Fake advertising for the BBC??
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Damn, I would watch this but the casting and the legal fees would bankrupt ITV.
As bad as that was it wasn't illegal at the time, is now of course and rightly so .
The crack addict is annoyed his mam has put abrupt end to his gravy train. I don't believe a word his lawyer has said and I wonder who paid for his lawyer to say that...
1. The sun has evidence to substantiate the claims
2. The BBC were given evidence that was serious enough to suspend HE
3. The victim's lawyers are high powered and multinational
Most fitting conclusion is that the victim WAS 17 when it happened, but he doesn't see himself as a victim and wanted the money.
Clearly (as per the Sun's evidence) if the victim was blackmailing HE for cash, he's money motivated, not "justice" motivated so he'd definitely take a payout in exchange for keeping his mouth shut.
Also, if the victim's income stream is OF/sex work, being discreet will keep clients.
His mum is likely justice motivated (reported that she didn't take any money for the story) so maybe she's at her wits end and wanted to see HE suffer consequences. Didn't involve the police because her son was involved in blackmailing him which is illegal. Just wanted to get him fired.
2. The BBC were given evidence that was serious enough to suspend HE
3. The victim's lawyers are high powered and multinational
Most fitting conclusion is that the victim WAS 17 when it happened, but he doesn't see himself as a victim and wanted the money.
Clearly (as per the Sun's evidence) if the victim was blackmailing HE for cash, he's money motivated, not "justice" motivated so he'd definitely take a payout in exchange for keeping his mouth shut.
Also, if the victim's income stream is OF/sex work, being discreet will keep clients.
His mum is likely justice motivated (reported that she didn't take any money for the story) so maybe she's at her wits end and wanted to see HE suffer consequences. Didn't involve the police because her son was involved in blackmailing him which is illegal. Just wanted to get him fired.
Michael Sheen was born to play Huw!!
You what?
I wonder if HE split up from his wife a while ago. Before it was deleted I saw no photos of him with his wife. Lots of him posing, looking moody, showing off his body because of working out, his mum, his dog. None of his wife or kids. Could he be out as gay or bisexual to his family and friends etc? And he may have been single for a while?
Can we have cameos from Mr Tumble and Fireman Sam too? Throw in some sort of police line up scene
I agree even if it comes out no pics before lad was 18 and no other illegal behavior, Mud sticks & to me newsreaders have to be 'trustworthy'
Maybe she was scared for her child seeing as they allegedly were using drugs, she may have thought her kid would be in trouble? She may have thought if she went to the source of the money to get it to stop her kid wouldn't have the funds for their habit ?
Quick, someone photoshop Michael Sheen's head onto the ass pic.
So IT is him then. I don’t even know what the story is anymore, and I had hoped it wouldn’t be him but to come on social media to like that posts does imply HE is the presenter. He could’ve easily made a tweet stating it’s not me etc or this has happened etc instead he likes those posts.
I think the BBC Culture Editor stating on Friday evening (live on air) that the victim is male is a pretty reliable source.
Oh my lord these threads are moving SO fast!
Can’t wait to see Huw is presenting Nudes At Ten.
The viewing figures will be going through the roof
with everyone wanting to check.
I’ve seen comments regarding Sam Fox at 16 and other topless models in the sun aged under 18, not right at all, but at the time it was allowed.
The minimum age was raised to 18 after the passing of the Sexual Offences Act. in 2003
Can’t wait to see Huw is presenting Nudes At Ten.
The viewing figures will be going through the roof
with everyone wanting to check. I’ve seen comments regarding Sam Fox at 16 and other topless models in the sun aged under 18, not right at all, but at the time it was allowed.
The minimum age was raised to 18 after the passing of the Sexual Offences Act. in 2003
There is some unconscious bias going on here
Mate, my Mum is considerably older than this person's Mum but I keep going back to sitting outside a cafe being engulfed in weed smoke from the person next to us and my Mum going "It smells like a cat's had a wee here, I want to go inside".
In a way, I feel for this woman - the world is moving on at such a pace, and I'm not going to fault anyone for being scared for their kid (especially if they're doing something that would have got you kicked out and disowned at the same age), but I'm not sure good decisions have been made here. Having said that, The Sun are massively, massively at fault for running with this without solid evidence.
Noted.
- Status