are quite naturally reacting a little differently than we may do "normally". We may be more sensitive or defensive (just examples from my own experience!) and that can affect how we read and interpret things.
I think we can also agree that there are so many things here that we will never know the complete facts about, e.g. exact numbers of deaths that are solely due to Covid or the vaccinations. Partly because of reporting, but also because I'd imagine it's nigh on impossible to know these things for certain, there are so many different factors involved.
If we could maybe start from this point, it might make interactions on this thread and others a little less, erm, fractious? This is coming from someone who really struggles with conflict due to a difficult past, but I've struggled to read everything recently, because the tone has been very inflammatory
This could be a misunderstanding on my part, and I apologise if it is, but I've always viewed this thread as somewhere people can share something they have seen in a safe space and discuss it with people who are open-minded and willing to question things. That doesn't mean everyone will agree, but it should mean they can say the possible crazy/bizarre/ridiculous sounding thoughts that are in their mind without being shot down for it (which can happen in environments where people are very comfortable to accept a particular narrative). I personally am very happy to admit that some of my thoughts on different topics are a bit "out there", but that makes them interesting to discuss surely?
I know as humans we seek out answers and explanations, but sometimes we need to accept that these either don't exist or aren't accessible for us, and that the way we feel is just that. Evidence is great, but things aren't always black and white. The way we feel about things is valid regardless, it doesn't make it right or wrong necessarily.
There are things people have shared in this group that I had never even considered before, I love that! Regardless of how I feel about it, having the opportunity to think about it is something I welcome. I rarely respond to posts on threads, mostly because I don't know how valid my views are and I'm terrified if I'm asked to justify or explain them, "I don't know, it's just something I feel" isn't going to be an acceptable response. But I read posts and either have an instant view, or read into it more to see what I think, then move on. I don't feel the need to tell you all whether I agree or disagree, because ultimately, it's just my view you know, I don't expect it to change anything.
Being personal in responses or taking a response personally is where issues crop up, in my very humble opinion. In the same way I wouldn't tell a young child that they are bad/naughty etc., but would label the behaviour or action, would it be possible for us to state our feelings on the particular topic and not another poster's feelings or beliefs? Crazy idea I know! Just for example, if I was to share my thoughts on aliens, I'd like to know what other people think about aliens, not whether they think I'm right or wrong.
Totally understand that when it comes to sharing data or similar this is tricky. But all data is presented to give a particular narrative e.g. if I was a company (vaccine/cosmetic/car manufacturer/whatever) I would totally frame results as 84% of people loved my product, not 16% hated it. There's also no room in headline data for those who "think it's okay" or "aren't really bothered". And back to a much earlier point, it is so bloody hard to get real factual data that is completely and utterly impartial!!
Anywayyy, no idea what my point is other than a very childish "can't we all be nice to one another?!"
* Attempts to insert a GIF to lighten the mood and fails miserably
*
I don't mean to speak out of turn and this is not an attempt to moderate at all (this isn't a "but" post, my social anxiety makes me second guess everything and how it may be interpreted, it's a miracle I say anything at all ever!)
So I've been catching up on this thread today, mostly in an attempt to distract myself from a lovely tummy bug
I've had lots of thoughts and am possibly feeling brave enough to share them... I may very well delete this instead of sending but typing it out may be therapeutic in some way!I think we can all agree that everything to do with Covid is an emotive topic, it has stirred up lots of different feelings for everyone. I think this means a lot of us are quite naturally reacting a little differently than we may do "normally". We may be more sensitive or defensive (just examples from my own experience!) and that can affect how we read and interpret things.
I think we can also agree that there are so many things here that we will never know the complete facts about, e.g. exact numbers of deaths that are solely due to Covid or the vaccinations. Partly because of reporting, but also because I'd imagine it's nigh on impossible to know these things for certain, there are so many different factors involved.
If we could maybe start from this point, it might make interactions on this thread and others a little less, erm, fractious? This is coming from someone who really struggles with conflict due to a difficult past, but I've struggled to read everything recently, because the tone has been very inflammatory
This could be a misunderstanding on my part, and I apologise if it is, but I've always viewed this thread as somewhere people can share something they have seen in a safe space and discuss it with people who are open-minded and willing to question things. That doesn't mean everyone will agree, but it should mean they can say the possible crazy/bizarre/ridiculous sounding thoughts that are in their mind without being shot down for it (which can happen in environments where people are very comfortable to accept a particular narrative). I personally am very happy to admit that some of my thoughts on different topics are a bit "out there", but that makes them interesting to discuss surely?
I know as humans we seek out answers and explanations, but sometimes we need to accept that these either don't exist or aren't accessible for us, and that the way we feel is just that. Evidence is great, but things aren't always black and white. The way we feel about things is valid regardless, it doesn't make it right or wrong necessarily.
