Is this true or just more laziness from them
Attachments
-
46.9 KB
Seriously. They hovered between 80K and 96-98K for what? The last 2 and 1/2, 3 years or longer?The subtext now is that, even if, at long last, and with much poorly-planned and ineffective effort, they may have reached a hundred thousand subscribers, it’s still not nearly enough to support their sickeningly wasteful lifestyle. By far. BY FAR.