i'm not sure why she became fixated on her assumption that the IC 20
000 is comprised very specifically of teachers, governors and only
women - but it's similar to how she struggles with the concept of any woman who don't have children. in her happy "celebrate ME because I'M a woman!" international women's day" stories this morning, she mentioned full-time working mothers, stay at home mothers....**wracked her brains**....oh, and female college students! she claims she's so "woke", but she's so stuck in outdated gender stereotypes! she genuinely believes that unless a woman is a student - which in babs' mind indicates that you're under the age of 21 - then they have kids. after all, they have no other purpose! what is a woman, if not defined by her motherhood?!
she's so insensitive and thoughtless, given the fact that there are so many woman who - for various reasons - are unable to have the children they desperately want, or simply choose not to have kids; neither of which make them any less of a woman, as she is clearly implying! her views are so rigid! it's like - for whatever reason - she decided that tatters are "insanely clever", thus assumed that - like her with her masters - they
must be teachers - likely teachers jealous of her "tactics" for controlling a class of teenagers - and just ran with it!