There are things people have shared in this group that I had never even considered before, I love that! Regardless of how I feel about it, having the opportunity to think about it is something I welcome. I rarely respond to posts on threads, mostly because I don't know how valid my views are and I'm terrified if I'm asked to justify or explain them, "I don't know, it's just something I feel" isn't going to be an acceptable response. But I read posts and either have an instant view, or read into it more to see what I think, then move on. I don't feel the need to tell you all whether I agree or disagree, because ultimately, it's just my view you know, I don't expect it to change anything.
Being personal in responses or taking a response personally is where issues crop up, in my very humble opinion. In the same way I wouldn't tell a young child that they are bad/naughty etc., but would label the behaviour or action, would it be possible for us to state our feelings on the particular topic and not another poster's feelings or beliefs? Crazy idea I know! Just for example, if I was to share my thoughts on aliens, I'd like to know what other people think about aliens, not whether they think I'm right or wrong.
Totally understand that when it comes to sharing data or similar this is tricky. But all data is presented to give a particular narrative e.g. if I was a company (vaccine/cosmetic/car manufacturer/whatever) I would totally frame results as 84% of people loved my product, not 16% hated it. There's also no room in headline data for those who "think it's okay" or "aren't really bothered". And back to a much earlier point, it is so bloody hard to get real factual data that is completely and utterly impartial!!
Anywayyy, no idea what my point is other than a very childish "can't we all be nice to one another?!"
* Attempts to insert a GIF to lighten the mood and fails miserably
*
It's so hard being on this side of the fence. Every bit of info has to be dug deep for. whereas on the other side of the fence, everything they believe is one click away, they have no idea how much is covered up because nothing they believe is covered up. Most don't see it until they have to see it. they don't see it until something they know to be the truth is covered up.Hi everyone,
I don't mean to speak out of turn and this is not an attempt to moderate at all (this isn't a "but" post, my social anxiety makes me second guess everything and how it may be interpreted, it's a miracle I say anything at all ever!)
So I've been catching up on this thread today, mostly in an attempt to distract myself from a lovely tummy bug
I think we can all agree that everything to do with Covid is an emotive topic, it has stirred up lots of different feelings for everyone. I think this means a lot of us are quite naturally reacting a little differently than we may do "normally". We may be more sensitive or defensive (just examples from my own experience!) and that can affect how we read and interpret things.
I think we can also agree that there are so many things here that we will never know the complete facts about, e.g. exact numbers of deaths that are solely due to Covid or the vaccinations. Partly because of reporting, but also because I'd imagine it's nigh on impossible to know these things for certain, there are so many different factors involved.
If we could maybe start from this point, it might make interactions on this thread and others a little less, erm, fractious? This is coming from someone who really struggles with conflict due to a difficult past, but I've struggled to read everything recently, because the tone has been very inflammatory
This could be a misunderstanding on my part, and I apologise if it is, but I've always viewed this thread as somewhere people can share something they have seen in a safe space and discuss it with people who are open-minded and willing to question things. That doesn't mean everyone will agree, but it should mean they can say the possible crazy/bizarre/ridiculous sounding thoughts that are in their mind without being shot down for it (which can happen in environments where people are very comfortable to accept a particular narrative). I personally am very happy to admit that some of my thoughts on different topics are a bit "out there", but that makes them interesting to discuss surely?
I know as humans we seek out answers and explanations, but sometimes we need to accept that these either don't exist or aren't accessible for us, and that the way we feel is just that. Evidence is great, but things aren't always black and white. The way we feel about things is valid regardless, it doesn't make it right or wrong necessarily.
There are things people have shared in this group that I had never even considered before, I love that! Regardless of how I feel about it, having the opportunity to think about it is something I welcome. I rarely respond to posts on threads, mostly because I don't know how valid my views are and I'm terrified if I'm asked to justify or explain them, "I don't know, it's just something I feel" isn't going to be an acceptable response. But I read posts and either have an instant view, or read into it more to see what I think, then move on. I don't feel the need to tell you all whether I agree or disagree, because ultimately, it's just my view you know, I don't expect it to change anything.
Being personal in responses or taking a response personally is where issues crop up, in my very humble opinion. In the same way I wouldn't tell a young child that they are bad/naughty etc., but would label the behaviour or action, would it be possible for us to state our feelings on the particular topic and not another poster's feelings or beliefs? Crazy idea I know! Just for example, if I was to share my thoughts on aliens, I'd like to know what other people think about aliens, not whether they think I'm right or wrong.
Totally understand that when it comes to sharing data or similar this is tricky. But all data is presented to give a particular narrative e.g. if I was a company (vaccine/cosmetic/car manufacturer/whatever) I would totally frame results as 84% of people loved my product, not 16% hated it. There's also no room in headline data for those who "think it's okay" or "aren't really bothered". And back to a much earlier point, it is so bloody hard to get real factual data that is completely and utterly impartial!!
Anywayyy, no idea what my point is other than a very childish "can't we all be nice to one another?!"
* Attempts to insert a GIF to lighten the mood and fails miserably
This thread is normally a nice one where we can chat and post, sometimes it goes tits up but soon goes back to normal.
I don't believe everything I read on here and others don't believe everything I post but there is a mutual respect that we all have different views on the same things. We all 100% know we are being lied to, we all know 100% that the media cover most things up. What we might disagree on, is what and how.
Take FB all the vaccine groups are being deleted as fast as they are created, we have to talk in code to try to keep them running. Youtube, Instagram all of them censor CT, strangely enough, they don't censor flat earth groups.
Test it. type in vaccine injury on FB and all the results will be 100% pushing vaccines and telling you they are safe. I can find you at least 30 child porn pages/groups but not any vaccine injury ones. How strange that FB and the others can find and delete a group where people are discussing the deaths and injuries of their children or other family and yet cannot seem to find and delete child porn groups even when 1000s of people are reporting them.
I asked about the 12year old Maddie on one of the groups and got this, is it true I have no idea but I do know 100% if it is you won't find it on mainstream TV or papers. If she is on there it will be dismissing it as a vaccine injury. We might find her on VAERS but as we know non-CT don't trust that either.
I will keep digging maybe she will be on highwire
Last edited:
Even if their previous baby died or was injured due to vaccination.?
I deleted my Facebook yesterday. I can't be on something that activity deletes something that doesn't fit their narrative. Especially when it comes to people's health! I can only assume that Facebook is in bed with the big pharma companies. Hence why any vaccine concern gets removed. We're going down a very dangerous road with media censorship as there seems to big conflicts of interests with these platforms. Essentially bribery on a epic scale.
The sad thing is those who don't believe vaccines caused injury and death, will believe they are right to delete these groups and censor people. To them, if it's not on main TV or any main media then it's not true. That's scary tit when you know who owns the media
I have no doubt this will all come out that's why I don't even bother getting down or angry about people dismissing this.
Might be worth going to the US to get it
Last edited:
Notice the "could" part? They know exactly what they're doing using that language. They could not possibly know the long term side affects for fertility because that would require years of data which they do not have. BBC again have received funding from Bill Gates so again that's a massive conflict of interest.
Unless things have changed for transwomen how does it explain their symptoms?.. I’d be more inclined to think hormones than immune system for period changes, it could lead to early menopause but with no long term data available it’s a chance people would have to take.
"There is now extensive evidence to suggest there is no link between the vaccine and pregnancy loss."
There is simply no long term data or extensive evidence for the vaccine at all. I am shocked how the vaccines are still promoted as safe and they are encouraging pregnant women to take it too
A video of the amazing Dr Mike Yeadon discussing media censorship. This man is losing money speaking out and damaging his reputation. He has nothing to gain by speaking out. I absolutely love him and Reiner Fuellmich. They will be on the right side of history. I think too many people are waking up to msm nowadays and are relying more on social media (using code words), telegram, bitchute etc. Platforms that aren't as big as the others. I think unless they delete the ability to communicate online then this whole thing will fall apart. I literally don't know anybody who trusts the news. Even if they don't realise the extent of its corruption.
Based on 2/3 months of data ! I wouldn't even contemplate having it who knows how the child would be affected after birth, cognitively."There is now extensive evidence to suggest there is no link between the vaccine and pregnancy loss."
There is simply no long term data or extensive evidence for the vaccine at all. I am shocked how the vaccines are still promoted as safe and they are encouraging pregnant women to take it too
I know a couple of pregnant woman who have got it because they read that you're more likely to go pre term labour or be seriously ill in the third trimester if you catch covid.
I'm currently in the 3rd trimester (still not taking the jab!!) But surely you should just be taking extra precautions if you're that worried about it, instead of, as you say not know what long term effects it could have on the baby. I wouldn't ever forgive myself if something happened and it was my fault
Edited to add: I don't hold it against the woman who have chosen to do it...this is a scary time to be pregnant
I know we've posted full interviews with Mike Yeadon, but here's a short clip highlighting exactly your point about the media and censorship and how it works.
He got a BBC broadcaster to retract a false statement because he had a case for slander, and he mentions how OFCOM set the rules on what must he said from March last year
Also attached is the OFCOM rules to all media sources
Attachments
I agree, although I see posts censored and deleted on social media. It is still a good platform to raise awareness. I see a lot of people including my dad who is not on social media and he believes everything mainstream media says without questioning or doing any research.
Having said that, many who do have social media still believe everything they see and hear on the news and discredit posts on social media as a "conspiracy theory"
Didn't Ofcom release a statement to the media at the beginning saying that they were only to cover the governments narrative and not to question what they were being told? I thought that was extremely sinister in itself.
More propaganda to entice to younger 40s to take the V. Take it to "avoid disaster", "it works against this variant". I also heard on the radio news this morning "workers worried about having to show their vaccine status with 1 in 2 work places considering it".. buckle up guys because the propaganda is going to be strong for this age group as they are the most clued up about it and have weighed up the risk vs reward in taking it.
- Status